两种血清学方法诊断包虫病的比较

H M Arienti, S I Guignard, D E Rinaldi, O C Elbarcha
{"title":"两种血清学方法诊断包虫病的比较","authors":"H M Arienti,&nbsp;S I Guignard,&nbsp;D E Rinaldi,&nbsp;O C Elbarcha","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sera of 176 patients with epidemiologic antecedents or radiologic and clinical signs of hydatidosis were tested by counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIE) and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). A semipurified antigen from cysts of human origin were used for both techniques. The results were compared with those obtained from complementary radiologic studies and were confirmed by examination of excised cysts. Biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of hydatidosis in 65 patients (37%) and revealed the presence of other diseases in the remaining 111 (63%). Of the original 176 patients, 36 (20.4%) were positive by CIE and 62 (35.2%) by ELISA. Both techniques showed an excellent correlation with postsurgical diagnosis; neither produced any false positives, and the ELISA gave false negative results for only three patients (4.6%) with cysts that were infected, infertile, or calcified to some degree. The paper describes standardization of an inexpensive and easy-to-use microELISA.</p>","PeriodicalId":75611,"journal":{"name":"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau","volume":"121 3","pages":"221-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of 2 serologic methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis].\",\"authors\":\"H M Arienti,&nbsp;S I Guignard,&nbsp;D E Rinaldi,&nbsp;O C Elbarcha\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The sera of 176 patients with epidemiologic antecedents or radiologic and clinical signs of hydatidosis were tested by counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIE) and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). A semipurified antigen from cysts of human origin were used for both techniques. The results were compared with those obtained from complementary radiologic studies and were confirmed by examination of excised cysts. Biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of hydatidosis in 65 patients (37%) and revealed the presence of other diseases in the remaining 111 (63%). Of the original 176 patients, 36 (20.4%) were positive by CIE and 62 (35.2%) by ELISA. Both techniques showed an excellent correlation with postsurgical diagnosis; neither produced any false positives, and the ELISA gave false negative results for only three patients (4.6%) with cysts that were infected, infertile, or calcified to some degree. The paper describes standardization of an inexpensive and easy-to-use microELISA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau\",\"volume\":\"121 3\",\"pages\":\"221-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用反免疫电泳(CIE)和酶联免疫分析法(ELISA)对176例有流行病学前例或有包虫病放射学和临床症状的患者进行血清检测。这两种技术都使用了来自人源性囊肿的半纯化抗原。结果与补充放射学研究结果进行了比较,并通过切除囊肿的检查得到证实。65例(37%)患者活检确诊为包虫病,其余111例(63%)发现存在其他疾病。在176例患者中,CIE阳性36例(20.4%),ELISA阳性62例(35.2%)。两种技术都显示出与术后诊断的良好相关性;两者均未产生假阳性,只有3例(4.6%)囊肿感染、不育或某种程度钙化的患者ELISA结果为假阴性。本文描述了一种廉价且易于使用的微量酶联免疫吸附试验的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparison of 2 serologic methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis].

The sera of 176 patients with epidemiologic antecedents or radiologic and clinical signs of hydatidosis were tested by counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIE) and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). A semipurified antigen from cysts of human origin were used for both techniques. The results were compared with those obtained from complementary radiologic studies and were confirmed by examination of excised cysts. Biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of hydatidosis in 65 patients (37%) and revealed the presence of other diseases in the remaining 111 (63%). Of the original 176 patients, 36 (20.4%) were positive by CIE and 62 (35.2%) by ELISA. Both techniques showed an excellent correlation with postsurgical diagnosis; neither produced any false positives, and the ELISA gave false negative results for only three patients (4.6%) with cysts that were infected, infertile, or calcified to some degree. The paper describes standardization of an inexpensive and easy-to-use microELISA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信