U Hoppe, B Krüdewagen, H Stein, R Hertrampf, U Gundert-Remy
{"title":"荧光偏振免疫法(FPIA)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定人血浆中氟氯胺含量的比较。","authors":"U Hoppe, B Krüdewagen, H Stein, R Hertrampf, U Gundert-Remy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The precision and accuracy of HPLC and FPIA for the measurement of flecainide plasma levels were compared below, in and above the therapeutic range (200-1,000 ng/ml). Following a calibration crossover study, five standard plasma solutions of varying flecainide concentrations (SPS) and 99 flecainide containing plasma samples of 24 in-patients (IPS) were analyzed with both methods. The results show that within the range of approximately 500-1,500 ng/ml, the two methods did not differ in either precision (expressed as coefficient of variation, CV) or accuracy (expressed as relative error, RE). Close to the lower limit and below the therapeutic range however, HPLC provided greater precision and accuracy than FPIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13817,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","volume":"31 3","pages":"142-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for the measurement of flecainide in human plasma.\",\"authors\":\"U Hoppe, B Krüdewagen, H Stein, R Hertrampf, U Gundert-Remy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The precision and accuracy of HPLC and FPIA for the measurement of flecainide plasma levels were compared below, in and above the therapeutic range (200-1,000 ng/ml). Following a calibration crossover study, five standard plasma solutions of varying flecainide concentrations (SPS) and 99 flecainide containing plasma samples of 24 in-patients (IPS) were analyzed with both methods. The results show that within the range of approximately 500-1,500 ng/ml, the two methods did not differ in either precision (expressed as coefficient of variation, CV) or accuracy (expressed as relative error, RE). Close to the lower limit and below the therapeutic range however, HPLC provided greater precision and accuracy than FPIA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"142-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for the measurement of flecainide in human plasma.
The precision and accuracy of HPLC and FPIA for the measurement of flecainide plasma levels were compared below, in and above the therapeutic range (200-1,000 ng/ml). Following a calibration crossover study, five standard plasma solutions of varying flecainide concentrations (SPS) and 99 flecainide containing plasma samples of 24 in-patients (IPS) were analyzed with both methods. The results show that within the range of approximately 500-1,500 ng/ml, the two methods did not differ in either precision (expressed as coefficient of variation, CV) or accuracy (expressed as relative error, RE). Close to the lower limit and below the therapeutic range however, HPLC provided greater precision and accuracy than FPIA.