{"title":"假牙弹性衬里材料。","authors":"C J Thomas, T Mori","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern resilient liners may be broadly classed as plasticized resins, silicone rubbers and fluoropolymers. Desirable properties would be pronounced softness and resiliency, or visco elasticity. Compression tests of Molloplast B (a silicone rubber), Kurepeet (a fluoropolymer), Visco-gel (a tissue conditioner) and Xantopren ( a silicon impression material) (as control) showed a displacement of 4% and recovery to 0.4% permanent deformation after 15s of loading for Molloplast and Xantopren, and up to 32% and 13% displacement respectively for Visco-gel and Kurepeet followed by considerable permanent deformation. Recovery of the latter showed a typical curve for visco-elasticity. The small amount of initial deformation of the elastic materials on the other hand indicated unyielding and consequently unsatisfactory properties. The deformation of Kurepeet was not as great as Visco-gel but the fact that it was visco-elastic meant that it was likely to be a suitable long-term lining material. It therefore complied with requirements that a resilient denture liner should be soft and visco-elastic.</p>","PeriodicalId":77024,"journal":{"name":"Australian prosthodontic journal","volume":"7 ","pages":"45-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilient lining materials for dentures.\",\"authors\":\"C J Thomas, T Mori\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Modern resilient liners may be broadly classed as plasticized resins, silicone rubbers and fluoropolymers. Desirable properties would be pronounced softness and resiliency, or visco elasticity. Compression tests of Molloplast B (a silicone rubber), Kurepeet (a fluoropolymer), Visco-gel (a tissue conditioner) and Xantopren ( a silicon impression material) (as control) showed a displacement of 4% and recovery to 0.4% permanent deformation after 15s of loading for Molloplast and Xantopren, and up to 32% and 13% displacement respectively for Visco-gel and Kurepeet followed by considerable permanent deformation. Recovery of the latter showed a typical curve for visco-elasticity. The small amount of initial deformation of the elastic materials on the other hand indicated unyielding and consequently unsatisfactory properties. The deformation of Kurepeet was not as great as Visco-gel but the fact that it was visco-elastic meant that it was likely to be a suitable long-term lining material. It therefore complied with requirements that a resilient denture liner should be soft and visco-elastic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian prosthodontic journal\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"45-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian prosthodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian prosthodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modern resilient liners may be broadly classed as plasticized resins, silicone rubbers and fluoropolymers. Desirable properties would be pronounced softness and resiliency, or visco elasticity. Compression tests of Molloplast B (a silicone rubber), Kurepeet (a fluoropolymer), Visco-gel (a tissue conditioner) and Xantopren ( a silicon impression material) (as control) showed a displacement of 4% and recovery to 0.4% permanent deformation after 15s of loading for Molloplast and Xantopren, and up to 32% and 13% displacement respectively for Visco-gel and Kurepeet followed by considerable permanent deformation. Recovery of the latter showed a typical curve for visco-elasticity. The small amount of initial deformation of the elastic materials on the other hand indicated unyielding and consequently unsatisfactory properties. The deformation of Kurepeet was not as great as Visco-gel but the fact that it was visco-elastic meant that it was likely to be a suitable long-term lining material. It therefore complied with requirements that a resilient denture liner should be soft and visco-elastic.