{"title":"[抑郁症概念的未来]。","authors":"P Pichot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The history of the concept of depression is briefly reviewed. First described under the name of melancholia as a delusional state, then, since Esquirol, as a primary mood disorder, it was subdivided by Kraepelin in diseases characterised by an hypothetical etiology and is considered, since 1980, as a syndrome with many sub-varieties. The nature of the three possible models is discussed. The first two, until now used, which considered depression either as a disease or as a syndrome, are categorical. The first has been provisorily abandoned, due to the insufficiency of scientific proofs about the etio-pathogeny; the second, despite its growing complexity, is obviously not satisfactory. The third model, dimensional, which attracts a growing attention in other field of psychiatric nosology, offers for the time being a possible alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":75415,"journal":{"name":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","volume":"96 2","pages":"59-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The future of the concept of depression].\",\"authors\":\"P Pichot\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The history of the concept of depression is briefly reviewed. First described under the name of melancholia as a delusional state, then, since Esquirol, as a primary mood disorder, it was subdivided by Kraepelin in diseases characterised by an hypothetical etiology and is considered, since 1980, as a syndrome with many sub-varieties. The nature of the three possible models is discussed. The first two, until now used, which considered depression either as a disease or as a syndrome, are categorical. The first has been provisorily abandoned, due to the insufficiency of scientific proofs about the etio-pathogeny; the second, despite its growing complexity, is obviously not satisfactory. The third model, dimensional, which attracts a growing attention in other field of psychiatric nosology, offers for the time being a possible alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta psychiatrica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"96 2\",\"pages\":\"59-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta psychiatrica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The history of the concept of depression is briefly reviewed. First described under the name of melancholia as a delusional state, then, since Esquirol, as a primary mood disorder, it was subdivided by Kraepelin in diseases characterised by an hypothetical etiology and is considered, since 1980, as a syndrome with many sub-varieties. The nature of the three possible models is discussed. The first two, until now used, which considered depression either as a disease or as a syndrome, are categorical. The first has been provisorily abandoned, due to the insufficiency of scientific proofs about the etio-pathogeny; the second, despite its growing complexity, is obviously not satisfactory. The third model, dimensional, which attracts a growing attention in other field of psychiatric nosology, offers for the time being a possible alternative.