{"title":"硅油去除术后视网膜再脱离的处理。","authors":"S Bodanowitz, L Hesse, S Poller, P Kroll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present investigation was to study the clinical course of eyes presenting with retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal (SOR), with special regard being paid to the long-term visual outcome. Between October 1989 and September 1994, SOR was performed on a consecutive series of 262 eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy combined with silicone-oil injection for complex retinal detachments. The records of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up period after redetachment following SOR was 26.3 (range 6-45) months. Redetachment occurred in 35 eyes (13.4%), mostly within 1-3 months of SOR. Redetachment was not dependent on the surgical procedure or the underlying disease. A total of 24 eyes were revitrectomized and a stable flat retina was the result in 23 eyes (65.7%). At the latest follow-up visit, 18 eyes (51.4%) had a visual acuity (VA) of > or = 0.02 and 14 eyes (40%) had a VA of > or = 0.1. In 12 eyes (34.3%) the final VA equalled the best VA recorded before redetachment; an increase in VA occurred in 6 eyes (17.1%) and a deterioration was noted in 17 eyes (48.6%). Only 6 of the 17 eyes that deteriorated had displayed a VA of > or = 0.02 prior to SOR and lost formed vision due to redetachment; these 6 eyes represent 17.1% of the eyes presenting with redetachment after SOR and 2.3% of all 262 eyes that had undergone SOR. These observations demonstrate that revitrectomy is an effective treatment for retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal. The final failure rate does not appear high enough to justify a contraindication for routine removal of silicone oil, especially since it remains a matter of speculation as to whether these eyes would have fared better had removal of silicone oil been avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":77146,"journal":{"name":"German journal of ophthalmology","volume":"5 2","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of retinal redetachment following silicone-oil removal.\",\"authors\":\"S Bodanowitz, L Hesse, S Poller, P Kroll\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the present investigation was to study the clinical course of eyes presenting with retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal (SOR), with special regard being paid to the long-term visual outcome. Between October 1989 and September 1994, SOR was performed on a consecutive series of 262 eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy combined with silicone-oil injection for complex retinal detachments. The records of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up period after redetachment following SOR was 26.3 (range 6-45) months. Redetachment occurred in 35 eyes (13.4%), mostly within 1-3 months of SOR. Redetachment was not dependent on the surgical procedure or the underlying disease. A total of 24 eyes were revitrectomized and a stable flat retina was the result in 23 eyes (65.7%). At the latest follow-up visit, 18 eyes (51.4%) had a visual acuity (VA) of > or = 0.02 and 14 eyes (40%) had a VA of > or = 0.1. In 12 eyes (34.3%) the final VA equalled the best VA recorded before redetachment; an increase in VA occurred in 6 eyes (17.1%) and a deterioration was noted in 17 eyes (48.6%). Only 6 of the 17 eyes that deteriorated had displayed a VA of > or = 0.02 prior to SOR and lost formed vision due to redetachment; these 6 eyes represent 17.1% of the eyes presenting with redetachment after SOR and 2.3% of all 262 eyes that had undergone SOR. These observations demonstrate that revitrectomy is an effective treatment for retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal. The final failure rate does not appear high enough to justify a contraindication for routine removal of silicone oil, especially since it remains a matter of speculation as to whether these eyes would have fared better had removal of silicone oil been avoided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of retinal redetachment following silicone-oil removal.
The aim of the present investigation was to study the clinical course of eyes presenting with retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal (SOR), with special regard being paid to the long-term visual outcome. Between October 1989 and September 1994, SOR was performed on a consecutive series of 262 eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy combined with silicone-oil injection for complex retinal detachments. The records of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up period after redetachment following SOR was 26.3 (range 6-45) months. Redetachment occurred in 35 eyes (13.4%), mostly within 1-3 months of SOR. Redetachment was not dependent on the surgical procedure or the underlying disease. A total of 24 eyes were revitrectomized and a stable flat retina was the result in 23 eyes (65.7%). At the latest follow-up visit, 18 eyes (51.4%) had a visual acuity (VA) of > or = 0.02 and 14 eyes (40%) had a VA of > or = 0.1. In 12 eyes (34.3%) the final VA equalled the best VA recorded before redetachment; an increase in VA occurred in 6 eyes (17.1%) and a deterioration was noted in 17 eyes (48.6%). Only 6 of the 17 eyes that deteriorated had displayed a VA of > or = 0.02 prior to SOR and lost formed vision due to redetachment; these 6 eyes represent 17.1% of the eyes presenting with redetachment after SOR and 2.3% of all 262 eyes that had undergone SOR. These observations demonstrate that revitrectomy is an effective treatment for retinal redetachment after silicone-oil removal. The final failure rate does not appear high enough to justify a contraindication for routine removal of silicone oil, especially since it remains a matter of speculation as to whether these eyes would have fared better had removal of silicone oil been avoided.