RDC、DSM-III、DSM-III- r诊断标准对广泛性焦虑障碍的比较

Susan I. Wolk, Ewald Horwath, Rise B. Goldstein, Priya Wickramaratne, Myrna M. Weissman
{"title":"RDC、DSM-III、DSM-III- r诊断标准对广泛性焦虑障碍的比较","authors":"Susan I. Wolk,&nbsp;Ewald Horwath,&nbsp;Rise B. Goldstein,&nbsp;Priya Wickramaratne,&nbsp;Myrna M. Weissman","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has been controversial since its inception. It remains unclear whether more stringent diagnostic criteria, such as in DSM-III-R, have improved the validity of GAD. Family studies suggest that GAD aggregates at least weakly in families of probands with GAD, and support the separation of panic disorder (PD) and GAD. Therefore, we can use a family study design to examine the validity of GAD. Independent familial transmission of GAD supports the validity of GAD. We report here the risk of GAD according to RDC, DSM-III, and DSM-III-R criteria in the first-degree relatives of probands from four diagnostic groups: panic disorder, panic disorder with major depression, early-onset major depression (MDD), and normal controls. We did not find an elevated risk of DSM-III or DSM-III-R GAD in the relatives of any of the ill proband groups compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill when controlling for proband comorbidity for GAD. In contrast, RDC GAD aggregates in the first-degree relatives of probands from both of the PD proband groups (with and without MDD) compared to relatives of the normal control group. The inclusion of cases of subsyndromal panic attacks that did not meet the strict RDC for panic disorder as meeting the less restrictive RDC for GAD may partially account for the familial aggregation of RDC panic disorder and RDC GAD. RDC GAD seems to identify one or more syndrome(s) that may be on the familial spectrum of panic disorder. This syndrome may represent a mild or early variant of panic disorder. We also found a trend for RDC and DSM-III GAD to aggregate in the first-degree relatives of the MDD proband group compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill controls. These data suggest that GAD demonstrates more independent familial transmission from PD and MDD when defined by DSM-III-R criteria than when defined by RDC or DSM-III, and thus support the validity of DSM-III-R GAD. Anxiety 2:71–79 (1996).</i> © <i>1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":79474,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety","volume":"2 2","pages":"71-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of RDC, DSM-III, DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder\",\"authors\":\"Susan I. Wolk,&nbsp;Ewald Horwath,&nbsp;Rise B. Goldstein,&nbsp;Priya Wickramaratne,&nbsp;Myrna M. Weissman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has been controversial since its inception. It remains unclear whether more stringent diagnostic criteria, such as in DSM-III-R, have improved the validity of GAD. Family studies suggest that GAD aggregates at least weakly in families of probands with GAD, and support the separation of panic disorder (PD) and GAD. Therefore, we can use a family study design to examine the validity of GAD. Independent familial transmission of GAD supports the validity of GAD. We report here the risk of GAD according to RDC, DSM-III, and DSM-III-R criteria in the first-degree relatives of probands from four diagnostic groups: panic disorder, panic disorder with major depression, early-onset major depression (MDD), and normal controls. We did not find an elevated risk of DSM-III or DSM-III-R GAD in the relatives of any of the ill proband groups compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill when controlling for proband comorbidity for GAD. In contrast, RDC GAD aggregates in the first-degree relatives of probands from both of the PD proband groups (with and without MDD) compared to relatives of the normal control group. The inclusion of cases of subsyndromal panic attacks that did not meet the strict RDC for panic disorder as meeting the less restrictive RDC for GAD may partially account for the familial aggregation of RDC panic disorder and RDC GAD. RDC GAD seems to identify one or more syndrome(s) that may be on the familial spectrum of panic disorder. This syndrome may represent a mild or early variant of panic disorder. We also found a trend for RDC and DSM-III GAD to aggregate in the first-degree relatives of the MDD proband group compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill controls. These data suggest that GAD demonstrates more independent familial transmission from PD and MDD when defined by DSM-III-R criteria than when defined by RDC or DSM-III, and thus support the validity of DSM-III-R GAD. Anxiety 2:71–79 (1996).</i> © <i>1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"71-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7154%281996%292%3A2%3C71%3A%3AAID-ANXI2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7154%281996%292%3A2%3C71%3A%3AAID-ANXI2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的诊断从一开始就存在争议。目前尚不清楚更严格的诊断标准,如DSM-III-R,是否提高了广泛性焦虑症的有效性。家庭研究表明,广泛性焦虑症在先证者有广泛性焦虑症的家庭中至少较弱地聚集,这支持了恐慌障碍(PD)和广泛性焦虑症的分离。因此,我们可以使用家庭研究设计来检验广泛性焦虑症的有效性。GAD的独立家族遗传支持了GAD的有效性。根据RDC、DSM-III和DSM-III- r标准,我们报告了四组先证的一级亲属患广泛性焦虑症的风险:惊恐障碍、惊恐障碍伴重度抑郁症、早发性重度抑郁症(MDD)和正常对照。在控制先证者患广泛性焦虑症的合并症时,我们没有发现任何患病先证者的亲属患DSM-III或DSM-III- r广泛性焦虑症的风险比从未患过精神疾病的亲属高。相比之下,与正常对照组的亲属相比,PD先证者组(有或没有MDD)的先证者的一级亲属中RDC GAD聚集。将不符合严格的惊恐障碍RDC的亚综合征惊恐发作病例纳入符合限制性较弱的GAD RDC的病例可能部分解释了RDC惊恐障碍和RDC GAD的家族聚集性。RDC广泛性焦虑症似乎确定了一种或多种可能属于惊恐障碍家族谱系的综合征。这种综合征可能是恐慌症的一种轻度或早期变体。我们还发现,与从未患过精神疾病的对照组的亲属相比,MDD先证组的一级亲属中RDC和DSM-III GAD有聚集的趋势。这些数据表明,与RDC或DSM-III定义的GAD相比,DSM-III- r定义的GAD更独立于PD和MDD的家族性传播,从而支持了DSM-III- r GAD的有效性。焦虑:71 - 79(1996)。©1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of RDC, DSM-III, DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder

The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has been controversial since its inception. It remains unclear whether more stringent diagnostic criteria, such as in DSM-III-R, have improved the validity of GAD. Family studies suggest that GAD aggregates at least weakly in families of probands with GAD, and support the separation of panic disorder (PD) and GAD. Therefore, we can use a family study design to examine the validity of GAD. Independent familial transmission of GAD supports the validity of GAD. We report here the risk of GAD according to RDC, DSM-III, and DSM-III-R criteria in the first-degree relatives of probands from four diagnostic groups: panic disorder, panic disorder with major depression, early-onset major depression (MDD), and normal controls. We did not find an elevated risk of DSM-III or DSM-III-R GAD in the relatives of any of the ill proband groups compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill when controlling for proband comorbidity for GAD. In contrast, RDC GAD aggregates in the first-degree relatives of probands from both of the PD proband groups (with and without MDD) compared to relatives of the normal control group. The inclusion of cases of subsyndromal panic attacks that did not meet the strict RDC for panic disorder as meeting the less restrictive RDC for GAD may partially account for the familial aggregation of RDC panic disorder and RDC GAD. RDC GAD seems to identify one or more syndrome(s) that may be on the familial spectrum of panic disorder. This syndrome may represent a mild or early variant of panic disorder. We also found a trend for RDC and DSM-III GAD to aggregate in the first-degree relatives of the MDD proband group compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill controls. These data suggest that GAD demonstrates more independent familial transmission from PD and MDD when defined by DSM-III-R criteria than when defined by RDC or DSM-III, and thus support the validity of DSM-III-R GAD. Anxiety 2:71–79 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信