在标准的治疗性供体授精失败后,成功使用超刺激水洗治疗性供体授精。

M P Dow, J M Jones, D A Dumesic, Y Lu, S S Shapiro
{"title":"在标准的治疗性供体授精失败后,成功使用超刺激水洗治疗性供体授精。","authors":"M P Dow,&nbsp;J M Jones,&nbsp;D A Dumesic,&nbsp;Y Lu,&nbsp;S S Shapiro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether an aggressive therapeutic donor insemination regimen (stimulated folliculogenesis and ovulation plus intrauterine insemination) can produce a better fecundability rate than a more traditional insemination regimen (non-stimulated folliculogenesis plus LH-timed intracervical insemination) in women who have failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six traditional insemination cycles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective comparison of fecundability rates was undertaken between women undergoing the traditional insemination protocol and those who voluntarily switched to ovarian hyperstimulation coupled with intrauterine insemination.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eight-two women who failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six intracervical insemination cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fecundability was 5.6% in cycles of continued urinary LH-timed intracervical insemination and 19.4% when the more aggressive regimen was applied. The difference in fecundability between protocols was significant (P < .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After an initial series of donor inseminations has failed, a more aggressive insemination regimen involving ovarian hyperstimulation followed by washed intrauterine insemination provides a higher fecundability rate than continued intracervical insemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":79342,"journal":{"name":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","volume":"41 6","pages":"516-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The successful use of hyperstimulated washed therapeutic donor insemination after standard therapeutic donor insemination has failed.\",\"authors\":\"M P Dow,&nbsp;J M Jones,&nbsp;D A Dumesic,&nbsp;Y Lu,&nbsp;S S Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether an aggressive therapeutic donor insemination regimen (stimulated folliculogenesis and ovulation plus intrauterine insemination) can produce a better fecundability rate than a more traditional insemination regimen (non-stimulated folliculogenesis plus LH-timed intracervical insemination) in women who have failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six traditional insemination cycles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective comparison of fecundability rates was undertaken between women undergoing the traditional insemination protocol and those who voluntarily switched to ovarian hyperstimulation coupled with intrauterine insemination.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eight-two women who failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six intracervical insemination cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fecundability was 5.6% in cycles of continued urinary LH-timed intracervical insemination and 19.4% when the more aggressive regimen was applied. The difference in fecundability between protocols was significant (P < .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After an initial series of donor inseminations has failed, a more aggressive insemination regimen involving ovarian hyperstimulation followed by washed intrauterine insemination provides a higher fecundability rate than continued intracervical insemination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"516-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨主动治疗性供体人工授精方案(刺激卵泡生成和排卵+宫内授精)是否比传统的人工授精方案(非刺激卵泡生成+ h -time宫颈内授精)在最初6个传统授精周期中未能怀孕的妇女产生更好的受精率。设计:回顾性比较接受传统人工授精方案的妇女和自愿转向卵巢过度刺激并宫内人工授精的妇女的受精率。参与者:在最初的六次宫颈内人工授精周期中未能怀孕的82名妇女。结果:持续尿h -定时宫颈内人工授精周期受精率为5.6%,强化方案受精率为19.4%。不同方案的受精率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.005)。结论:在最初的一系列供体人工授精失败后,更积极的人工授精方案包括卵巢过度刺激,然后清洗宫内授精,比继续宫颈内授精提供更高的受精率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The successful use of hyperstimulated washed therapeutic donor insemination after standard therapeutic donor insemination has failed.

Objective: To investigate whether an aggressive therapeutic donor insemination regimen (stimulated folliculogenesis and ovulation plus intrauterine insemination) can produce a better fecundability rate than a more traditional insemination regimen (non-stimulated folliculogenesis plus LH-timed intracervical insemination) in women who have failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six traditional insemination cycles.

Design: A retrospective comparison of fecundability rates was undertaken between women undergoing the traditional insemination protocol and those who voluntarily switched to ovarian hyperstimulation coupled with intrauterine insemination.

Participants: Eight-two women who failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six intracervical insemination cycles.

Results: Fecundability was 5.6% in cycles of continued urinary LH-timed intracervical insemination and 19.4% when the more aggressive regimen was applied. The difference in fecundability between protocols was significant (P < .005).

Conclusion: After an initial series of donor inseminations has failed, a more aggressive insemination regimen involving ovarian hyperstimulation followed by washed intrauterine insemination provides a higher fecundability rate than continued intracervical insemination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信