新生儿Apgar评分与脐动脉pH值的差异。(是否与分娩方式和胎儿结局有关?)

R Obwegeser, R Böhm, W Gruber
{"title":"新生儿Apgar评分与脐动脉pH值的差异。(是否与分娩方式和胎儿结局有关?)","authors":"R Obwegeser,&nbsp;R Böhm,&nbsp;W Gruber","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a retrospective study data from more than 9000 live births were analyzed. Our aim was to compare the significance of Apgar-Score and umbilical artery pH in predicting the condition and development of the newborn. We were particularly interested in three groups of patients: \"Group A\" included patients with a 5 minute Apgar-Score < or = 7 and a normal pH > 7,2. In \"Group P\" the pH was < 7,10 combined with a normal Apgar-Score (8 to 10). Both groups were compared with a \"normal group\" (pH > 7,20 and Apgar-Score between 8 and 10). There was a higher percentage of operative deliveries in group A (38%) and group P (20%) compared to the normal group (15%). The only predictor of a low Apgar-Score was meconium stained amniotic fluid (Group A 16%). A poor condition of the newborn correlated much better with a low Apgar-Score than with a low umbilical artery pH. In group A the rate of newborns transferred to the neonatology unit was 43% and the perinatal mortality rate was 50%. The poor correlation of a low umbilical artery pH and the fetal outcome is partly explainable by the standard cut off level of 7,20 for acidosis, which seems to be too high.</p>","PeriodicalId":23919,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","volume":"197 2","pages":"59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Discrepancy between Apgar score and umbilical artery pH value in the newborn infant. (Correlation to mode of delivery and fetal outcome?)].\",\"authors\":\"R Obwegeser,&nbsp;R Böhm,&nbsp;W Gruber\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a retrospective study data from more than 9000 live births were analyzed. Our aim was to compare the significance of Apgar-Score and umbilical artery pH in predicting the condition and development of the newborn. We were particularly interested in three groups of patients: \\\"Group A\\\" included patients with a 5 minute Apgar-Score < or = 7 and a normal pH > 7,2. In \\\"Group P\\\" the pH was < 7,10 combined with a normal Apgar-Score (8 to 10). Both groups were compared with a \\\"normal group\\\" (pH > 7,20 and Apgar-Score between 8 and 10). There was a higher percentage of operative deliveries in group A (38%) and group P (20%) compared to the normal group (15%). The only predictor of a low Apgar-Score was meconium stained amniotic fluid (Group A 16%). A poor condition of the newborn correlated much better with a low Apgar-Score than with a low umbilical artery pH. In group A the rate of newborns transferred to the neonatology unit was 43% and the perinatal mortality rate was 50%. The poor correlation of a low umbilical artery pH and the fetal outcome is partly explainable by the standard cut off level of 7,20 for acidosis, which seems to be too high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie\",\"volume\":\"197 2\",\"pages\":\"59-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,对9000多名活产婴儿的数据进行了分析。我们的目的是比较Apgar-Score和脐动脉pH值在预测新生儿状况和发育方面的意义。我们对三组患者特别感兴趣:“A组”包括5分钟apgar评分<或= 7和正常pH值> 7,2的患者。P组pH < 7,10, Apgar-Score正常(8 ~ 10)。两组均与“正常组”(pH > 7、20,Apgar-Score在8 ~ 10之间)进行比较。与正常组(15%)相比,a组(38%)和P组(20%)的手术分娩率更高。低apgar评分的唯一预测因子是胎粪染色羊水(a组16%)。新生儿的不良状况与低apgar评分的相关性要比与低脐动脉ph的相关性强得多。在A组中,新生儿转到新生儿病房的比率为43%,围产期死亡率为50%。低脐动脉pH值与胎儿结局的相关性较差,部分原因是酸中毒的标准临界值为7.20,这似乎太高了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Discrepancy between Apgar score and umbilical artery pH value in the newborn infant. (Correlation to mode of delivery and fetal outcome?)].

In a retrospective study data from more than 9000 live births were analyzed. Our aim was to compare the significance of Apgar-Score and umbilical artery pH in predicting the condition and development of the newborn. We were particularly interested in three groups of patients: "Group A" included patients with a 5 minute Apgar-Score < or = 7 and a normal pH > 7,2. In "Group P" the pH was < 7,10 combined with a normal Apgar-Score (8 to 10). Both groups were compared with a "normal group" (pH > 7,20 and Apgar-Score between 8 and 10). There was a higher percentage of operative deliveries in group A (38%) and group P (20%) compared to the normal group (15%). The only predictor of a low Apgar-Score was meconium stained amniotic fluid (Group A 16%). A poor condition of the newborn correlated much better with a low Apgar-Score than with a low umbilical artery pH. In group A the rate of newborns transferred to the neonatology unit was 43% and the perinatal mortality rate was 50%. The poor correlation of a low umbilical artery pH and the fetal outcome is partly explainable by the standard cut off level of 7,20 for acidosis, which seems to be too high.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信