过程工程如何(或为什么应该)帮助筛选和发现用于CO2捕获的固体吸附剂?

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arvind Rajendran*, Sai Gokul Subraveti, Kasturi Nagesh Pai, Vinay Prasad and Zukui Li, 
{"title":"过程工程如何(或为什么应该)帮助筛选和发现用于CO2捕获的固体吸附剂?","authors":"Arvind Rajendran*,&nbsp;Sai Gokul Subraveti,&nbsp;Kasturi Nagesh Pai,&nbsp;Vinay Prasad and Zukui Li,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Adsorption using solid sorbents is emerging as a serious contender to amine-based liquid absorption for postcombustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture. In the last 20+ years, significant efforts have been invested in developing adsorption processes for CO<sub>2</sub> capture. In particular, significant efforts have been invested in developing new adsorbents for this application. These efforts have led to the generation of hundreds of thousands of (hypothetical and real) adsorbents, e.g., zeolites and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Identifying the right adsorbent for CO<sub>2</sub> capture remains a challenging task. Most studies are focused on identifying adsorbents based on certain adsorption metrics. Recent studies have demonstrated that the performance of an adsorbent is intimately linked to the process in which it is deployed. Any meaningful screening should thus consider the complexity of the process. However, simulation and optimization of adsorption processes are computationally intensive, as they constitute the simultaneous propagation of heat and mass transfer fronts; the process is cyclic, and there are no straightforward design tools, thereby making large-scale process-informed screening of sorbents prohibitive.</p><p >This Account discusses four papers that develop computational methods to incorporate process-based evaluation for both bottom-up (chemistry to engineering) screening problems and top-down (engineering to chemistry) inverse problems. We discuss the development of the machine-assisted adsorption process learning and emulation (MAPLE) framework, a surrogate model based on deep artificial neural networks (ANNs) that can predict process-level performance by considering both process and material inputs. The framework, which has been experimentally validated, allows for reliable, process-informed screening of large adsorbent databases. We then discuss how process engineering tools can be used beyond adsorbent screening, i.e., to estimate the practically achievable performance and cost limits of pressure vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) processes should the ideal bespoke adsorbent be made. These studies show what conditions stand-alone PVSA processes are attractive and when they should not be considered. Finally, recent developments in physics-informed neural networks (PINNS) enable the rapid solution of complex partial differential equations, providing tools to potentially identify optimal cycle configurations. Ultimately, we provide areas where further developments are required and emphasize the need for strong collaborations between chemists and chemical engineers to move rapidly from discovery to field trials, as we do not have much time to fulfill commitments to net-zero targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"56 17","pages":"2354–2365"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can (or Why Should) Process Engineering Aid the Screening and Discovery of Solid Sorbents for CO2 Capture?\",\"authors\":\"Arvind Rajendran*,&nbsp;Sai Gokul Subraveti,&nbsp;Kasturi Nagesh Pai,&nbsp;Vinay Prasad and Zukui Li,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Adsorption using solid sorbents is emerging as a serious contender to amine-based liquid absorption for postcombustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture. In the last 20+ years, significant efforts have been invested in developing adsorption processes for CO<sub>2</sub> capture. In particular, significant efforts have been invested in developing new adsorbents for this application. These efforts have led to the generation of hundreds of thousands of (hypothetical and real) adsorbents, e.g., zeolites and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Identifying the right adsorbent for CO<sub>2</sub> capture remains a challenging task. Most studies are focused on identifying adsorbents based on certain adsorption metrics. Recent studies have demonstrated that the performance of an adsorbent is intimately linked to the process in which it is deployed. Any meaningful screening should thus consider the complexity of the process. However, simulation and optimization of adsorption processes are computationally intensive, as they constitute the simultaneous propagation of heat and mass transfer fronts; the process is cyclic, and there are no straightforward design tools, thereby making large-scale process-informed screening of sorbents prohibitive.</p><p >This Account discusses four papers that develop computational methods to incorporate process-based evaluation for both bottom-up (chemistry to engineering) screening problems and top-down (engineering to chemistry) inverse problems. We discuss the development of the machine-assisted adsorption process learning and emulation (MAPLE) framework, a surrogate model based on deep artificial neural networks (ANNs) that can predict process-level performance by considering both process and material inputs. The framework, which has been experimentally validated, allows for reliable, process-informed screening of large adsorbent databases. We then discuss how process engineering tools can be used beyond adsorbent screening, i.e., to estimate the practically achievable performance and cost limits of pressure vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) processes should the ideal bespoke adsorbent be made. These studies show what conditions stand-alone PVSA processes are attractive and when they should not be considered. Finally, recent developments in physics-informed neural networks (PINNS) enable the rapid solution of complex partial differential equations, providing tools to potentially identify optimal cycle configurations. Ultimately, we provide areas where further developments are required and emphasize the need for strong collaborations between chemists and chemical engineers to move rapidly from discovery to field trials, as we do not have much time to fulfill commitments to net-zero targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\"56 17\",\"pages\":\"2354–2365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00335\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00335","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

固体吸附剂的吸附正在成为胺基液体吸附法在燃烧后二氧化碳捕获中的有力竞争者。在过去的20多年里,人们在开发二氧化碳捕获的吸附工艺方面投入了大量的精力。特别是,在开发用于这一应用的新吸附剂方面已经投入了大量的努力。这些努力已经产生了数十万种(假设的和实际的)吸附剂,例如沸石和金属有机框架(MOFs)。确定二氧化碳捕获的正确吸附剂仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。大多数研究都集中在根据一定的吸附指标来确定吸附剂。最近的研究表明,吸附剂的性能与其部署过程密切相关。因此,任何有意义的筛选都应考虑到过程的复杂性。然而,吸附过程的模拟和优化是计算密集型的,因为它们构成了传热和传质前沿的同时传播;该过程是循环的,并且没有直接的设计工具,因此使得大规模的过程知情的吸附剂筛选是禁止的。本报告讨论了四篇论文,这些论文开发了计算方法,将基于过程的评估纳入自下而上(化学到工程)筛选问题和自上而下(工程到化学)反问题。我们讨论了机器辅助吸附过程学习和仿真(MAPLE)框架的发展,这是一个基于深度人工神经网络(ann)的代理模型,可以通过考虑过程和材料输入来预测过程级性能。该框架已经过实验验证,可以对大型吸附剂数据库进行可靠的、过程知情的筛选。然后,我们讨论了除了吸附剂筛选之外,如何使用工艺工程工具,即,如果制造出理想的定制吸附剂,就可以估计压力真空摆动吸附(PVSA)工艺的实际可实现性能和成本限制。这些研究表明,什么条件下独立的PVSA工艺是有吸引力的,什么时候不应该考虑。最后,物理信息神经网络(PINNS)的最新发展使复杂偏微分方程的快速求解成为可能,为潜在地识别最佳循环配置提供了工具。最后,我们提供了需要进一步发展的领域,并强调化学家和化学工程师之间需要强有力的合作,以迅速从发现到现场试验,因为我们没有太多时间来履行净零目标的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How Can (or Why Should) Process Engineering Aid the Screening and Discovery of Solid Sorbents for CO2 Capture?

How Can (or Why Should) Process Engineering Aid the Screening and Discovery of Solid Sorbents for CO2 Capture?

Adsorption using solid sorbents is emerging as a serious contender to amine-based liquid absorption for postcombustion CO2 capture. In the last 20+ years, significant efforts have been invested in developing adsorption processes for CO2 capture. In particular, significant efforts have been invested in developing new adsorbents for this application. These efforts have led to the generation of hundreds of thousands of (hypothetical and real) adsorbents, e.g., zeolites and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Identifying the right adsorbent for CO2 capture remains a challenging task. Most studies are focused on identifying adsorbents based on certain adsorption metrics. Recent studies have demonstrated that the performance of an adsorbent is intimately linked to the process in which it is deployed. Any meaningful screening should thus consider the complexity of the process. However, simulation and optimization of adsorption processes are computationally intensive, as they constitute the simultaneous propagation of heat and mass transfer fronts; the process is cyclic, and there are no straightforward design tools, thereby making large-scale process-informed screening of sorbents prohibitive.

This Account discusses four papers that develop computational methods to incorporate process-based evaluation for both bottom-up (chemistry to engineering) screening problems and top-down (engineering to chemistry) inverse problems. We discuss the development of the machine-assisted adsorption process learning and emulation (MAPLE) framework, a surrogate model based on deep artificial neural networks (ANNs) that can predict process-level performance by considering both process and material inputs. The framework, which has been experimentally validated, allows for reliable, process-informed screening of large adsorbent databases. We then discuss how process engineering tools can be used beyond adsorbent screening, i.e., to estimate the practically achievable performance and cost limits of pressure vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) processes should the ideal bespoke adsorbent be made. These studies show what conditions stand-alone PVSA processes are attractive and when they should not be considered. Finally, recent developments in physics-informed neural networks (PINNS) enable the rapid solution of complex partial differential equations, providing tools to potentially identify optimal cycle configurations. Ultimately, we provide areas where further developments are required and emphasize the need for strong collaborations between chemists and chemical engineers to move rapidly from discovery to field trials, as we do not have much time to fulfill commitments to net-zero targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信