细针穿刺甲状腺结节

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mary K. Sidawy M.D., David M. Del Vecchio M.D., Stanley M. Knoll M.D.
{"title":"细针穿刺甲状腺结节","authors":"Mary K. Sidawy M.D.,&nbsp;David M. Del Vecchio M.D.,&nbsp;Stanley M. Knoll M.D.","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970825)81:4<253::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-Q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and to determine the reasons for the discrepancies between the cytologic and histologic diagnoses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>The authors evaluated the cytologic and histologic results of 133 FNAs obtained from 92 patients who underwent subsequent thyroidectomies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The initial cytologic results were indeterminate in 39 of 133 cases (29%) because a neoplasm could not be ruled out. These cases corresponded histologically to 9 adenomatoid nodules (ANs), 14 follicular adenomas (FAs), and 16 malignant thyroid neoplasms. The reported FNA diagnoses of the remaining 94 cases (71%) were 48 ANs, 19 follicular neoplasms (FNs), 21 papillary carcinomas (PCs), and 6 cases of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). Correlation of cytology and histology showed that 69 of 94 FNA results (73%) correlated with the histologic diagnoses, whereas 25 (27%) were discrepant. The discrepancies resulted from cytodiagnostic errors in 13 cases (52%), suboptimal smears in 11 (44%), and an FNA sampling error in 1 (4%). The false-negative rate of FNA was 19% and the false-positive rate was 6%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic pitfalls and indeterminate FNA diagnoses were predominantly due to overlapping cytologic criteria between ANs, FNs, and follicular variants of PCs. Rendering a definite diagnosis on suboptimal FNA samples is also a significant source of pitfalls. <i>Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)</i> 1997; 81:253-9. © <i>1997 American Cancer Society.</i></p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":"81 4","pages":"253-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0142%2819970825%2981%3A4%3C253%3A%3AAID-CNCR7%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q","citationCount":"131","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules\",\"authors\":\"Mary K. Sidawy M.D.,&nbsp;David M. Del Vecchio M.D.,&nbsp;Stanley M. Knoll M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970825)81:4<253::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-Q\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and to determine the reasons for the discrepancies between the cytologic and histologic diagnoses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>The authors evaluated the cytologic and histologic results of 133 FNAs obtained from 92 patients who underwent subsequent thyroidectomies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>The initial cytologic results were indeterminate in 39 of 133 cases (29%) because a neoplasm could not be ruled out. These cases corresponded histologically to 9 adenomatoid nodules (ANs), 14 follicular adenomas (FAs), and 16 malignant thyroid neoplasms. The reported FNA diagnoses of the remaining 94 cases (71%) were 48 ANs, 19 follicular neoplasms (FNs), 21 papillary carcinomas (PCs), and 6 cases of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). Correlation of cytology and histology showed that 69 of 94 FNA results (73%) correlated with the histologic diagnoses, whereas 25 (27%) were discrepant. The discrepancies resulted from cytodiagnostic errors in 13 cases (52%), suboptimal smears in 11 (44%), and an FNA sampling error in 1 (4%). The false-negative rate of FNA was 19% and the false-positive rate was 6%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diagnostic pitfalls and indeterminate FNA diagnoses were predominantly due to overlapping cytologic criteria between ANs, FNs, and follicular variants of PCs. Rendering a definite diagnosis on suboptimal FNA samples is also a significant source of pitfalls. <i>Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)</i> 1997; 81:253-9. © <i>1997 American Cancer Society.</i></p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\"81 4\",\"pages\":\"253-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0142%2819970825%2981%3A4%3C253%3A%3AAID-CNCR7%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q\",\"citationCount\":\"131\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0142%2819970825%2981%3A4%3C253%3A%3AAID-CNCR7%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0142%2819970825%2981%3A4%3C253%3A%3AAID-CNCR7%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 131

摘要

本研究的目的是评估甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)的结果,并确定细胞学和组织学诊断之间差异的原因。方法:作者评估了92例甲状腺切除术患者的133个FNAs的细胞学和组织学结果。结果133例患者中有39例(29%)的初始细胞学结果不确定,因为不能排除肿瘤。这些病例在组织学上对应9例腺瘤样结节(ANs), 14例滤泡性腺瘤(FAs)和16例恶性甲状腺肿瘤。其余94例(71%)的FNA诊断为ANs 48例,滤泡性肿瘤(FNs) 19例,乳头状癌(PCs) 21例,桥本甲状腺炎(HT) 6例。细胞学和组织学的相关性显示94个FNA结果中有69个(73%)与组织学诊断相关,而25个(27%)不一致。差异源于13例(52%)细胞诊断错误,11例(44%)涂片不理想,1例(4%)FNA抽样错误。FNA假阴性率为19%,假阳性率为6%。结论:诊断缺陷和不确定的FNA诊断主要是由于ANs、FNs和PCs的滤泡变异之间的细胞学标准重叠。对次优FNA样本进行明确诊断也是陷阱的重要来源。癌症(癌症细胞酚)1997;81:253-9。©1997美国癌症协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules

Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and to determine the reasons for the discrepancies between the cytologic and histologic diagnoses.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the cytologic and histologic results of 133 FNAs obtained from 92 patients who underwent subsequent thyroidectomies.

RESULTS

The initial cytologic results were indeterminate in 39 of 133 cases (29%) because a neoplasm could not be ruled out. These cases corresponded histologically to 9 adenomatoid nodules (ANs), 14 follicular adenomas (FAs), and 16 malignant thyroid neoplasms. The reported FNA diagnoses of the remaining 94 cases (71%) were 48 ANs, 19 follicular neoplasms (FNs), 21 papillary carcinomas (PCs), and 6 cases of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). Correlation of cytology and histology showed that 69 of 94 FNA results (73%) correlated with the histologic diagnoses, whereas 25 (27%) were discrepant. The discrepancies resulted from cytodiagnostic errors in 13 cases (52%), suboptimal smears in 11 (44%), and an FNA sampling error in 1 (4%). The false-negative rate of FNA was 19% and the false-positive rate was 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic pitfalls and indeterminate FNA diagnoses were predominantly due to overlapping cytologic criteria between ANs, FNs, and follicular variants of PCs. Rendering a definite diagnosis on suboptimal FNA samples is also a significant source of pitfalls. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1997; 81:253-9. © 1997 American Cancer Society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Cytopathology
Cancer Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信