在单关节和双关节肌肉中,肌电图疲劳模式伴随着等长疲劳的膝关节伸展是不同的

Gerold Ebenbichler , Josef Kollmitzer , Michael Quittan , Frank Uhl , Chris Kirtley , Veronika Fialka
{"title":"在单关节和双关节肌肉中,肌电图疲劳模式伴随着等长疲劳的膝关节伸展是不同的","authors":"Gerold Ebenbichler ,&nbsp;Josef Kollmitzer ,&nbsp;Michael Quittan ,&nbsp;Frank Uhl ,&nbsp;Chris Kirtley ,&nbsp;Veronika Fialka","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00015-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives and Methods</strong><span>: Isometric, fatiguing knee-extensions at 30%, 50% and 70% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) were performed by 18 healthy human subjects. Surface electromyographic (SEMG) activity was recorded from the mono-articular vastus<span> medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles, and the bi-articular rectus femoris muscle<span> (RF). To make the bi-articular muscle work under (1) constant and (2) similar working conditions as the two mono-articulars do, the hip was fixed in a flexed position. The root mean square (RMS) SEMG recorded during fatigue was standardized to the respective values of MVC. The mean coefficients of regression of the RMS and median frequency (MF) changes were then analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance. </span></span></span><strong>Results</strong>: The load effect upon the muscle fatigue changes, as measured by increase in RMS EMG, differed between the bi-articular muscle and the two mono-articulars, in that the parameter dropped with maximum load for the bi-articular, whilst it remained stable or even increased for the mono-articulars. This might suggest that the mono- and bi-articular muscles have different roles in fatigue tasks where the bi-articulars function purely as mono-articulars. By contrast, such a clear dichotomy between the bi-articular RF and the two mono-articulars, VM and VL, was lacking for the fatigue parameter of MF. <strong>Conclusons</strong><span>: As these findings were confined to the changes in RMS EMG, different neuronal coding mechanisms for the mono- and bi-articular muscles in the central nervous system may be inferred.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"109 3","pages":"Pages 256-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00015-0","citationCount":"87","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EMG fatigue patterns accompanying isometric fatiguing knee-extensions are different in mono- and bi-articular muscles\",\"authors\":\"Gerold Ebenbichler ,&nbsp;Josef Kollmitzer ,&nbsp;Michael Quittan ,&nbsp;Frank Uhl ,&nbsp;Chris Kirtley ,&nbsp;Veronika Fialka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00015-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objectives and Methods</strong><span>: Isometric, fatiguing knee-extensions at 30%, 50% and 70% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) were performed by 18 healthy human subjects. Surface electromyographic (SEMG) activity was recorded from the mono-articular vastus<span> medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles, and the bi-articular rectus femoris muscle<span> (RF). To make the bi-articular muscle work under (1) constant and (2) similar working conditions as the two mono-articulars do, the hip was fixed in a flexed position. The root mean square (RMS) SEMG recorded during fatigue was standardized to the respective values of MVC. The mean coefficients of regression of the RMS and median frequency (MF) changes were then analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance. </span></span></span><strong>Results</strong>: The load effect upon the muscle fatigue changes, as measured by increase in RMS EMG, differed between the bi-articular muscle and the two mono-articulars, in that the parameter dropped with maximum load for the bi-articular, whilst it remained stable or even increased for the mono-articulars. This might suggest that the mono- and bi-articular muscles have different roles in fatigue tasks where the bi-articulars function purely as mono-articulars. By contrast, such a clear dichotomy between the bi-articular RF and the two mono-articulars, VM and VL, was lacking for the fatigue parameter of MF. <strong>Conclusons</strong><span>: As these findings were confined to the changes in RMS EMG, different neuronal coding mechanisms for the mono- and bi-articular muscles in the central nervous system may be inferred.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control\",\"volume\":\"109 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 256-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00015-0\",\"citationCount\":\"87\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

摘要

目的和方法:18名健康受试者在30%、50%和70%最大自主收缩(MVC)时进行等长疲劳膝关节伸展。记录单关节股内侧肌(VM)、股外侧肌(VL)和双关节股直肌(RF)的表面肌电图(SEMG)活动。为了使双关节肌肉在(1)恒定和(2)与两个单关节相似的工作条件下工作,将髋关节固定在屈曲位置。将疲劳期间记录的表面肌电信号均方根(RMS)标准化为各自的MVC值。采用多变量方差分析对RMS和中位频率(MF)变化的回归均值系数进行分析。结果:负荷对肌肉疲劳变化的影响,通过RMS肌电图的增加来测量,在双关节肌和两个单关节肌之间存在差异,双关节肌的参数随着最大负荷的增加而下降,而单关节肌的参数则保持稳定甚至增加。这可能表明单关节和双关节肌肉在疲劳任务中具有不同的作用,其中双关节的功能纯粹是单关节。相比之下,MF的疲劳参数缺乏双关节RF与两个单关节VM和VL之间的明确二分法。结论:由于这些发现仅限于RMS肌电图的变化,因此可以推断中枢神经系统单关节肌和双关节肌的不同神经元编码机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EMG fatigue patterns accompanying isometric fatiguing knee-extensions are different in mono- and bi-articular muscles

Objectives and Methods: Isometric, fatiguing knee-extensions at 30%, 50% and 70% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) were performed by 18 healthy human subjects. Surface electromyographic (SEMG) activity was recorded from the mono-articular vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles, and the bi-articular rectus femoris muscle (RF). To make the bi-articular muscle work under (1) constant and (2) similar working conditions as the two mono-articulars do, the hip was fixed in a flexed position. The root mean square (RMS) SEMG recorded during fatigue was standardized to the respective values of MVC. The mean coefficients of regression of the RMS and median frequency (MF) changes were then analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance. Results: The load effect upon the muscle fatigue changes, as measured by increase in RMS EMG, differed between the bi-articular muscle and the two mono-articulars, in that the parameter dropped with maximum load for the bi-articular, whilst it remained stable or even increased for the mono-articulars. This might suggest that the mono- and bi-articular muscles have different roles in fatigue tasks where the bi-articulars function purely as mono-articulars. By contrast, such a clear dichotomy between the bi-articular RF and the two mono-articulars, VM and VL, was lacking for the fatigue parameter of MF. Conclusons: As these findings were confined to the changes in RMS EMG, different neuronal coding mechanisms for the mono- and bi-articular muscles in the central nervous system may be inferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信