决策过程:对医学院组织的启示

John O. Lostetter, John E. Chapman
{"title":"决策过程:对医学院组织的启示","authors":"John O. Lostetter,&nbsp;John E. Chapman","doi":"10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80020-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, the authors make use of some contemporary models of decision-making to show how the process of decision-making can become more self-conscious, and thus both more enlightened and more assured. The approach is an examination of several models examined both from the perspective of the steps in the process itself, as well as general observations about the decision-making process. The practical focus is on the medical school organization with its unique characteristics. This article also examines the decision-making process through a comparison of two types of organizational structure (pyramidal and matrix) found in most medical schools.</p><p>Certain constants emerge from this article that positively enhance good decision-making. These elements are:</p><ul><li><span>(1)</span><span><p>the rapidity of change;</p></span></li><li><span>(2)</span><span><p>the critical need for a wide range of alternatives;</p></span></li><li><span>(3)</span><span><p>an understanding of both the organizational structure and human factors involved; and</p></span></li><li><span>(4)</span><span><p>the necessity of involving others in the decision-making process.</p></span></li></ul><p>By analyzing various modes of decision-making and presenting options, this article should be of real assistance to administrators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 161-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80020-8","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The decision-making process: Implications for the medical school organization\",\"authors\":\"John O. Lostetter,&nbsp;John E. Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80020-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this article, the authors make use of some contemporary models of decision-making to show how the process of decision-making can become more self-conscious, and thus both more enlightened and more assured. The approach is an examination of several models examined both from the perspective of the steps in the process itself, as well as general observations about the decision-making process. The practical focus is on the medical school organization with its unique characteristics. This article also examines the decision-making process through a comparison of two types of organizational structure (pyramidal and matrix) found in most medical schools.</p><p>Certain constants emerge from this article that positively enhance good decision-making. These elements are:</p><ul><li><span>(1)</span><span><p>the rapidity of change;</p></span></li><li><span>(2)</span><span><p>the critical need for a wide range of alternatives;</p></span></li><li><span>(3)</span><span><p>an understanding of both the organizational structure and human factors involved; and</p></span></li><li><span>(4)</span><span><p>the necessity of involving others in the decision-making process.</p></span></li></ul><p>By analyzing various modes of decision-making and presenting options, this article should be of real assistance to administrators.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and education\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 161-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80020-8\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165228180800208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165228180800208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,作者利用一些当代的决策模型来展示决策过程如何变得更加自我意识,从而更加开明和自信。该方法是对几个模型的检查,这些模型从过程本身的步骤以及对决策过程的一般观察的角度进行了检查。实践的重点是具有独特特点的医学院组织。本文还通过比较在大多数医学院发现的两种类型的组织结构(金字塔和矩阵)来检查决策过程。从这篇文章中可以看出,某些常量可以积极地促进良好的决策。这些要素是:(1)变化的快速性;(2)对广泛的替代方案的迫切需求;(3)对组织结构和所涉及的人为因素的理解;(4)让他人参与决策过程的必要性。本文通过分析各种决策模式并提出各种选择,对管理人员有一定的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The decision-making process: Implications for the medical school organization

In this article, the authors make use of some contemporary models of decision-making to show how the process of decision-making can become more self-conscious, and thus both more enlightened and more assured. The approach is an examination of several models examined both from the perspective of the steps in the process itself, as well as general observations about the decision-making process. The practical focus is on the medical school organization with its unique characteristics. This article also examines the decision-making process through a comparison of two types of organizational structure (pyramidal and matrix) found in most medical schools.

Certain constants emerge from this article that positively enhance good decision-making. These elements are:

  • (1)

    the rapidity of change;

  • (2)

    the critical need for a wide range of alternatives;

  • (3)

    an understanding of both the organizational structure and human factors involved; and

  • (4)

    the necessity of involving others in the decision-making process.

By analyzing various modes of decision-making and presenting options, this article should be of real assistance to administrators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信