连续和脉动流量下气体体积测量装置的校准。

J D Hart, R T Withers
{"title":"连续和脉动流量下气体体积测量装置的校准。","authors":"J D Hart,&nbsp;R T Withers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A gas circuit that was capable of passing continuous or pulsatile flows via a 350 L Collins chain-compensated gasometer was built and evaluated. Various turbine volume transducers and dry gas meters were tested with gas compositions and flows that mimicked: a) inspired pulsatile flow over the physiological range and, b) mixed expirate being withdrawn from a Douglas bag. We found the Collins gasometer to be very accurate throughout its elevation, but its mixing fan is not required and atmospheric air should be left to saturate and the added water vapour calculated. Dry gas meters can be accurate to within 1% when calibrated (60 to 150 L/min), but require at least 25 L to be passed through them. The Morgan Ventilometer is an extremely reproducible device (coefficient of variation 0-0.2%, n = 60), but an increase in calibration syringe rate will elevate the calibration factor and reduce the percentage accuracy (one unit increase in calibration factor reduces accuracy by 0.6 - 1.0%). The optimal calibration syringe rate appears to be 30 - 45 b/min. Entrainment through the attached respiratory tubing can also alter the validity of the Ventilometer's calibration procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":79393,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":"28 2","pages":"61-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The calibration of gas volume measuring devices at continuous and pulsatile flows.\",\"authors\":\"J D Hart,&nbsp;R T Withers\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A gas circuit that was capable of passing continuous or pulsatile flows via a 350 L Collins chain-compensated gasometer was built and evaluated. Various turbine volume transducers and dry gas meters were tested with gas compositions and flows that mimicked: a) inspired pulsatile flow over the physiological range and, b) mixed expirate being withdrawn from a Douglas bag. We found the Collins gasometer to be very accurate throughout its elevation, but its mixing fan is not required and atmospheric air should be left to saturate and the added water vapour calculated. Dry gas meters can be accurate to within 1% when calibrated (60 to 150 L/min), but require at least 25 L to be passed through them. The Morgan Ventilometer is an extremely reproducible device (coefficient of variation 0-0.2%, n = 60), but an increase in calibration syringe rate will elevate the calibration factor and reduce the percentage accuracy (one unit increase in calibration factor reduces accuracy by 0.6 - 1.0%). The optimal calibration syringe rate appears to be 30 - 45 b/min. Entrainment through the attached respiratory tubing can also alter the validity of the Ventilometer's calibration procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"61-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立并评估了一个能够通过350 L柯林斯链补偿气体计的连续或脉动流的气体回路。对各种涡轮体积传感器和干气表进行了气体成分和流量的测试,模拟了:a)生理范围内的激发脉冲流,b)从道格拉斯袋中取出混合呼气。我们发现柯林斯气体计在整个海拔高度都非常准确,但不需要它的混合风扇,应该让大气空气饱和,并计算增加的水蒸气。干气表在校准时可以精确到1%以内(60至150升/分钟),但需要至少25升通过它们。Morgan呼吸计是一种极具可重复性的设备(变异系数0-0.2%,n = 60),但校准注射器率的增加会提高校准因子并降低百分比准确性(校准因子每增加一个单位,准确性会降低0.6 - 1.0%)。最佳校准注射速率为30 - 45 b/min。通过附加的呼吸管夹带也会改变风量计校准程序的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The calibration of gas volume measuring devices at continuous and pulsatile flows.

A gas circuit that was capable of passing continuous or pulsatile flows via a 350 L Collins chain-compensated gasometer was built and evaluated. Various turbine volume transducers and dry gas meters were tested with gas compositions and flows that mimicked: a) inspired pulsatile flow over the physiological range and, b) mixed expirate being withdrawn from a Douglas bag. We found the Collins gasometer to be very accurate throughout its elevation, but its mixing fan is not required and atmospheric air should be left to saturate and the added water vapour calculated. Dry gas meters can be accurate to within 1% when calibrated (60 to 150 L/min), but require at least 25 L to be passed through them. The Morgan Ventilometer is an extremely reproducible device (coefficient of variation 0-0.2%, n = 60), but an increase in calibration syringe rate will elevate the calibration factor and reduce the percentage accuracy (one unit increase in calibration factor reduces accuracy by 0.6 - 1.0%). The optimal calibration syringe rate appears to be 30 - 45 b/min. Entrainment through the attached respiratory tubing can also alter the validity of the Ventilometer's calibration procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信