硅油去除术后视网膜再脱离的处理。

German journal of ophthalmology Pub Date : 1996-03-01
S Bodanowitz, L Hesse, S Poller, P Kroll
{"title":"硅油去除术后视网膜再脱离的处理。","authors":"S Bodanowitz,&nbsp;L Hesse,&nbsp;S Poller,&nbsp;P Kroll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present investigation was to study the clinical course of eyes presenting with retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal (SOR), with special regard being paid to the long-term visual outcome. Between October 1989 and September 1994, SOR was performed on a consecutive series of 262 eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy combined with silicone-oil injection for complex retinal detachments. The records of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up period after redetachment following SOR was 26.3 (range 6-45) months. Redetachment occurred in 35 eyes (13.4%), mostly within 1-3 months of SOR. Redetachment was not dependent on the surgical procedure or the underlying disease. A total of 24 eyes were revitrectomized and a stable flat retina was the result in 23 eyes (65.7%). At the latest follow-up visit, 18 eyes (51.4%) had a visual acuity (VA) of > or = 0.02 and 14 eyes (40%) had a VA of > or = 0.1. In 12 eyes (34.3%) the final VA equalled the best VA recorded before redetachment; an increase in VA occurred in 6 eyes (17.1%) and a deterioration was noted in 17 eyes (48.6%). Only 6 of the 17 eyes that deteriorated had displayed a VA of > or = 0.02 prior to SOR and lost formed vision due to redetachment; these 6 eyes represent 17.1% of the eyes presenting with redetachment after SOR and 2.3% of all 262 eyes that had undergone SOR. These observations demonstrate that revitrectomy is an effective treatment for retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal. The final failure rate does not appear high enough to justify a contraindication for routine removal of silicone oil, especially since it remains a matter of speculation as to whether these eyes would have fared better had removal of silicone oil been avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":77146,"journal":{"name":"German journal of ophthalmology","volume":"5 2","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of retinal redetachment following silicone-oil removal.\",\"authors\":\"S Bodanowitz,&nbsp;L Hesse,&nbsp;S Poller,&nbsp;P Kroll\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the present investigation was to study the clinical course of eyes presenting with retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal (SOR), with special regard being paid to the long-term visual outcome. Between October 1989 and September 1994, SOR was performed on a consecutive series of 262 eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy combined with silicone-oil injection for complex retinal detachments. The records of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up period after redetachment following SOR was 26.3 (range 6-45) months. Redetachment occurred in 35 eyes (13.4%), mostly within 1-3 months of SOR. Redetachment was not dependent on the surgical procedure or the underlying disease. A total of 24 eyes were revitrectomized and a stable flat retina was the result in 23 eyes (65.7%). At the latest follow-up visit, 18 eyes (51.4%) had a visual acuity (VA) of > or = 0.02 and 14 eyes (40%) had a VA of > or = 0.1. In 12 eyes (34.3%) the final VA equalled the best VA recorded before redetachment; an increase in VA occurred in 6 eyes (17.1%) and a deterioration was noted in 17 eyes (48.6%). Only 6 of the 17 eyes that deteriorated had displayed a VA of > or = 0.02 prior to SOR and lost formed vision due to redetachment; these 6 eyes represent 17.1% of the eyes presenting with redetachment after SOR and 2.3% of all 262 eyes that had undergone SOR. These observations demonstrate that revitrectomy is an effective treatment for retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal. The final failure rate does not appear high enough to justify a contraindication for routine removal of silicone oil, especially since it remains a matter of speculation as to whether these eyes would have fared better had removal of silicone oil been avoided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究硅油去除(SOR)后视网膜再脱离的临床过程,并特别关注长期视力结果。在1989年10月至1994年9月间,我们对262只先前接受过玻璃体切除联合硅油注射治疗复杂视网膜脱离的眼睛进行了连续的手术。回顾性分析这些患者的记录。SOR术后再脱离的平均随访时间为26.3个月(范围6-45个月)。35只眼(13.4%)发生再脱离,多数发生在SOR术后1-3个月内。再脱离不依赖于手术程序或基础疾病。共切除24只眼,23只眼(65.7%)视网膜平整稳定。最近一次随访时,18只眼(51.4%)的视力>或= 0.02,14只眼(40%)的视力>或= 0.1。有12只眼(34.3%)的最终眼内视压等于再脱离前记录的最佳眼内视压;6只眼(17.1%)的VA增加,17只眼(48.6%)的VA恶化。17只恶化的眼睛中只有6只在SOR前显示VA >或= 0.02,并因再脱离而失去形成的视力;这6只眼占手术后再脱离的17.1%,占262只手术后再脱离的2.3%。这些观察结果表明,玻璃体切除术是治疗硅油去除后视网膜再脱离的有效方法。最终的失败率似乎并没有高到足以证明常规去除硅油的禁忌症,特别是因为它仍然是一个猜测的问题,这些眼睛是否会更好,如果避免去除硅油。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of retinal redetachment following silicone-oil removal.

The aim of the present investigation was to study the clinical course of eyes presenting with retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal (SOR), with special regard being paid to the long-term visual outcome. Between October 1989 and September 1994, SOR was performed on a consecutive series of 262 eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy combined with silicone-oil injection for complex retinal detachments. The records of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up period after redetachment following SOR was 26.3 (range 6-45) months. Redetachment occurred in 35 eyes (13.4%), mostly within 1-3 months of SOR. Redetachment was not dependent on the surgical procedure or the underlying disease. A total of 24 eyes were revitrectomized and a stable flat retina was the result in 23 eyes (65.7%). At the latest follow-up visit, 18 eyes (51.4%) had a visual acuity (VA) of > or = 0.02 and 14 eyes (40%) had a VA of > or = 0.1. In 12 eyes (34.3%) the final VA equalled the best VA recorded before redetachment; an increase in VA occurred in 6 eyes (17.1%) and a deterioration was noted in 17 eyes (48.6%). Only 6 of the 17 eyes that deteriorated had displayed a VA of > or = 0.02 prior to SOR and lost formed vision due to redetachment; these 6 eyes represent 17.1% of the eyes presenting with redetachment after SOR and 2.3% of all 262 eyes that had undergone SOR. These observations demonstrate that revitrectomy is an effective treatment for retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal. The final failure rate does not appear high enough to justify a contraindication for routine removal of silicone oil, especially since it remains a matter of speculation as to whether these eyes would have fared better had removal of silicone oil been avoided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信