基于脑电图的交流:并发肌电活动的分析

Theresa M. Vaughan, Laurie A. Miner, Dennis J. McFarland, Jonathan R. Wolpaw
{"title":"基于脑电图的交流:并发肌电活动的分析","authors":"Theresa M. Vaughan,&nbsp;Laurie A. Miner,&nbsp;Dennis J. McFarland,&nbsp;Jonathan R. Wolpaw","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00107-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong>: Recent studies indicate that people can learn to control the amplitude of mu or beta rhythms in the EEG recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex and can use that control to move a cursor to targets on the computer screen. While subjects do not move during performance, it is possible that inapparent or unconscious muscle contractions contribute to the changes in the mu and beta rhythm activity responsible for cursor movement. We evaluated this possibility.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: EMG was recorded from 10 distal limb muscle groups while five trained subjects used mu or beta rhythms to move a cursor to targets at the bottom or top edge of a computer screen.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: EMG activity was very low during performance, averaging 4.0±4.4% (SD) of maximum voluntary contraction. Most important, the correlation, measured as r<sup>2</sup>, between target position and EMG activity averaged only 0.01±0.02, much lower than the correlation between target position and the EEG activity that controlled cursor movement, which averaged 0.39±0.18.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: These results strongly support the conclusion that EEG-based cursor control does no depend on concurrent muscle activity. EEG-based communication and control might provide a new augmentative communication option for those with severe motor disabilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 6","pages":"Pages 428-433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00107-2","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EEG-based communication: analysis of concurrent EMG activity\",\"authors\":\"Theresa M. Vaughan,&nbsp;Laurie A. Miner,&nbsp;Dennis J. McFarland,&nbsp;Jonathan R. Wolpaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00107-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong>: Recent studies indicate that people can learn to control the amplitude of mu or beta rhythms in the EEG recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex and can use that control to move a cursor to targets on the computer screen. While subjects do not move during performance, it is possible that inapparent or unconscious muscle contractions contribute to the changes in the mu and beta rhythm activity responsible for cursor movement. We evaluated this possibility.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: EMG was recorded from 10 distal limb muscle groups while five trained subjects used mu or beta rhythms to move a cursor to targets at the bottom or top edge of a computer screen.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: EMG activity was very low during performance, averaging 4.0±4.4% (SD) of maximum voluntary contraction. Most important, the correlation, measured as r<sup>2</sup>, between target position and EMG activity averaged only 0.01±0.02, much lower than the correlation between target position and the EEG activity that controlled cursor movement, which averaged 0.39±0.18.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: These results strongly support the conclusion that EEG-based cursor control does no depend on concurrent muscle activity. EEG-based communication and control might provide a new augmentative communication option for those with severe motor disabilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"107 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 428-433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00107-2\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498001072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498001072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

目的:最近的研究表明,人们可以学会控制从头皮感觉运动皮层记录的脑电图的mu或beta节律的振幅,并可以利用这种控制将光标移动到计算机屏幕上的目标。虽然实验对象在执行过程中不移动,但可能是隐性或无意识的肌肉收缩导致了负责光标移动的mu和beta节律活动的变化。我们评估了这种可能性。方法:记录10个远端肢体肌群的肌电图,同时5个训练对象使用mu或beta节奏将光标移动到计算机屏幕底部或顶部边缘的目标。结果:运动时肌电活动很低,平均最大自主收缩4.0±4.4% (SD)。最重要的是,目标位置与肌电活动的相关系数r2平均仅为0.01±0.02,远低于控制光标运动的目标位置与脑电活动的相关系数0.39±0.18。结论:这些结果有力地支持了基于脑电图的光标控制不依赖于并发肌肉活动的结论。基于脑电图的交流和控制可能为严重运动障碍患者提供一种新的辅助交流选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EEG-based communication: analysis of concurrent EMG activity

Objective: Recent studies indicate that people can learn to control the amplitude of mu or beta rhythms in the EEG recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex and can use that control to move a cursor to targets on the computer screen. While subjects do not move during performance, it is possible that inapparent or unconscious muscle contractions contribute to the changes in the mu and beta rhythm activity responsible for cursor movement. We evaluated this possibility.

Methods: EMG was recorded from 10 distal limb muscle groups while five trained subjects used mu or beta rhythms to move a cursor to targets at the bottom or top edge of a computer screen.

Results: EMG activity was very low during performance, averaging 4.0±4.4% (SD) of maximum voluntary contraction. Most important, the correlation, measured as r2, between target position and EMG activity averaged only 0.01±0.02, much lower than the correlation between target position and the EEG activity that controlled cursor movement, which averaged 0.39±0.18.

Conclusions: These results strongly support the conclusion that EEG-based cursor control does no depend on concurrent muscle activity. EEG-based communication and control might provide a new augmentative communication option for those with severe motor disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信