{"title":"中热条件下主动和被动预热对能源系统贡献和性能的比较。","authors":"B O'Brien, W Payne, P Gastin, C Burge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of either an active warm up (AWU) or a passive warm up (PWU) on performance and energy system contribution in a moderately hot ambient environment (30 degrees C, 50% Relative humidity) was investigated. The AWU procedure involved exercise at 100% VO2 max followed by four 30 sec efforts at 100% of VO2 max and the PWU involved the application of heat pads to the quadriceps for 60 min. Following either warm up procedure, (randomized cross over design) a 60 s supramaximal test on a Monark bicycle ergometer was performed. The AWU procedure elicited the greatest average power output (0-30 s: 669 +/- 28 W vs 645 +/- 30 W, p < 0.05) and (0-60 s 529 +/- 20 W vs 513 +/- 20 W, p < 0.05), the greatest peak power output (917 +/- 45 W vs 880 +/- 46 W, p < 0.01) and VO2 peak during the initial 30 s (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 1.2 +/- 0.1 l.min-1, p < 0.01) and over the duration of the 60 s test (3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 2.9 +/- 0.2 l.min-1, p < 0.05). The estimated anaerobic energy release was not significantly different between the trials. The performance benefits of an AWU occurred within the first 30 s of exercise as there was no significant differences in average power output or VO2 peak in the final 30 s of exercise. In conclusion, an AWU enhances sprinting performance in a moderately hot ambient environment, despite a higher rectal temperature than a PWU. The increased power output is derived from greater oxygen consumption in the initial stages of exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":79393,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":"29 4","pages":"106-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of active and passive warm ups on energy system contribution and performance in moderate heat.\",\"authors\":\"B O'Brien, W Payne, P Gastin, C Burge\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effect of either an active warm up (AWU) or a passive warm up (PWU) on performance and energy system contribution in a moderately hot ambient environment (30 degrees C, 50% Relative humidity) was investigated. The AWU procedure involved exercise at 100% VO2 max followed by four 30 sec efforts at 100% of VO2 max and the PWU involved the application of heat pads to the quadriceps for 60 min. Following either warm up procedure, (randomized cross over design) a 60 s supramaximal test on a Monark bicycle ergometer was performed. The AWU procedure elicited the greatest average power output (0-30 s: 669 +/- 28 W vs 645 +/- 30 W, p < 0.05) and (0-60 s 529 +/- 20 W vs 513 +/- 20 W, p < 0.05), the greatest peak power output (917 +/- 45 W vs 880 +/- 46 W, p < 0.01) and VO2 peak during the initial 30 s (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 1.2 +/- 0.1 l.min-1, p < 0.01) and over the duration of the 60 s test (3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 2.9 +/- 0.2 l.min-1, p < 0.05). The estimated anaerobic energy release was not significantly different between the trials. The performance benefits of an AWU occurred within the first 30 s of exercise as there was no significant differences in average power output or VO2 peak in the final 30 s of exercise. In conclusion, an AWU enhances sprinting performance in a moderately hot ambient environment, despite a higher rectal temperature than a PWU. The increased power output is derived from greater oxygen consumption in the initial stages of exercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"106-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究了在中等高温环境(30℃,50%相对湿度)下,主动预热(AWU)或被动预热(PWU)对性能和能源系统贡献的影响。AWU程序包括在100% VO2 max下进行运动,然后在100% VO2 max下进行4次30秒的运动,PWU包括在股四头肌上应用热垫60分钟。在任何一个热身程序之后,(随机交叉设计)在Monark自行车测力仪上进行60秒的最大测试。原子量单位过程引起的最大平均功率输出(0 30年代:669 + / - 28 W vs 645 + / - 30 W、p < 0.05)和(0-60 s 529 + / - 20 W vs 513 + / - 20 W, p < 0.05),最大峰值功率输出(917 + / - 45 W vs 880 + / - 46 W, p < 0.01)和最大峰值在最初的30年代(1.4 + / - 0.1 vs 1.2 + / - 0.1 l.min-1, p < 0.01), 60年代测试的持续时间(3.2 + / - 0.1 vs 2.9 + / - 0.2 l.min-1, p < 0.05)。估计厌氧能量释放在试验之间没有显著差异。AWU的性能优势出现在运动的前30秒,因为在运动的最后30秒,平均功率输出或VO2峰值没有显着差异。总之,尽管直肠温度比PWU高,但AWU在中等温度的环境中可以提高短跑性能。在运动的最初阶段,增加的能量输出来源于更多的氧气消耗。
A comparison of active and passive warm ups on energy system contribution and performance in moderate heat.
The effect of either an active warm up (AWU) or a passive warm up (PWU) on performance and energy system contribution in a moderately hot ambient environment (30 degrees C, 50% Relative humidity) was investigated. The AWU procedure involved exercise at 100% VO2 max followed by four 30 sec efforts at 100% of VO2 max and the PWU involved the application of heat pads to the quadriceps for 60 min. Following either warm up procedure, (randomized cross over design) a 60 s supramaximal test on a Monark bicycle ergometer was performed. The AWU procedure elicited the greatest average power output (0-30 s: 669 +/- 28 W vs 645 +/- 30 W, p < 0.05) and (0-60 s 529 +/- 20 W vs 513 +/- 20 W, p < 0.05), the greatest peak power output (917 +/- 45 W vs 880 +/- 46 W, p < 0.01) and VO2 peak during the initial 30 s (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 1.2 +/- 0.1 l.min-1, p < 0.01) and over the duration of the 60 s test (3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 2.9 +/- 0.2 l.min-1, p < 0.05). The estimated anaerobic energy release was not significantly different between the trials. The performance benefits of an AWU occurred within the first 30 s of exercise as there was no significant differences in average power output or VO2 peak in the final 30 s of exercise. In conclusion, an AWU enhances sprinting performance in a moderately hot ambient environment, despite a higher rectal temperature than a PWU. The increased power output is derived from greater oxygen consumption in the initial stages of exercise.