电子表单:基于万维网的数据输入方法的优点和缺点。

S N Luxenberg, D D DuBois, C G Fraley, R R Hamburgh, X L Huang, P D Clayton
{"title":"电子表单:基于万维网的数据输入方法的优点和缺点。","authors":"S N Luxenberg,&nbsp;D D DuBois,&nbsp;C G Fraley,&nbsp;R R Hamburgh,&nbsp;X L Huang,&nbsp;P D Clayton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has long been realized that, compared to paper-based records, electronic record systems provide many advantages in the healthcare environment, including increased availability, improved legibility, long-term accessibility, (potentially) greater completeness, data encoding, and automated decision support and analysis. In spite of these recognized benefits, collection of patient data at the point of service generally does not occur, in large part because each such effort usually requires application-specific software and hardware, and, most significantly, provider time. Given the presence of WWW browsers now available on nearly every desktop, the support and access concerns for data entry applications can be substantially lessened. Despite these advantages, there are also downsides to the use of the WWW for data entry, including user interface issues and security. At CPMC, we are currently using web-based forms to gather patient charge data from physical and occupational therapists. Benefits of this approach have included a 98.2% user compliance rate for at least weekly data entry, and the reduction of charge posting from an average of 24.3 days to 2.3 days following the date of service. Drawbacks to WWW-based applications have included increased security exposure and persistent human tendencies to enter data in batches rather than at the time of service. A final conclusion was that, in the absence of a strong central mandate, providers must perceive a clear benefit in order to be willing to learn and use a new technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":79455,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","volume":" ","pages":"804-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233373/pdf/procamiaafs00001-0838.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic forms: benefits drawbacks of a World Wide Web-based approach to data entry.\",\"authors\":\"S N Luxenberg,&nbsp;D D DuBois,&nbsp;C G Fraley,&nbsp;R R Hamburgh,&nbsp;X L Huang,&nbsp;P D Clayton\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It has long been realized that, compared to paper-based records, electronic record systems provide many advantages in the healthcare environment, including increased availability, improved legibility, long-term accessibility, (potentially) greater completeness, data encoding, and automated decision support and analysis. In spite of these recognized benefits, collection of patient data at the point of service generally does not occur, in large part because each such effort usually requires application-specific software and hardware, and, most significantly, provider time. Given the presence of WWW browsers now available on nearly every desktop, the support and access concerns for data entry applications can be substantially lessened. Despite these advantages, there are also downsides to the use of the WWW for data entry, including user interface issues and security. At CPMC, we are currently using web-based forms to gather patient charge data from physical and occupational therapists. Benefits of this approach have included a 98.2% user compliance rate for at least weekly data entry, and the reduction of charge posting from an average of 24.3 days to 2.3 days following the date of service. Drawbacks to WWW-based applications have included increased security exposure and persistent human tendencies to enter data in batches rather than at the time of service. A final conclusion was that, in the absence of a strong central mandate, providers must perceive a clear benefit in order to be willing to learn and use a new technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"804-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233373/pdf/procamiaafs00001-0838.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们早就认识到,与基于纸张的记录相比,电子记录系统在医疗保健环境中提供了许多优势,包括更高的可用性、更好的易读性、长期可访问性、(潜在的)更高的完整性、数据编码以及自动化决策支持和分析。尽管有这些公认的好处,但通常不会在服务点收集患者数据,这在很大程度上是因为每次这样的工作通常需要特定于应用程序的软件和硬件,而且最重要的是,需要提供者的时间。由于现在几乎每个桌面上都有可用的WWW浏览器,因此数据输入应用程序的支持和访问问题可以大大减少。尽管有这些优点,使用WWW进行数据输入也有缺点,包括用户界面问题和安全性。在CPMC,我们目前使用基于网络的表格从物理和职业治疗师那里收集患者收费数据。这种方法的好处包括98.2%的用户遵从率,至少每周输入数据,并将收费从服务日期后的平均24.3天减少到2.3天。基于www的应用程序的缺点包括增加了安全性,以及人们总是倾向于批量输入数据,而不是在服务时输入数据。最后的结论是,在缺乏强有力的中央授权的情况下,提供者必须认识到明确的利益,以便愿意学习和使用新技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic forms: benefits drawbacks of a World Wide Web-based approach to data entry.

It has long been realized that, compared to paper-based records, electronic record systems provide many advantages in the healthcare environment, including increased availability, improved legibility, long-term accessibility, (potentially) greater completeness, data encoding, and automated decision support and analysis. In spite of these recognized benefits, collection of patient data at the point of service generally does not occur, in large part because each such effort usually requires application-specific software and hardware, and, most significantly, provider time. Given the presence of WWW browsers now available on nearly every desktop, the support and access concerns for data entry applications can be substantially lessened. Despite these advantages, there are also downsides to the use of the WWW for data entry, including user interface issues and security. At CPMC, we are currently using web-based forms to gather patient charge data from physical and occupational therapists. Benefits of this approach have included a 98.2% user compliance rate for at least weekly data entry, and the reduction of charge posting from an average of 24.3 days to 2.3 days following the date of service. Drawbacks to WWW-based applications have included increased security exposure and persistent human tendencies to enter data in batches rather than at the time of service. A final conclusion was that, in the absence of a strong central mandate, providers must perceive a clear benefit in order to be willing to learn and use a new technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信