医学审计能改变肌电图实践吗?

N.B Finnerup , B Johnsen , A Fuglsang-Frederiksen , M de Carvalho , P Fawcett , R Liguori , W Nix , I Schofield , A Vila
{"title":"医学审计能改变肌电图实践吗?","authors":"N.B Finnerup ,&nbsp;B Johnsen ,&nbsp;A Fuglsang-Frederiksen ,&nbsp;M de Carvalho ,&nbsp;P Fawcett ,&nbsp;R Liguori ,&nbsp;W Nix ,&nbsp;I Schofield ,&nbsp;A Vila","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00051-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Considerable variation in EMG practice has been described previously. Since 1992, 7 clinical neurophysiologists from 6 European countries prospectively collected electromyographic (EMG) examinations. The aim of this study was to examine whether several years of mutual influence among physicians using medical audit resulted in a more uniform EMG practice. We studied whether there was a change in the number of examinations per patient and the techniques used from the first 12 to the last 12 EMG examinations on patients with polyneuropathy. For F-wave studies and motor nerve studies, there was a clear change towards a more uniform practice. For sensory </span>nerve conduction studies and muscle studies, there were only minor changes. With regard to examination techniques, there was a reduction in the use of more time-consuming examination techniques (near-nerve sensory studies and quantitative muscle studies). It seems possible to change the EMG practice of individual physicians by international collaboration and medical audit. However, until now most changes have been minor and large differences in European EMG practices persist. The diversity of practices suggests a need for studies on the optimal application of existing examination techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"109 6","pages":"Pages 496-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00051-4","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can medical audit change electromyographic practice?\",\"authors\":\"N.B Finnerup ,&nbsp;B Johnsen ,&nbsp;A Fuglsang-Frederiksen ,&nbsp;M de Carvalho ,&nbsp;P Fawcett ,&nbsp;R Liguori ,&nbsp;W Nix ,&nbsp;I Schofield ,&nbsp;A Vila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00051-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Considerable variation in EMG practice has been described previously. Since 1992, 7 clinical neurophysiologists from 6 European countries prospectively collected electromyographic (EMG) examinations. The aim of this study was to examine whether several years of mutual influence among physicians using medical audit resulted in a more uniform EMG practice. We studied whether there was a change in the number of examinations per patient and the techniques used from the first 12 to the last 12 EMG examinations on patients with polyneuropathy. For F-wave studies and motor nerve studies, there was a clear change towards a more uniform practice. For sensory </span>nerve conduction studies and muscle studies, there were only minor changes. With regard to examination techniques, there was a reduction in the use of more time-consuming examination techniques (near-nerve sensory studies and quantitative muscle studies). It seems possible to change the EMG practice of individual physicians by international collaboration and medical audit. However, until now most changes have been minor and large differences in European EMG practices persist. The diversity of practices suggests a need for studies on the optimal application of existing examination techniques.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control\",\"volume\":\"109 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 496-501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00051-4\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

肌电图实践中的相当大的变化已经在前面描述过了。自1992年以来,来自欧洲6个国家的7名临床神经生理学家前瞻性地收集了肌电图(EMG)检查。本研究的目的是检验几年来使用医疗审计的医生之间的相互影响是否导致更统一的肌电图实践。我们研究了多发性神经病变患者的每名患者的检查次数和从前12次到后12次肌电图检查的技术是否有变化。对于f波研究和运动神经研究,有一个明显的变化,趋向于更统一的做法。对于感觉神经传导研究和肌肉研究,只有微小的变化。在检查技术方面,更耗时的检查技术(近神经感觉研究和定量肌肉研究)的使用有所减少。通过国际合作和医疗审计,似乎有可能改变个体医生的肌电图实践。然而,到目前为止,大多数变化都很小,欧洲肌电图实践的巨大差异仍然存在。实践的多样性表明需要对现有检查技术的最佳应用进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can medical audit change electromyographic practice?

Considerable variation in EMG practice has been described previously. Since 1992, 7 clinical neurophysiologists from 6 European countries prospectively collected electromyographic (EMG) examinations. The aim of this study was to examine whether several years of mutual influence among physicians using medical audit resulted in a more uniform EMG practice. We studied whether there was a change in the number of examinations per patient and the techniques used from the first 12 to the last 12 EMG examinations on patients with polyneuropathy. For F-wave studies and motor nerve studies, there was a clear change towards a more uniform practice. For sensory nerve conduction studies and muscle studies, there were only minor changes. With regard to examination techniques, there was a reduction in the use of more time-consuming examination techniques (near-nerve sensory studies and quantitative muscle studies). It seems possible to change the EMG practice of individual physicians by international collaboration and medical audit. However, until now most changes have been minor and large differences in European EMG practices persist. The diversity of practices suggests a need for studies on the optimal application of existing examination techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信