不确定条件下人-自然系统决策的知识协同生产

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Enayat A. Moallemi , Fateme Zare , Aniek Hebinck , Katrina Szetey , Edmundo Molina-Perez , Romy L. Zyngier , Michalis Hadjikakou , Jan Kwakkel , Marjolijn Haasnoot , Kelly K. Miller , David G. Groves , Peat Leith , Brett A. Bryan
{"title":"不确定条件下人-自然系统决策的知识协同生产","authors":"Enayat A. Moallemi ,&nbsp;Fateme Zare ,&nbsp;Aniek Hebinck ,&nbsp;Katrina Szetey ,&nbsp;Edmundo Molina-Perez ,&nbsp;Romy L. Zyngier ,&nbsp;Michalis Hadjikakou ,&nbsp;Jan Kwakkel ,&nbsp;Marjolijn Haasnoot ,&nbsp;Kelly K. Miller ,&nbsp;David G. Groves ,&nbsp;Peat Leith ,&nbsp;Brett A. Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decision-making under uncertainty is important for managing human-natural systems in a changing world. A major source of uncertainty is linked to the multi-actor settings of decisions with poorly understood values, complex relationships, and conflicting management approaches. Despite general agreement across disciplines on co-producing knowledge for viable and inclusive outcomes in a multi-actor context, there is still limited conceptual clarity and no systematic understanding on what co-production means in decision-making under uncertainty and how it can be approached. Here, we use content analysis and clustering to systematically analyse 50 decision-making cases with multiple time and spatial scales across 26 countries and in 9 different sectors in the last decade to serve two aims. The first is to synthesise the key recurring strategies that underpin high quality decision co-production across many cases of diverse features. The second is to identify important deficits and opportunities to leverage existing strategies towards flourishing co-production in support of decision-making. We find that four general strategies emerge centred around: promoting innovation for robust and equitable decisions; broadening the span of co-production across interacting systems; fostering social learning and inclusive participation; and improving pathways to impact. Additionally, five key areas that should be addressed to improve decision co-production are identified in relation to: participation diversity; collaborative action; power relationships; governance inclusivity; and transformative change. Characterising the emergent strategies and their key areas for improvement can help guide future works towards more pluralistic and integrated science and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":328,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102727"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Enayat A. Moallemi ,&nbsp;Fateme Zare ,&nbsp;Aniek Hebinck ,&nbsp;Katrina Szetey ,&nbsp;Edmundo Molina-Perez ,&nbsp;Romy L. Zyngier ,&nbsp;Michalis Hadjikakou ,&nbsp;Jan Kwakkel ,&nbsp;Marjolijn Haasnoot ,&nbsp;Kelly K. Miller ,&nbsp;David G. Groves ,&nbsp;Peat Leith ,&nbsp;Brett A. Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Decision-making under uncertainty is important for managing human-natural systems in a changing world. A major source of uncertainty is linked to the multi-actor settings of decisions with poorly understood values, complex relationships, and conflicting management approaches. Despite general agreement across disciplines on co-producing knowledge for viable and inclusive outcomes in a multi-actor context, there is still limited conceptual clarity and no systematic understanding on what co-production means in decision-making under uncertainty and how it can be approached. Here, we use content analysis and clustering to systematically analyse 50 decision-making cases with multiple time and spatial scales across 26 countries and in 9 different sectors in the last decade to serve two aims. The first is to synthesise the key recurring strategies that underpin high quality decision co-production across many cases of diverse features. The second is to identify important deficits and opportunities to leverage existing strategies towards flourishing co-production in support of decision-making. We find that four general strategies emerge centred around: promoting innovation for robust and equitable decisions; broadening the span of co-production across interacting systems; fostering social learning and inclusive participation; and improving pathways to impact. Additionally, five key areas that should be addressed to improve decision co-production are identified in relation to: participation diversity; collaborative action; power relationships; governance inclusivity; and transformative change. Characterising the emergent strategies and their key areas for improvement can help guide future works towards more pluralistic and integrated science and practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378023000936\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378023000936","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

不确定性下的决策对于在不断变化的世界中管理人-自然系统具有重要意义。不确定性的一个主要来源与决策的多参与者设置有关,这些设置具有难以理解的价值、复杂的关系和相互冲突的管理方法。尽管跨学科对在多行动者背景下可行和包容性结果的共同生产知识达成了普遍共识,但概念清晰度仍然有限,对于不确定性下决策中的共同生产意味着什么以及如何处理它仍然没有系统的理解。在这里,我们使用内容分析和聚类来系统地分析过去十年中26个国家和9个不同部门的50个具有多个时间和空间尺度的决策案例,以实现两个目标。第一个是综合关键的重复策略,这些策略支持在许多不同特征的情况下进行高质量的决策协同生产。第二是确定重要的不足和机会,利用现有战略促进合作生产,以支持决策。我们发现,出现了四种总体战略,其核心是:促进创新,以实现稳健和公平的决策;扩大相互作用系统之间的合作生产范围;促进社会学习和包容性参与;改善产生影响的途径。此外,还确定了为改善共同决策应解决的五个关键领域:参与多样性;协同行动;权力关系;治理包容性;还有变革性的改变。描述紧急战略及其需要改进的关键领域可以帮助指导未来的工作走向更加多元化和综合的科学与实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty

Decision-making under uncertainty is important for managing human-natural systems in a changing world. A major source of uncertainty is linked to the multi-actor settings of decisions with poorly understood values, complex relationships, and conflicting management approaches. Despite general agreement across disciplines on co-producing knowledge for viable and inclusive outcomes in a multi-actor context, there is still limited conceptual clarity and no systematic understanding on what co-production means in decision-making under uncertainty and how it can be approached. Here, we use content analysis and clustering to systematically analyse 50 decision-making cases with multiple time and spatial scales across 26 countries and in 9 different sectors in the last decade to serve two aims. The first is to synthesise the key recurring strategies that underpin high quality decision co-production across many cases of diverse features. The second is to identify important deficits and opportunities to leverage existing strategies towards flourishing co-production in support of decision-making. We find that four general strategies emerge centred around: promoting innovation for robust and equitable decisions; broadening the span of co-production across interacting systems; fostering social learning and inclusive participation; and improving pathways to impact. Additionally, five key areas that should be addressed to improve decision co-production are identified in relation to: participation diversity; collaborative action; power relationships; governance inclusivity; and transformative change. Characterising the emergent strategies and their key areas for improvement can help guide future works towards more pluralistic and integrated science and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Environmental Change
Global Environmental Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Change is a prestigious international journal that publishes articles of high quality, both theoretically and empirically rigorous. The journal aims to contribute to the understanding of global environmental change from the perspectives of human and policy dimensions. Specifically, it considers global environmental change as the result of processes occurring at the local level, but with wide-ranging impacts on various spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales. In terms of content, the journal seeks articles with a strong social science component. This includes research that examines the societal drivers and consequences of environmental change, as well as social and policy processes that aim to address these challenges. While the journal covers a broad range of topics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, climate, coasts, food systems, land use and land cover, oceans, urban areas, and water resources, it also welcomes contributions that investigate the drivers, consequences, and management of other areas affected by environmental change. Overall, Global Environmental Change encourages research that deepens our understanding of the complex interactions between human activities and the environment, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信