纳米磁性核壳和大块分子印迹聚合物选择性提取人血浆中的胺碘酮

IF 6 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Kamran Banan , Fatemeh Ghorbani-Bidkorbeh , Hanif Afsharara , Dara Hatamabadi , Behnaz Landi , Rüstem Keçili , Börje Sellergren
{"title":"纳米磁性核壳和大块分子印迹聚合物选择性提取人血浆中的胺碘酮","authors":"Kamran Banan ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Ghorbani-Bidkorbeh ,&nbsp;Hanif Afsharara ,&nbsp;Dara Hatamabadi ,&nbsp;Behnaz Landi ,&nbsp;Rüstem Keçili ,&nbsp;Börje Sellergren","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2022.339548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Bulk and magnetic core-shell Molecularly Imprinted Polymers<span> (MMIPs) have been introduced and compared to extract and determine amiodarone<span> from a complex matrix, i.e., plasma, due to the importance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). Polymer synthesis was confirmed by FTIR, </span></span></span>AFM<span><span><span>, TGA, </span>DLS<span>, VSM, TEM, and the adsorption studies such as capacity, isothermal models, </span></span>selectivity, and regeneration were performed to evaluate and compare polymer efficiency in extraction and separation of amiodarone from sample solutions and human plasma. Both nano-sized and bulk polymers successfully extracted the target molecule at the low therapeutic ranges and the overdose concentrations (recoveries of 98.38%–102.70%). The maximum adsorption capacity of the MMIPs was 42.5 μg/mg compared with 2.6 μg/mg for bulk polymers. The imprinting factors of the polymers were 15.12 and 6.84 for MMIPs and bulk, respectively. MMIPs and bulk polymers presented 4.68 and 1.66 selectivity factors, respectively, towards amiodarone compared with lidocaine. LOD, LOQ, and enrichment factor in human plasma were 0.09, 0.28 μg mL</span></span><sup>−1</sup><span><span>, and 10 respectively. Recoveries of therapeutic concentration from plasma were 91.38 and 97.33% for bulk and MMIPs, respectively. MMIPs as an adsorbent in amiodarone extraction from plasma offered reduced necessary sample amount, less adsorbent consumption, reduced pretreatment time, and reduced elution solvent waste while yielding higher extraction recovery and more specificity for the target compared with the bulk polymer. Bulk polymers have a more straightforward synthesis procedure due to fewer synthesis steps and fewer variables, and Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Solid-phase Extraction (MIP-SPE) has already been introduced commercially. MMIPs prevail on a small scale, and in the context of a simple extraction, separation, or concentration in large-scale </span>bioanalysis, efforts towards optimization and development of MMIPs can unearth tremendous opportunities for green chemistry principles.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":240,"journal":{"name":"Analytica Chimica Acta","volume":"1198 ","pages":"Article 339548"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nano-sized magnetic core-shell and bulk molecularly imprinted polymers for selective extraction of amiodarone from human plasma\",\"authors\":\"Kamran Banan ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Ghorbani-Bidkorbeh ,&nbsp;Hanif Afsharara ,&nbsp;Dara Hatamabadi ,&nbsp;Behnaz Landi ,&nbsp;Rüstem Keçili ,&nbsp;Börje Sellergren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aca.2022.339548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Bulk and magnetic core-shell Molecularly Imprinted Polymers<span> (MMIPs) have been introduced and compared to extract and determine amiodarone<span> from a complex matrix, i.e., plasma, due to the importance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). Polymer synthesis was confirmed by FTIR, </span></span></span>AFM<span><span><span>, TGA, </span>DLS<span>, VSM, TEM, and the adsorption studies such as capacity, isothermal models, </span></span>selectivity, and regeneration were performed to evaluate and compare polymer efficiency in extraction and separation of amiodarone from sample solutions and human plasma. Both nano-sized and bulk polymers successfully extracted the target molecule at the low therapeutic ranges and the overdose concentrations (recoveries of 98.38%–102.70%). The maximum adsorption capacity of the MMIPs was 42.5 μg/mg compared with 2.6 μg/mg for bulk polymers. The imprinting factors of the polymers were 15.12 and 6.84 for MMIPs and bulk, respectively. MMIPs and bulk polymers presented 4.68 and 1.66 selectivity factors, respectively, towards amiodarone compared with lidocaine. LOD, LOQ, and enrichment factor in human plasma were 0.09, 0.28 μg mL</span></span><sup>−1</sup><span><span>, and 10 respectively. Recoveries of therapeutic concentration from plasma were 91.38 and 97.33% for bulk and MMIPs, respectively. MMIPs as an adsorbent in amiodarone extraction from plasma offered reduced necessary sample amount, less adsorbent consumption, reduced pretreatment time, and reduced elution solvent waste while yielding higher extraction recovery and more specificity for the target compared with the bulk polymer. Bulk polymers have a more straightforward synthesis procedure due to fewer synthesis steps and fewer variables, and Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Solid-phase Extraction (MIP-SPE) has already been introduced commercially. MMIPs prevail on a small scale, and in the context of a simple extraction, separation, or concentration in large-scale </span>bioanalysis, efforts towards optimization and development of MMIPs can unearth tremendous opportunities for green chemistry principles.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta\",\"volume\":\"1198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 339548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267022001192\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267022001192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

由于治疗药物监测(TDM)的重要性,已经介绍并比较了散装和磁性核壳分子印迹聚合物(MMIPs)从复杂基质(即血浆)中提取和测定胺碘酮。通过FTIR、AFM、TGA、DLS、VSM、TEM等手段证实了聚合物的合成,并通过容量、等温模型、选择性和再生等吸附研究来评价和比较聚合物在样品溶液和人血浆中提取和分离胺碘酮的效率。纳米聚合物和体聚合物均能在低治疗范围和过量浓度下成功提取靶分子(回收率为98.38% ~ 102.70%)。MMIPs的最大吸附容量为42.5 μg/mg,而散装聚合物的最大吸附容量为2.6 μg/mg。MMIPs和bulk的印迹因子分别为15.12和6.84。与利多卡因相比,MMIPs和本体聚合物对胺碘酮的选择性因子分别为4.68和1.66。人血浆LOD、LOQ和富集因子分别为0.09、0.28 μ mL−1和10。原料药和MMIPs的血浆治疗浓度回收率分别为91.38%和97.33%。与主体聚合物相比,MMIPs作为吸附剂从血浆中提取胺碘酮,减少了所需的样本量,减少了吸附剂的消耗,减少了预处理时间,减少了洗脱溶剂的浪费,同时具有更高的萃取回收率和更高的目标特异性。由于合成步骤更少,变量更少,体聚合物的合成过程更简单,分子印迹聚合物固相萃取(MIP-SPE)已经商业化。MMIPs在小范围内普遍存在,在大规模生物分析中简单的提取、分离或浓缩的背景下,对MMIPs的优化和发展的努力可以为绿色化学原理提供巨大的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nano-sized magnetic core-shell and bulk molecularly imprinted polymers for selective extraction of amiodarone from human plasma

Nano-sized magnetic core-shell and bulk molecularly imprinted polymers for selective extraction of amiodarone from human plasma

Bulk and magnetic core-shell Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MMIPs) have been introduced and compared to extract and determine amiodarone from a complex matrix, i.e., plasma, due to the importance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). Polymer synthesis was confirmed by FTIR, AFM, TGA, DLS, VSM, TEM, and the adsorption studies such as capacity, isothermal models, selectivity, and regeneration were performed to evaluate and compare polymer efficiency in extraction and separation of amiodarone from sample solutions and human plasma. Both nano-sized and bulk polymers successfully extracted the target molecule at the low therapeutic ranges and the overdose concentrations (recoveries of 98.38%–102.70%). The maximum adsorption capacity of the MMIPs was 42.5 μg/mg compared with 2.6 μg/mg for bulk polymers. The imprinting factors of the polymers were 15.12 and 6.84 for MMIPs and bulk, respectively. MMIPs and bulk polymers presented 4.68 and 1.66 selectivity factors, respectively, towards amiodarone compared with lidocaine. LOD, LOQ, and enrichment factor in human plasma were 0.09, 0.28 μg mL−1, and 10 respectively. Recoveries of therapeutic concentration from plasma were 91.38 and 97.33% for bulk and MMIPs, respectively. MMIPs as an adsorbent in amiodarone extraction from plasma offered reduced necessary sample amount, less adsorbent consumption, reduced pretreatment time, and reduced elution solvent waste while yielding higher extraction recovery and more specificity for the target compared with the bulk polymer. Bulk polymers have a more straightforward synthesis procedure due to fewer synthesis steps and fewer variables, and Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Solid-phase Extraction (MIP-SPE) has already been introduced commercially. MMIPs prevail on a small scale, and in the context of a simple extraction, separation, or concentration in large-scale bioanalysis, efforts towards optimization and development of MMIPs can unearth tremendous opportunities for green chemistry principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytica Chimica Acta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1081
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Analytica Chimica Acta has an open access mirror journal Analytica Chimica Acta: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Analytica Chimica Acta provides a forum for the rapid publication of original research, and critical, comprehensive reviews dealing with all aspects of fundamental and applied modern analytical chemistry. The journal welcomes the submission of research papers which report studies concerning the development of new and significant analytical methodologies. In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and impact of the research and the extent to which it adds to the existing body of knowledge in analytical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信