两种根管封闭技术对根管封闭能力的比较研究

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of endodontics Pub Date : 1995-09-01 DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81526-8

Antonio Pallarés DMD , Vicente Faus DMD

{"title":"两种根管封闭技术对根管封闭能力的比较研究","authors":"Antonio Pallarés DMD , Vicente Faus DMD","doi":"10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81526-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comparison was made of the ability of two root canal obturating techniques to prevent dye microleakage: gutta-percha lateral condensation and mechanically plasticized gutta-percha (JS Quickfill). Twenty central incisors were prepared and obturated by each technique. After rendering the teeth transparent, linear dye penetration was found to be 0.48 and 0.52 mm, respectively. The difference between the two techniques was not significant. As for the distribution of the sealing cement (AH26) in the teeth obturated with JS Quickfill, the cement was located in the most peripheral zone of the obturation alongside the dentinal walls, whereas the gutta-percha was found in the central part of the canal obturating material.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":"21 9","pages":"Pages 449-450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81526-8","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of the sealing ability of two root canal obturation techniques\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Pallarés DMD , Vicente Faus DMD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81526-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A comparison was made of the ability of two root canal obturating techniques to prevent dye microleakage: gutta-percha lateral condensation and mechanically plasticized gutta-percha (JS Quickfill). Twenty central incisors were prepared and obturated by each technique. After rendering the teeth transparent, linear dye penetration was found to be 0.48 and 0.52 mm, respectively. The difference between the two techniques was not significant. As for the distribution of the sealing cement (AH26) in the teeth obturated with JS Quickfill, the cement was located in the most peripheral zone of the obturation alongside the dentinal walls, whereas the gutta-percha was found in the central part of the canal obturating material.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\"21 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 449-450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81526-8\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239906815268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239906815268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

摘要

比较了两种根管封闭技术防止染料微泄漏的能力:杜仲胶横向凝结和机械塑化杜仲胶(JS Quickfill)。准备20个中切牙并采用每种方法进行封闭。使牙齿透明后，染料线性渗透分别为0.48 mm和0.52 mm。两种方法之间的差异不显著。在jsquick填料充填的牙体中，密封胶粘剂(AH26)的分布情况显示，胶粘剂沿牙本质壁分布在封闭牙体的最外围区域，而杜仲胶则分布在根管封闭材料的中心部位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A comparative study of the sealing ability of two root canal obturation techniques

A comparison was made of the ability of two root canal obturating techniques to prevent dye microleakage: gutta-percha lateral condensation and mechanically plasticized gutta-percha (JS Quickfill). Twenty central incisors were prepared and obturated by each technique. After rendering the teeth transparent, linear dye penetration was found to be 0.48 and 0.52 mm, respectively. The difference between the two techniques was not significant. As for the distribution of the sealing cement (AH26) in the teeth obturated with JS Quickfill, the cement was located in the most peripheral zone of the obturation alongside the dentinal walls, whereas the gutta-percha was found in the central part of the canal obturating material.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

8.80

自引率

9.50%

发文量

224

审稿时长

42 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.