{"title":"基于颅骨幻像的脑电与脑电偶极子定位精度研究","authors":"R.M Leahy , J.C Mosher , M.E Spencer , M.X Huang , J.D Lewine","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00057-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective:</strong> To investigate the accuracy of forward and inverse techniques for EEG and MEG dipole localization.</p><p><strong>Design and Methods:</strong> A human skull phantom was constructed with brain, skull and scalp layers and realistic relative conductivities. Thirty two independent current dipoles were distributed within the `brain' region and EEG and MEG data collected separately for each dipole. The true dipole locations and orientations and the morphology of the brain, skull and scalp layers were extracted from X-ray CT data. The location of each dipole was estimated from the EEG and MEG data using the R-MUSIC inverse method and forward models based on spherical and realistic head geometries. Additional computer simulations were performed to investigate the factors affecting localization accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Localization errors using the relatively simpler locally fitted sphere approach are only slightly greater than those using a BEM approach. The average localization error over the 32 dipoles was 7–8 mm for EEG and 3 mm for MEG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The superior performance of MEG over EEG appears to be because the latter is more sensitive to errors in the forward model arising from simplifying assumptions concerning the conductivity of the skull, scalp and brain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 2","pages":"Pages 159-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00057-1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom\",\"authors\":\"R.M Leahy , J.C Mosher , M.E Spencer , M.X Huang , J.D Lewine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00057-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objective:</strong> To investigate the accuracy of forward and inverse techniques for EEG and MEG dipole localization.</p><p><strong>Design and Methods:</strong> A human skull phantom was constructed with brain, skull and scalp layers and realistic relative conductivities. Thirty two independent current dipoles were distributed within the `brain' region and EEG and MEG data collected separately for each dipole. The true dipole locations and orientations and the morphology of the brain, skull and scalp layers were extracted from X-ray CT data. The location of each dipole was estimated from the EEG and MEG data using the R-MUSIC inverse method and forward models based on spherical and realistic head geometries. Additional computer simulations were performed to investigate the factors affecting localization accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Localization errors using the relatively simpler locally fitted sphere approach are only slightly greater than those using a BEM approach. The average localization error over the 32 dipoles was 7–8 mm for EEG and 3 mm for MEG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The superior performance of MEG over EEG appears to be because the latter is more sensitive to errors in the forward model arising from simplifying assumptions concerning the conductivity of the skull, scalp and brain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"107 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00057-1\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨脑电图和脑磁图偶极子定位的正、逆方法的准确性。设计与方法:采用脑、颅骨、头皮三层结构和真实的相对电导率构建人颅骨模型。32个独立的电流偶极子分布在“大脑”区域内,每个偶极子分别收集EEG和MEG数据。从x线CT数据中提取真实偶极子的位置和方向以及脑、颅骨和头皮层的形态。利用R-MUSIC逆方法和基于球形和真实头部几何形状的正演模型,从脑电和脑磁图数据中估计每个偶极子的位置。此外,还进行了计算机模拟,以研究影响定位精度的因素。结果:相对简单的局部拟合球法定位误差仅略大于边界元法定位误差。32个偶极子的平均定位误差EEG为7 ~ 8 mm, MEG为3 mm。结论:脑磁图优于脑电图可能是因为脑电图对正演模型的误差更敏感,因为正演模型简化了对颅骨、头皮和大脑电导率的假设。
A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom
Objective: To investigate the accuracy of forward and inverse techniques for EEG and MEG dipole localization.
Design and Methods: A human skull phantom was constructed with brain, skull and scalp layers and realistic relative conductivities. Thirty two independent current dipoles were distributed within the `brain' region and EEG and MEG data collected separately for each dipole. The true dipole locations and orientations and the morphology of the brain, skull and scalp layers were extracted from X-ray CT data. The location of each dipole was estimated from the EEG and MEG data using the R-MUSIC inverse method and forward models based on spherical and realistic head geometries. Additional computer simulations were performed to investigate the factors affecting localization accuracy.
Results: Localization errors using the relatively simpler locally fitted sphere approach are only slightly greater than those using a BEM approach. The average localization error over the 32 dipoles was 7–8 mm for EEG and 3 mm for MEG.
Conclusion: The superior performance of MEG over EEG appears to be because the latter is more sensitive to errors in the forward model arising from simplifying assumptions concerning the conductivity of the skull, scalp and brain.