Susan I. Wolk, Ewald Horwath, Rise B. Goldstein, Priya Wickramaratne, Myrna M. Weissman
{"title":"RDC、DSM-III、DSM-III- r诊断标准对广泛性焦虑障碍的比较","authors":"Susan I. Wolk, Ewald Horwath, Rise B. Goldstein, Priya Wickramaratne, Myrna M. Weissman","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has been controversial since its inception. It remains unclear whether more stringent diagnostic criteria, such as in DSM-III-R, have improved the validity of GAD. Family studies suggest that GAD aggregates at least weakly in families of probands with GAD, and support the separation of panic disorder (PD) and GAD. Therefore, we can use a family study design to examine the validity of GAD. Independent familial transmission of GAD supports the validity of GAD. We report here the risk of GAD according to RDC, DSM-III, and DSM-III-R criteria in the first-degree relatives of probands from four diagnostic groups: panic disorder, panic disorder with major depression, early-onset major depression (MDD), and normal controls. We did not find an elevated risk of DSM-III or DSM-III-R GAD in the relatives of any of the ill proband groups compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill when controlling for proband comorbidity for GAD. In contrast, RDC GAD aggregates in the first-degree relatives of probands from both of the PD proband groups (with and without MDD) compared to relatives of the normal control group. The inclusion of cases of subsyndromal panic attacks that did not meet the strict RDC for panic disorder as meeting the less restrictive RDC for GAD may partially account for the familial aggregation of RDC panic disorder and RDC GAD. RDC GAD seems to identify one or more syndrome(s) that may be on the familial spectrum of panic disorder. This syndrome may represent a mild or early variant of panic disorder. We also found a trend for RDC and DSM-III GAD to aggregate in the first-degree relatives of the MDD proband group compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill controls. These data suggest that GAD demonstrates more independent familial transmission from PD and MDD when defined by DSM-III-R criteria than when defined by RDC or DSM-III, and thus support the validity of DSM-III-R GAD. Anxiety 2:71–79 (1996).</i> © <i>1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":79474,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety","volume":"2 2","pages":"71-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of RDC, DSM-III, DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder\",\"authors\":\"Susan I. Wolk, Ewald Horwath, Rise B. Goldstein, Priya Wickramaratne, Myrna M. Weissman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has been controversial since its inception. It remains unclear whether more stringent diagnostic criteria, such as in DSM-III-R, have improved the validity of GAD. Family studies suggest that GAD aggregates at least weakly in families of probands with GAD, and support the separation of panic disorder (PD) and GAD. Therefore, we can use a family study design to examine the validity of GAD. Independent familial transmission of GAD supports the validity of GAD. We report here the risk of GAD according to RDC, DSM-III, and DSM-III-R criteria in the first-degree relatives of probands from four diagnostic groups: panic disorder, panic disorder with major depression, early-onset major depression (MDD), and normal controls. We did not find an elevated risk of DSM-III or DSM-III-R GAD in the relatives of any of the ill proband groups compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill when controlling for proband comorbidity for GAD. In contrast, RDC GAD aggregates in the first-degree relatives of probands from both of the PD proband groups (with and without MDD) compared to relatives of the normal control group. The inclusion of cases of subsyndromal panic attacks that did not meet the strict RDC for panic disorder as meeting the less restrictive RDC for GAD may partially account for the familial aggregation of RDC panic disorder and RDC GAD. RDC GAD seems to identify one or more syndrome(s) that may be on the familial spectrum of panic disorder. This syndrome may represent a mild or early variant of panic disorder. We also found a trend for RDC and DSM-III GAD to aggregate in the first-degree relatives of the MDD proband group compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill controls. These data suggest that GAD demonstrates more independent familial transmission from PD and MDD when defined by DSM-III-R criteria than when defined by RDC or DSM-III, and thus support the validity of DSM-III-R GAD. Anxiety 2:71–79 (1996).</i> © <i>1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"71-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7154%281996%292%3A2%3C71%3A%3AAID-ANXI2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7154%281996%292%3A2%3C71%3A%3AAID-ANXI2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8