{"title":"维拉帕米浓度/效果分析:不同方法的评价。","authors":"S Harder, S Rietbrock, P Thürmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasma concentration and PR-interval prolongation were correlated after a single dose of 80 mg verapamil (trial A) and at steady-state during one dose interval (80 mg verapamil t.i.d.) on day 7 (trial B) and day 14 (trial C) and the subsequent dose interval at the afternoon on day 14 (trial D). The pharmacokinetic parameters of verapamil indicated a two-fold increase in AUC and Cmax at trial B and C when compared with the single dose application, but AUC and Cmax were considerably lesser during the afternoon dosing interval (trial D). For each subject, concentration/effect analysis was established: according to a linear and a sigmoidal model, and using a plasma concentration vs effect approach (1) and a semiparametric effect-site concentration vs effect approach (2). The comparison of the two different approaches and models showed that in general, the concentration/effect analysis based on the linear model and with approach 2 gave the best description of the dromotropic response to verapamil for the majority of the individuals. However, approach 1 accounts for 30 to 50% of the concentration/effect curve established in the data subsets of trial A to D, and about 40% of all curves in trial A, B and C can be more precisely described with the Emax-model, whereas almost all curves obtained in trial D were best described by a linear model. A decrease in the responsiveness to verapamil at steady-state was indicated by both models, but more precisely described by the parameters of the Emax-model.</p>","PeriodicalId":13817,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","volume":"31 10","pages":"469-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concentration/effect analysis of verapamil: evaluation of different approaches.\",\"authors\":\"S Harder, S Rietbrock, P Thürmann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plasma concentration and PR-interval prolongation were correlated after a single dose of 80 mg verapamil (trial A) and at steady-state during one dose interval (80 mg verapamil t.i.d.) on day 7 (trial B) and day 14 (trial C) and the subsequent dose interval at the afternoon on day 14 (trial D). The pharmacokinetic parameters of verapamil indicated a two-fold increase in AUC and Cmax at trial B and C when compared with the single dose application, but AUC and Cmax were considerably lesser during the afternoon dosing interval (trial D). For each subject, concentration/effect analysis was established: according to a linear and a sigmoidal model, and using a plasma concentration vs effect approach (1) and a semiparametric effect-site concentration vs effect approach (2). The comparison of the two different approaches and models showed that in general, the concentration/effect analysis based on the linear model and with approach 2 gave the best description of the dromotropic response to verapamil for the majority of the individuals. However, approach 1 accounts for 30 to 50% of the concentration/effect curve established in the data subsets of trial A to D, and about 40% of all curves in trial A, B and C can be more precisely described with the Emax-model, whereas almost all curves obtained in trial D were best described by a linear model. A decrease in the responsiveness to verapamil at steady-state was indicated by both models, but more precisely described by the parameters of the Emax-model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"volume\":\"31 10\",\"pages\":\"469-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concentration/effect analysis of verapamil: evaluation of different approaches.
Plasma concentration and PR-interval prolongation were correlated after a single dose of 80 mg verapamil (trial A) and at steady-state during one dose interval (80 mg verapamil t.i.d.) on day 7 (trial B) and day 14 (trial C) and the subsequent dose interval at the afternoon on day 14 (trial D). The pharmacokinetic parameters of verapamil indicated a two-fold increase in AUC and Cmax at trial B and C when compared with the single dose application, but AUC and Cmax were considerably lesser during the afternoon dosing interval (trial D). For each subject, concentration/effect analysis was established: according to a linear and a sigmoidal model, and using a plasma concentration vs effect approach (1) and a semiparametric effect-site concentration vs effect approach (2). The comparison of the two different approaches and models showed that in general, the concentration/effect analysis based on the linear model and with approach 2 gave the best description of the dromotropic response to verapamil for the majority of the individuals. However, approach 1 accounts for 30 to 50% of the concentration/effect curve established in the data subsets of trial A to D, and about 40% of all curves in trial A, B and C can be more precisely described with the Emax-model, whereas almost all curves obtained in trial D were best described by a linear model. A decrease in the responsiveness to verapamil at steady-state was indicated by both models, but more precisely described by the parameters of the Emax-model.