EOG校正:一个新的视角

Rodney J. Croft, Robert J. Barry
{"title":"EOG校正:一个新的视角","authors":"Rodney J. Croft,&nbsp;Robert J. Barry","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00086-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong>: In the field of EOG correction, discrepancies have been found between the propagation rates for different types and frequencies of eye movement. This study attempted to determine whether these differences could be explained by the affect of EOG magnitude on the correction procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: Experiment 1 utilized simulated data to determine whether the combination of EOG magnitude and other forms of interference distorted the estimation of the propagation coefficients (<span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span>s). Experiment 2 used real data to determine if the patterns obtained in Expt. 1 were apparent in real data.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Matched <em>t</em> tests found that simulated low power EOG produced inflated <span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span>s as a function of interference in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 found the same relationship between <span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span> and EOG magnitude as with the simulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The findings are consistent with the thesis that eye movement related fields propagate similarly for a range of EOG types and frequencies, suggesting that the <span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span> differences reported in the literature are artifactual, and indicating the need for a new correction procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 6","pages":"Pages 387-394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00086-8","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EOG correction: a new perspective\",\"authors\":\"Rodney J. Croft,&nbsp;Robert J. Barry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00086-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong>: In the field of EOG correction, discrepancies have been found between the propagation rates for different types and frequencies of eye movement. This study attempted to determine whether these differences could be explained by the affect of EOG magnitude on the correction procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: Experiment 1 utilized simulated data to determine whether the combination of EOG magnitude and other forms of interference distorted the estimation of the propagation coefficients (<span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span>s). Experiment 2 used real data to determine if the patterns obtained in Expt. 1 were apparent in real data.</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Matched <em>t</em> tests found that simulated low power EOG produced inflated <span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span>s as a function of interference in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 found the same relationship between <span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span> and EOG magnitude as with the simulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The findings are consistent with the thesis that eye movement related fields propagate similarly for a range of EOG types and frequencies, suggesting that the <span><math><mtext>B</mtext></math></span> differences reported in the literature are artifactual, and indicating the need for a new correction procedure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"107 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 387-394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00086-8\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

目的:在眼电校正领域,发现不同类型和频率的眼动传播速率存在差异。本研究试图确定这些差异是否可以用EOG震级对校正过程的影响来解释。方法:实验1利用模拟数据来确定EOG震级和其他形式的干扰是否会扭曲传播系数(b)的估计。实验2使用真实数据来确定在实验1中得到的模式在真实数据中是否明显。结果:匹配t检验发现,模拟低功率EOG在图1中产生膨胀的b作为干扰函数。实验2发现B和EOG震级之间的关系与模拟结果相同。结论:研究结果与眼动相关场在EOG类型和频率范围内传播相似的观点一致,这表明文献中报道的B差异是人为的,表明需要新的校正程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EOG correction: a new perspective

Objective: In the field of EOG correction, discrepancies have been found between the propagation rates for different types and frequencies of eye movement. This study attempted to determine whether these differences could be explained by the affect of EOG magnitude on the correction procedure.

Methods: Experiment 1 utilized simulated data to determine whether the combination of EOG magnitude and other forms of interference distorted the estimation of the propagation coefficients (Bs). Experiment 2 used real data to determine if the patterns obtained in Expt. 1 were apparent in real data.

Results: Matched t tests found that simulated low power EOG produced inflated Bs as a function of interference in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 found the same relationship between B and EOG magnitude as with the simulations.

Conclusions: The findings are consistent with the thesis that eye movement related fields propagate similarly for a range of EOG types and frequencies, suggesting that the B differences reported in the literature are artifactual, and indicating the need for a new correction procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信