教育和保健服务的质量

Hannu Vuori
{"title":"教育和保健服务的质量","authors":"Hannu Vuori","doi":"10.1016/S0165-2281(79)80005-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the first section of this paper, it is argued that although education is often offered as the most important remedy for the poor quality of health services, its role may have been exaggerated and that educational attempts to improve the quality of health services may be unilateral. Education cannot solve such problems as organizational and environmental barriers to the use of knowledge and available technology which may be far more important causes of deficient quality than lack of knowledge. Educational remedies may also overemphasize the cognitive elements of care, neglect the expectations of the consumers, and lead to unnecessarily expensive care by stressing the highest attainable quality at the expense of optimal and logical quality. In spite of these limitations, education does have a useful role to play in quality assurance. The labor intensiveness of health care and the “knowledge explosion” particularly enhance the role of education as a partial guarantee of high quality. In the second section of the paper, the contributions of basic and continuing education to the quality of health services are profiled. Special attention is paid to the curriculum development process, the credentialing of health personnel, and the establishment of priorities for and educational principles in continuing education. The last two sections deal with the training of health professionals to accept, perform, and use quality assurance and the education of the public in quality related matters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 67-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-2281(79)80005-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education and the quality of health services\",\"authors\":\"Hannu Vuori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0165-2281(79)80005-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the first section of this paper, it is argued that although education is often offered as the most important remedy for the poor quality of health services, its role may have been exaggerated and that educational attempts to improve the quality of health services may be unilateral. Education cannot solve such problems as organizational and environmental barriers to the use of knowledge and available technology which may be far more important causes of deficient quality than lack of knowledge. Educational remedies may also overemphasize the cognitive elements of care, neglect the expectations of the consumers, and lead to unnecessarily expensive care by stressing the highest attainable quality at the expense of optimal and logical quality. In spite of these limitations, education does have a useful role to play in quality assurance. The labor intensiveness of health care and the “knowledge explosion” particularly enhance the role of education as a partial guarantee of high quality. In the second section of the paper, the contributions of basic and continuing education to the quality of health services are profiled. Special attention is paid to the curriculum development process, the credentialing of health personnel, and the establishment of priorities for and educational principles in continuing education. The last two sections deal with the training of health professionals to accept, perform, and use quality assurance and the education of the public in quality related matters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 67-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-2281(79)80005-3\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165228179800053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165228179800053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在本文的第一部分中,有人认为,虽然教育经常被视为保健服务质量差的最重要补救办法,但它的作用可能被夸大了,提高保健服务质量的教育尝试可能是单方面的。教育不能解决在利用知识和现有技术方面的组织和环境障碍等问题,这些障碍可能是质量不足比缺乏知识更重要的原因。教育补救措施也可能过分强调护理的认知因素,忽视消费者的期望,并以牺牲最佳和合乎逻辑的质量为代价,强调可达到的最高质量,从而导致不必要的昂贵护理。尽管有这些限制,教育在质量保证方面确实起着有益的作用。卫生保健的劳动强度和“知识爆炸”特别增强了教育作为高质量部分保障的作用。在本文的第二部分,概述了基础教育和继续教育对保健服务质量的贡献。特别注意课程编制过程、保健人员的资格认证以及确定继续教育的优先事项和教育原则。最后两节涉及培训卫生专业人员接受、执行和使用质量保证,以及对公众进行有关质量问题的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education and the quality of health services

In the first section of this paper, it is argued that although education is often offered as the most important remedy for the poor quality of health services, its role may have been exaggerated and that educational attempts to improve the quality of health services may be unilateral. Education cannot solve such problems as organizational and environmental barriers to the use of knowledge and available technology which may be far more important causes of deficient quality than lack of knowledge. Educational remedies may also overemphasize the cognitive elements of care, neglect the expectations of the consumers, and lead to unnecessarily expensive care by stressing the highest attainable quality at the expense of optimal and logical quality. In spite of these limitations, education does have a useful role to play in quality assurance. The labor intensiveness of health care and the “knowledge explosion” particularly enhance the role of education as a partial guarantee of high quality. In the second section of the paper, the contributions of basic and continuing education to the quality of health services are profiled. Special attention is paid to the curriculum development process, the credentialing of health personnel, and the establishment of priorities for and educational principles in continuing education. The last two sections deal with the training of health professionals to accept, perform, and use quality assurance and the education of the public in quality related matters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信