惊恐障碍患者认知加工偏差的点探针评估:复制和扩展的失败

Anxiety Pub Date : 1994-01-01 DOI:10.1002/anxi.3070010304
Gordon J. G. Asmundson Ph.D., Murray B. Stein
{"title":"惊恐障碍患者认知加工偏差的点探针评估:复制和扩展的失败","authors":"Gordon J. G. Asmundson Ph.D.,&nbsp;Murray B. Stein","doi":"10.1002/anxi.3070010304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A number of cognitive psychology paradigms have been used to demonstrate that panic disorder patients selectively process stimuli that are related to themes of physical threat and catastrophe. The present investigation was an attempt to replicate and extend initial findings obtained with the dot-probe paradigm, a visual attention paradigm which allows for the assessment of allocation of visual attention to stimuli of varied emotional valence via the measurement of detection latencies for visual probes that follow their presentation. Twenty-two panic disorder patients and 20 healthy control subjects were tested using neutral, social threat, and panic symptom/fear cues. No between-group differences were observed in detection latencies for visual probes that followed neutral, social threat, or panic symptom/fear cues. These results represent a failure to replicate previous reports of selective processing in panic disorder and suggest that panic disorder patients may not selectively process cues related to bodily sensation and panic-related fears. Implications of this finding are discussed. Anxiety 1:123–128 (1994/1995). © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":79474,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety","volume":"1 3","pages":"123-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/anxi.3070010304","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dot-probe evaluation of cognitive processing biases in patients with panic disorder: A failure to replicate and extend\",\"authors\":\"Gordon J. G. Asmundson Ph.D.,&nbsp;Murray B. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anxi.3070010304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A number of cognitive psychology paradigms have been used to demonstrate that panic disorder patients selectively process stimuli that are related to themes of physical threat and catastrophe. The present investigation was an attempt to replicate and extend initial findings obtained with the dot-probe paradigm, a visual attention paradigm which allows for the assessment of allocation of visual attention to stimuli of varied emotional valence via the measurement of detection latencies for visual probes that follow their presentation. Twenty-two panic disorder patients and 20 healthy control subjects were tested using neutral, social threat, and panic symptom/fear cues. No between-group differences were observed in detection latencies for visual probes that followed neutral, social threat, or panic symptom/fear cues. These results represent a failure to replicate previous reports of selective processing in panic disorder and suggest that panic disorder patients may not selectively process cues related to bodily sensation and panic-related fears. Implications of this finding are discussed. Anxiety 1:123–128 (1994/1995). © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"123-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/anxi.3070010304\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anxi.3070010304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anxi.3070010304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

许多认知心理学范式已经被用来证明恐慌症患者选择性地处理与身体威胁和灾难主题相关的刺激。本研究试图复制和扩展点探针范式的初步发现,点探针范式是一种视觉注意范式,它允许通过测量视觉探针呈现后的检测潜伏期来评估视觉注意对不同情绪效价刺激的分配。使用中性、社会威胁和惊恐症状/恐惧线索对22名惊恐障碍患者和20名健康对照者进行了测试。在中性、社会威胁或恐慌症状/恐惧线索的视觉探针的检测潜伏期方面,组间没有观察到差异。这些结果未能重复先前关于惊恐障碍选择性处理的报道,并表明惊恐障碍患者可能没有选择性地处理与身体感觉和惊恐相关的恐惧相关的线索。讨论了这一发现的含义。焦虑:123 - 128(1994/1995)。©1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dot-probe evaluation of cognitive processing biases in patients with panic disorder: A failure to replicate and extend

A number of cognitive psychology paradigms have been used to demonstrate that panic disorder patients selectively process stimuli that are related to themes of physical threat and catastrophe. The present investigation was an attempt to replicate and extend initial findings obtained with the dot-probe paradigm, a visual attention paradigm which allows for the assessment of allocation of visual attention to stimuli of varied emotional valence via the measurement of detection latencies for visual probes that follow their presentation. Twenty-two panic disorder patients and 20 healthy control subjects were tested using neutral, social threat, and panic symptom/fear cues. No between-group differences were observed in detection latencies for visual probes that followed neutral, social threat, or panic symptom/fear cues. These results represent a failure to replicate previous reports of selective processing in panic disorder and suggest that panic disorder patients may not selectively process cues related to bodily sensation and panic-related fears. Implications of this finding are discussed. Anxiety 1:123–128 (1994/1995). © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信