光屈光性角膜切除术和激光原位角膜磨除术后角膜再神经支配:共聚焦视频显微镜的体内研究。

German journal of ophthalmology Pub Date : 1996-11-01
T Kauffmann, S Bodanowitz, L Hesse, P Kroll
{"title":"光屈光性角膜切除术和激光原位角膜磨除术后角膜再神经支配:共聚焦视频显微镜的体内研究。","authors":"T Kauffmann,&nbsp;S Bodanowitz,&nbsp;L Hesse,&nbsp;P Kroll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the regeneration of corneal nerves after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in vivo with a confocal videomicroscope. In all, 15 eyes that had undergone PRK and 15 eyes that had been subjected to LASIK were compared with a confocal in vivo slit-scanning video-microscope. The subepithelial nerves were observed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. In all eyes, good microscope images of the subepithelial nerve plexus could be obtained preoperatively. Because of postoperative light reflection and scattering in the treated area, subepithelial nerve-fiber regeneration could be followed satisfactorily only in seven eyes after PRK and in five eyes following LASIK. In the eyes treated with PRK, recovery of subepithelial reinnervation started from the margin of the ablation zone, being directed toward the center of the cornea. At 8 weeks postoperatively, rarefied subepithelial nerve fibers were visible at the edges, and after 3 months, single nonbranched nerve fibers could be visualized in the center of the ablation zone. At 6-8 months following PRK, subepithelial nerve regeneration seemed to be completed; however, abnormal branching and accessory thin nerve fibers were present without exception. After LASIK, corneal nerve-fiber regeneration followed the same course described for PRK except that regenerated subepithelial nerve fibers were barely visible in the center after 6 months. Further changes in nerve structure were visible for up to 12 months postoperatively. Recovery of corneal sensitivity in humans has been reported to start at 4-6 weeks after PRK and is said to be completed within 6-12 months of surgery. Slit-scanning videomicroscope findings were in accordance with these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":77146,"journal":{"name":"German journal of ophthalmology","volume":"5 6","pages":"508-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corneal reinnervation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: an in vivo study with a confocal videomicroscope.\",\"authors\":\"T Kauffmann,&nbsp;S Bodanowitz,&nbsp;L Hesse,&nbsp;P Kroll\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the regeneration of corneal nerves after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in vivo with a confocal videomicroscope. In all, 15 eyes that had undergone PRK and 15 eyes that had been subjected to LASIK were compared with a confocal in vivo slit-scanning video-microscope. The subepithelial nerves were observed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. In all eyes, good microscope images of the subepithelial nerve plexus could be obtained preoperatively. Because of postoperative light reflection and scattering in the treated area, subepithelial nerve-fiber regeneration could be followed satisfactorily only in seven eyes after PRK and in five eyes following LASIK. In the eyes treated with PRK, recovery of subepithelial reinnervation started from the margin of the ablation zone, being directed toward the center of the cornea. At 8 weeks postoperatively, rarefied subepithelial nerve fibers were visible at the edges, and after 3 months, single nonbranched nerve fibers could be visualized in the center of the ablation zone. At 6-8 months following PRK, subepithelial nerve regeneration seemed to be completed; however, abnormal branching and accessory thin nerve fibers were present without exception. After LASIK, corneal nerve-fiber regeneration followed the same course described for PRK except that regenerated subepithelial nerve fibers were barely visible in the center after 6 months. Further changes in nerve structure were visible for up to 12 months postoperatively. Recovery of corneal sensitivity in humans has been reported to start at 4-6 weeks after PRK and is said to be completed within 6-12 months of surgery. Slit-scanning videomicroscope findings were in accordance with these observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"508-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在共聚焦视频显微镜下比较光屈光性角膜切除术(PRK)和激光原位角膜磨除术(LASIK)后角膜神经的再生。总共有15只接受过PRK手术的眼睛和15只接受过LASIK手术的眼睛在共聚焦体内裂隙扫描视频显微镜下进行了比较。分别于术前、术后3、6、12个月观察上皮下神经。术前所有眼均可获得良好的上皮下神经丛显微镜图像。由于术后治疗区域的光反射和散射,只有7只眼PRK术后和5只眼LASIK术后上皮下神经纤维再生满意。在接受PRK治疗的眼睛中,上皮下再神经支配的恢复从消融区边缘开始,朝向角膜中心。术后8周,边缘可见稀疏的上皮下神经纤维,3个月后,消融区中心可见单根无分支神经纤维。在PRK后6-8个月,上皮下神经再生似乎完成了;但无异常分支及副细神经纤维。LASIK术后,角膜神经纤维再生遵循与PRK相同的过程,只是再生的上皮下神经纤维在6个月后在中心几乎看不到。术后12个月可见神经结构的进一步变化。据报道,人类角膜敏感性的恢复始于PRK术后4-6周,并在手术后6-12个月内完成。裂隙扫描视频显微镜的发现与这些观察结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corneal reinnervation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: an in vivo study with a confocal videomicroscope.

The purpose of this study was to compare the regeneration of corneal nerves after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in vivo with a confocal videomicroscope. In all, 15 eyes that had undergone PRK and 15 eyes that had been subjected to LASIK were compared with a confocal in vivo slit-scanning video-microscope. The subepithelial nerves were observed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. In all eyes, good microscope images of the subepithelial nerve plexus could be obtained preoperatively. Because of postoperative light reflection and scattering in the treated area, subepithelial nerve-fiber regeneration could be followed satisfactorily only in seven eyes after PRK and in five eyes following LASIK. In the eyes treated with PRK, recovery of subepithelial reinnervation started from the margin of the ablation zone, being directed toward the center of the cornea. At 8 weeks postoperatively, rarefied subepithelial nerve fibers were visible at the edges, and after 3 months, single nonbranched nerve fibers could be visualized in the center of the ablation zone. At 6-8 months following PRK, subepithelial nerve regeneration seemed to be completed; however, abnormal branching and accessory thin nerve fibers were present without exception. After LASIK, corneal nerve-fiber regeneration followed the same course described for PRK except that regenerated subepithelial nerve fibers were barely visible in the center after 6 months. Further changes in nerve structure were visible for up to 12 months postoperatively. Recovery of corneal sensitivity in humans has been reported to start at 4-6 weeks after PRK and is said to be completed within 6-12 months of surgery. Slit-scanning videomicroscope findings were in accordance with these observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信