腹泻贝类毒素(DST)复合物及相关毒素中藻类毒素对小鼠的口服毒性。

Journal of natural toxins Pub Date : 1998-06-01
T Aune, O B Stabell, K Nordstoga, K Tjøtta
{"title":"腹泻贝类毒素(DST)复合物及相关毒素中藻类毒素对小鼠的口服毒性。","authors":"T Aune,&nbsp;O B Stabell,&nbsp;K Nordstoga,&nbsp;K Tjøtta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mussel samples from four locations along the Norweigian coast were extracted by methods for diarrheic shellfish toxins (DST) and tested by chemical and biological methods, including histopathology. All samples had previously been found to be highly toxic in mice, with symptoms indicating the presence of non-diarrheagenic toxins in the mouse bioassay. Chemical analysis revealed that the DST okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1) were present each one in one sample, but only a minor part of the total toxicity could be attributed to these toxions. In the other two samples, OA and DTX1 were absent. Incubation of the mussel extracts from all four samples with freshly prepared hepatocytes indicated the presence of unknown toxin(s) which may not be classified within the DST complex. Purified mussel samples were given to baby mice both via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections and by oral intubation. Oral toxicity was about 25-50 times lower than toxicity obtained by i.p. injections, a result in accordance with acute toxic properties of many toxins. Risk assessment of the unknown toxin(s) requires chemical identification, but the preliminary results obtained indicate a large margin of safety, based on the large amounts of mussel extracts necessary to yield toxic effects in the intestine and liver in experimental animals upon oral exposure versus human intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":16437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of natural toxins","volume":"7 2","pages":"141-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral toxicity in mice of algal toxins from the diarrheic shellfish toxin (DST) complex and associated toxins.\",\"authors\":\"T Aune,&nbsp;O B Stabell,&nbsp;K Nordstoga,&nbsp;K Tjøtta\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mussel samples from four locations along the Norweigian coast were extracted by methods for diarrheic shellfish toxins (DST) and tested by chemical and biological methods, including histopathology. All samples had previously been found to be highly toxic in mice, with symptoms indicating the presence of non-diarrheagenic toxins in the mouse bioassay. Chemical analysis revealed that the DST okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1) were present each one in one sample, but only a minor part of the total toxicity could be attributed to these toxions. In the other two samples, OA and DTX1 were absent. Incubation of the mussel extracts from all four samples with freshly prepared hepatocytes indicated the presence of unknown toxin(s) which may not be classified within the DST complex. Purified mussel samples were given to baby mice both via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections and by oral intubation. Oral toxicity was about 25-50 times lower than toxicity obtained by i.p. injections, a result in accordance with acute toxic properties of many toxins. Risk assessment of the unknown toxin(s) requires chemical identification, but the preliminary results obtained indicate a large margin of safety, based on the large amounts of mussel extracts necessary to yield toxic effects in the intestine and liver in experimental animals upon oral exposure versus human intake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of natural toxins\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"141-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of natural toxins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of natural toxins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用腹泻贝类毒素(DST)提取方法提取挪威沿海四个地点的贻贝样本,并采用包括组织病理学在内的化学和生物学方法进行检测。所有样品先前都被发现在小鼠中具有高毒性,其症状表明在小鼠生物测定中存在非致泻性毒素。化学分析表明,在一个样品中分别存在着DST冈田酸(OA)和二藻毒素-1 (DTX1),但总毒性中只有一小部分可归因于这些毒素。在另外两个样本中,OA和DTX1不存在。将所有四种样品的贻贝提取物与新鲜制备的肝细胞孵育表明存在未知毒素,这些毒素可能不属于DST复合物。纯化的贻贝样品通过腹腔注射和口服插管给予幼鼠。口服毒性比口服注射毒性低约25-50倍,这与许多毒素的急性毒性特性一致。未知毒素的风险评估需要进行化学鉴定,但初步结果表明,与人类摄入相比,口服接触贻贝提取物对实验动物的肠道和肝脏产生毒性作用所必需的大量贻贝提取物,安全边际很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral toxicity in mice of algal toxins from the diarrheic shellfish toxin (DST) complex and associated toxins.

Mussel samples from four locations along the Norweigian coast were extracted by methods for diarrheic shellfish toxins (DST) and tested by chemical and biological methods, including histopathology. All samples had previously been found to be highly toxic in mice, with symptoms indicating the presence of non-diarrheagenic toxins in the mouse bioassay. Chemical analysis revealed that the DST okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1) were present each one in one sample, but only a minor part of the total toxicity could be attributed to these toxions. In the other two samples, OA and DTX1 were absent. Incubation of the mussel extracts from all four samples with freshly prepared hepatocytes indicated the presence of unknown toxin(s) which may not be classified within the DST complex. Purified mussel samples were given to baby mice both via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections and by oral intubation. Oral toxicity was about 25-50 times lower than toxicity obtained by i.p. injections, a result in accordance with acute toxic properties of many toxins. Risk assessment of the unknown toxin(s) requires chemical identification, but the preliminary results obtained indicate a large margin of safety, based on the large amounts of mussel extracts necessary to yield toxic effects in the intestine and liver in experimental animals upon oral exposure versus human intake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信