使用自组织神经网络的癫痫检测:与其他检测策略的验证和比较

A.J Gabor
{"title":"使用自组织神经网络的癫痫检测:与其他检测策略的验证和比较","authors":"A.J Gabor","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00043-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective</em>: A previously described seizure detection algorithm (CNET) (Gabor, A.J., Leach, R.R. and Dowla, F.U. Automated seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 99: 257–266) was validated with 200 records from 65 patients (4553.8 h of recording) containing 181 seizures. <em>Design and methods</em>: Performance of the algorithm was manifest by its sensitivity ((seizures detected/total seizures)×100) and selectivity (false-positive errors/Hr-FPH). Comparisons with the Monitor detection algorithm (Version 8.0c, Stellate Systems) and audio-transformation (Oxford Medilog) were performed. <em>Results</em>: CNET detected 92.8% of the seizures and had a mean FPH of 1.35±1.35. Monitor detected 74.4% of the seizures and had a mean FPH of 3.02±2.78. Audiotransformation detected all but 3 (98.3%) of the seizures. Selectivity for this detection strategy was not defined. <em>Conclusions</em>: This study not only validates the CNET algorithm, but also the notion that seizures have frequency-amplitude features that are localized in signal space and can be selectively identified as being distinct from other types of EEG patterns. The ear is a specialized frequency-amplitude detector and when the signal is transformed into audio frequency range (audio-transformation), seizures can be detected with better sensitivity as compared to the other strategies examined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00043-1","citationCount":"123","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network: validation and comparison with other detection strategies\",\"authors\":\"A.J Gabor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00043-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Objective</em>: A previously described seizure detection algorithm (CNET) (Gabor, A.J., Leach, R.R. and Dowla, F.U. Automated seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 99: 257–266) was validated with 200 records from 65 patients (4553.8 h of recording) containing 181 seizures. <em>Design and methods</em>: Performance of the algorithm was manifest by its sensitivity ((seizures detected/total seizures)×100) and selectivity (false-positive errors/Hr-FPH). Comparisons with the Monitor detection algorithm (Version 8.0c, Stellate Systems) and audio-transformation (Oxford Medilog) were performed. <em>Results</em>: CNET detected 92.8% of the seizures and had a mean FPH of 1.35±1.35. Monitor detected 74.4% of the seizures and had a mean FPH of 3.02±2.78. Audiotransformation detected all but 3 (98.3%) of the seizures. Selectivity for this detection strategy was not defined. <em>Conclusions</em>: This study not only validates the CNET algorithm, but also the notion that seizures have frequency-amplitude features that are localized in signal space and can be selectively identified as being distinct from other types of EEG patterns. The ear is a specialized frequency-amplitude detector and when the signal is transformed into audio frequency range (audio-transformation), seizures can be detected with better sensitivity as compared to the other strategies examined.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 27-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00043-1\",\"citationCount\":\"123\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123

摘要

目的:先前描述的癫痫发作检测算法(CNET) (Gabor, a.j., Leach, R.R.和Dowla, F.U.)使用自组织神经网络自动检测癫痫发作。Electroenceph。中国。Neurophysiol。, 1996, 99: 257-266)在65例患者(记录4553.8小时)中包含181次癫痫发作的200条记录中得到验证。设计和方法:算法的性能体现在其灵敏度((检测到的癫痫发作数/总癫痫发作数)×100)和选择性(假阳性误差/Hr-FPH)上。与Monitor检测算法(Version 8.0c, stellar Systems)和音频转换(Oxford Medilog)进行比较。结果:CNET检出率为92.8%,平均FPH为1.35±1.35。监测器检出率为74.4%,平均FPH为3.02±2.78。除3例(98.3%)癫痫发作外,其余均可检测到。这种检测策略的选择性没有定义。结论:本研究不仅验证了CNET算法,而且验证了癫痫发作具有局部信号空间的频率-幅度特征,并且可以选择性地识别为与其他类型的脑电图模式不同。耳朵是一个专门的频率-幅度检测器,当信号转换为音频范围(音频转换)时,与检查的其他策略相比,可以以更好的灵敏度检测癫痫发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network: validation and comparison with other detection strategies

Objective: A previously described seizure detection algorithm (CNET) (Gabor, A.J., Leach, R.R. and Dowla, F.U. Automated seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 99: 257–266) was validated with 200 records from 65 patients (4553.8 h of recording) containing 181 seizures. Design and methods: Performance of the algorithm was manifest by its sensitivity ((seizures detected/total seizures)×100) and selectivity (false-positive errors/Hr-FPH). Comparisons with the Monitor detection algorithm (Version 8.0c, Stellate Systems) and audio-transformation (Oxford Medilog) were performed. Results: CNET detected 92.8% of the seizures and had a mean FPH of 1.35±1.35. Monitor detected 74.4% of the seizures and had a mean FPH of 3.02±2.78. Audiotransformation detected all but 3 (98.3%) of the seizures. Selectivity for this detection strategy was not defined. Conclusions: This study not only validates the CNET algorithm, but also the notion that seizures have frequency-amplitude features that are localized in signal space and can be selectively identified as being distinct from other types of EEG patterns. The ear is a specialized frequency-amplitude detector and when the signal is transformed into audio frequency range (audio-transformation), seizures can be detected with better sensitivity as compared to the other strategies examined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信