荧光偏振免疫法(FPIA)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定人血浆中氟氯胺含量的比较。

U Hoppe, B Krüdewagen, H Stein, R Hertrampf, U Gundert-Remy
{"title":"荧光偏振免疫法(FPIA)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定人血浆中氟氯胺含量的比较。","authors":"U Hoppe,&nbsp;B Krüdewagen,&nbsp;H Stein,&nbsp;R Hertrampf,&nbsp;U Gundert-Remy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The precision and accuracy of HPLC and FPIA for the measurement of flecainide plasma levels were compared below, in and above the therapeutic range (200-1,000 ng/ml). Following a calibration crossover study, five standard plasma solutions of varying flecainide concentrations (SPS) and 99 flecainide containing plasma samples of 24 in-patients (IPS) were analyzed with both methods. The results show that within the range of approximately 500-1,500 ng/ml, the two methods did not differ in either precision (expressed as coefficient of variation, CV) or accuracy (expressed as relative error, RE). Close to the lower limit and below the therapeutic range however, HPLC provided greater precision and accuracy than FPIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13817,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","volume":"31 3","pages":"142-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for the measurement of flecainide in human plasma.\",\"authors\":\"U Hoppe,&nbsp;B Krüdewagen,&nbsp;H Stein,&nbsp;R Hertrampf,&nbsp;U Gundert-Remy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The precision and accuracy of HPLC and FPIA for the measurement of flecainide plasma levels were compared below, in and above the therapeutic range (200-1,000 ng/ml). Following a calibration crossover study, five standard plasma solutions of varying flecainide concentrations (SPS) and 99 flecainide containing plasma samples of 24 in-patients (IPS) were analyzed with both methods. The results show that within the range of approximately 500-1,500 ng/ml, the two methods did not differ in either precision (expressed as coefficient of variation, CV) or accuracy (expressed as relative error, RE). Close to the lower limit and below the therapeutic range however, HPLC provided greater precision and accuracy than FPIA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"142-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了HPLC法和FPIA法在治疗范围(200- 1000 ng/ml)以下、以内和以上测定氟氯胺血药浓度的精密度和准确度。在校准交叉研究之后,用两种方法分析了24例住院患者(IPS)的5种不同浓度的标准血浆溶液(SPS)和99种含氟氯胺的血浆样品。结果表明,在约500-1,500 ng/ml范围内,两种方法的精密度(以变异系数CV表示)和准确度(以相对误差RE表示)均无差异。然而,在接近下限和低于治疗范围的情况下,HPLC比FPIA提供了更高的精密度和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for the measurement of flecainide in human plasma.

The precision and accuracy of HPLC and FPIA for the measurement of flecainide plasma levels were compared below, in and above the therapeutic range (200-1,000 ng/ml). Following a calibration crossover study, five standard plasma solutions of varying flecainide concentrations (SPS) and 99 flecainide containing plasma samples of 24 in-patients (IPS) were analyzed with both methods. The results show that within the range of approximately 500-1,500 ng/ml, the two methods did not differ in either precision (expressed as coefficient of variation, CV) or accuracy (expressed as relative error, RE). Close to the lower limit and below the therapeutic range however, HPLC provided greater precision and accuracy than FPIA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信