光屈光性角膜切除术后角膜神经再生的共聚焦电镜观察。

German journal of ophthalmology Pub Date : 1996-11-01
P Heinz, S Bodanowitz, W Wiegand, P Kroll
{"title":"光屈光性角膜切除术后角膜神经再生的共聚焦电镜观察。","authors":"P Heinz,&nbsp;S Bodanowitz,&nbsp;W Wiegand,&nbsp;P Kroll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to study corneal nerve regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in vivo by means of a confocal videomicroscope. A total of 25 myopic eyes of 16 patients were examined biomicroscopically and with the confocal microscope (Microphthal, Hund Company, Wetzlar, Germany) before and after PRK. The mean age of the patients was 30.4 (range 21-44) years, the mean follow-up period was 13.7 (11.0-15.1) months, the mean preoperative refraction was -5.5 (-1.75 to -9.0) D, the mean amount of attempted correction was -4.75 (-1.75 to -7.5) D, the mean ablation depth was 50 (30-75) microns, and the single central ablation zone measured 6.0 mm in diameter. The postoperative refractive and visual outcome was favorable in most eyes. The mean postoperative refraction was -0.5 (-2.75 to + 0.5) D. Among the 25 eyes, 22 (88%) had +/- 1.0 D of attempted correction at 1 year and only 2 eyes showed a loss of 2 Snellen lines. Despite increased light scattering and reflection due to haze, sufficient postoperative imaging of the corneal nerve architecture was possible in all cases. Recovery of corneal innervation started from the margin of the ablation, being directed toward the center of the cornea and the epithelium. At 5-8 months following PRK, stromal nerves and the subepithelial nerve plexus took on their definite appearance. The original nerve structure was not reestablished, abnormal branching and accessory thin nerve fibers being present without exception. Confocal slit-scanning video-microscopy is a very useful technique for in vivo investigation of corneal nerve regeneration after PRK and, presumably, other keratorefractive procedures. In comparison with histology studies in animals, reinnervation of the human cornea after PRK seems to be completed earlier but follows the same morphologic principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":77146,"journal":{"name":"German journal of ophthalmology","volume":"5 6","pages":"373-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo observation of corneal nerve regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy with a confocal videomicroscope.\",\"authors\":\"P Heinz,&nbsp;S Bodanowitz,&nbsp;W Wiegand,&nbsp;P Kroll\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to study corneal nerve regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in vivo by means of a confocal videomicroscope. A total of 25 myopic eyes of 16 patients were examined biomicroscopically and with the confocal microscope (Microphthal, Hund Company, Wetzlar, Germany) before and after PRK. The mean age of the patients was 30.4 (range 21-44) years, the mean follow-up period was 13.7 (11.0-15.1) months, the mean preoperative refraction was -5.5 (-1.75 to -9.0) D, the mean amount of attempted correction was -4.75 (-1.75 to -7.5) D, the mean ablation depth was 50 (30-75) microns, and the single central ablation zone measured 6.0 mm in diameter. The postoperative refractive and visual outcome was favorable in most eyes. The mean postoperative refraction was -0.5 (-2.75 to + 0.5) D. Among the 25 eyes, 22 (88%) had +/- 1.0 D of attempted correction at 1 year and only 2 eyes showed a loss of 2 Snellen lines. Despite increased light scattering and reflection due to haze, sufficient postoperative imaging of the corneal nerve architecture was possible in all cases. Recovery of corneal innervation started from the margin of the ablation, being directed toward the center of the cornea and the epithelium. At 5-8 months following PRK, stromal nerves and the subepithelial nerve plexus took on their definite appearance. The original nerve structure was not reestablished, abnormal branching and accessory thin nerve fibers being present without exception. Confocal slit-scanning video-microscopy is a very useful technique for in vivo investigation of corneal nerve regeneration after PRK and, presumably, other keratorefractive procedures. In comparison with histology studies in animals, reinnervation of the human cornea after PRK seems to be completed earlier but follows the same morphologic principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"373-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用共聚焦视频显微镜研究光屈光性角膜切除术(PRK)后角膜神经的体内再生。采用共聚焦显微镜(Microphthal, Hund Company, Wetzlar, Germany)对16例25只近视眼在PRK前后进行了生物显微镜和共聚焦显微镜检查。患者平均年龄30.4岁(21 ~ 44岁),平均随访时间13.7(11.0 ~ 15.1)个月,平均术前屈光度-5.5 (-1.75 ~ -9.0)D,平均矫正尝试量-4.75 (-1.75 ~ -7.5)D,平均消融深度50(30 ~ 75)微米,单个中心消融区直径6.0 mm。术后大多数眼屈光和视力结果良好。术后平均屈光度为-0.5 (-2.75 ~ + 0.5)D。25只眼中,22只(88%)眼在1年内有+/- 1.0 D的矫正尝试,仅有2只眼出现2条斯伦线缺失。尽管由于雾霾增加了光散射和反射,但在所有病例中,术后都可以对角膜神经结构进行充分的成像。角膜神经支配的恢复从消融边缘开始,朝向角膜中心和上皮。在PRK后5-8个月,间质神经和上皮下神经丛呈现明确的外观。原有神经结构未重建,无异常分支及副细神经纤维。共聚焦狭缝扫描视频显微镜是一种非常有用的技术,可用于PRK术后角膜神经再生的体内研究,也可用于其他角膜屈光手术。与动物的组织学研究相比,人类角膜PRK后的再神经支配似乎完成得更早,但遵循相同的形态学原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vivo observation of corneal nerve regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy with a confocal videomicroscope.

The aim of the present study was to study corneal nerve regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in vivo by means of a confocal videomicroscope. A total of 25 myopic eyes of 16 patients were examined biomicroscopically and with the confocal microscope (Microphthal, Hund Company, Wetzlar, Germany) before and after PRK. The mean age of the patients was 30.4 (range 21-44) years, the mean follow-up period was 13.7 (11.0-15.1) months, the mean preoperative refraction was -5.5 (-1.75 to -9.0) D, the mean amount of attempted correction was -4.75 (-1.75 to -7.5) D, the mean ablation depth was 50 (30-75) microns, and the single central ablation zone measured 6.0 mm in diameter. The postoperative refractive and visual outcome was favorable in most eyes. The mean postoperative refraction was -0.5 (-2.75 to + 0.5) D. Among the 25 eyes, 22 (88%) had +/- 1.0 D of attempted correction at 1 year and only 2 eyes showed a loss of 2 Snellen lines. Despite increased light scattering and reflection due to haze, sufficient postoperative imaging of the corneal nerve architecture was possible in all cases. Recovery of corneal innervation started from the margin of the ablation, being directed toward the center of the cornea and the epithelium. At 5-8 months following PRK, stromal nerves and the subepithelial nerve plexus took on their definite appearance. The original nerve structure was not reestablished, abnormal branching and accessory thin nerve fibers being present without exception. Confocal slit-scanning video-microscopy is a very useful technique for in vivo investigation of corneal nerve regeneration after PRK and, presumably, other keratorefractive procedures. In comparison with histology studies in animals, reinnervation of the human cornea after PRK seems to be completed earlier but follows the same morphologic principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信