A Delannoy, A Ferrant, P Martiat, L Montfort, C Doyen, G Sokal, J L Michaux
{"title":"2-氯脱氧腺苷治疗晚期慢性淋巴细胞白血病。","authors":"A Delannoy, A Ferrant, P Martiat, L Montfort, C Doyen, G Sokal, J L Michaux","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic potential of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (CdA) in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) remains controversial with response rates in clinical trials ranging from 44 to 67%. This report describes our experience with CdA in 22 CLL patients having already undergone previous treatment. CdA was given by continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 4 mg/m2/day for 7 days (4 patients) or as 2-h intravenous infusions at a dose of 5.6 mg/m2/day for 5 days (18 patients). Partial (n = 5) or complete (n = 2) response was obtained in 7 cases. As compared to unresponsive patients, responding subjects received CdA earlier in the course of their disease (mean interval between diagnosis and CdA therapy 58 vs 102 months), were less thrombocytopenic at initiation of CdA (mean platelet count 165 x 10(9)/L vs 81 x 10(9)/L) and experienced less severe neutropenia during the first course of therapy (mean minimal neutrophil count 1.55 x 10(9)/L vs 0.43 x 10(9)/L). None of 6 patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine responded to CdA. An evaluation of haematological toxicity during the first course of treatment showed grade 4 neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) in 7 cases and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (< 25 x 10(9)/L) in one of 19 cases where the platelet count was greater than 25 x 10(9)/L at initiation of CdA. In comparison with earlier reports, the present series of patients had received relatively heavy prior therapy, experienced more severe haematological toxicity and demonstrated a lower total response rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19366,"journal":{"name":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","volume":"36 4","pages":"311-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine therapy in advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.\",\"authors\":\"A Delannoy, A Ferrant, P Martiat, L Montfort, C Doyen, G Sokal, J L Michaux\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The therapeutic potential of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (CdA) in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) remains controversial with response rates in clinical trials ranging from 44 to 67%. This report describes our experience with CdA in 22 CLL patients having already undergone previous treatment. CdA was given by continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 4 mg/m2/day for 7 days (4 patients) or as 2-h intravenous infusions at a dose of 5.6 mg/m2/day for 5 days (18 patients). Partial (n = 5) or complete (n = 2) response was obtained in 7 cases. As compared to unresponsive patients, responding subjects received CdA earlier in the course of their disease (mean interval between diagnosis and CdA therapy 58 vs 102 months), were less thrombocytopenic at initiation of CdA (mean platelet count 165 x 10(9)/L vs 81 x 10(9)/L) and experienced less severe neutropenia during the first course of therapy (mean minimal neutrophil count 1.55 x 10(9)/L vs 0.43 x 10(9)/L). None of 6 patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine responded to CdA. An evaluation of haematological toxicity during the first course of treatment showed grade 4 neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) in 7 cases and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (< 25 x 10(9)/L) in one of 19 cases where the platelet count was greater than 25 x 10(9)/L at initiation of CdA. In comparison with earlier reports, the present series of patients had received relatively heavy prior therapy, experienced more severe haematological toxicity and demonstrated a lower total response rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"311-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2-氯脱氧腺苷(CdA)在晚期慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者中的治疗潜力仍然存在争议,临床试验的应答率从44%到67%不等。本报告描述了我们对22例已经接受过治疗的CLL患者进行CdA治疗的经验。CdA以4 mg/m2/天的剂量连续静脉输注7天(4例),或以5.6 mg/m2/天的剂量静脉输注2小时(18例),连续5天。部分缓解(n = 5)或完全缓解(n = 2) 7例。与无反应的患者相比,有反应的患者在病程早期接受了CdA(诊断和CdA治疗之间的平均间隔为58个月vs 102个月),在CdA开始时血小板减少较少(平均血小板计数165 × 10(9)/L vs 81 × 10(9)/L),并且在第一个疗程中出现较轻的中性粒细胞减少(平均最小中性粒细胞计数1.55 × 10(9)/L vs 0.43 × 10(9)/L)。6例对氟达拉滨难治性CLL患者均无CdA应答。第一个疗程的血液学毒性评估显示,在CdA开始时血小板计数大于25 x 10(9)/L的19例患者中,有1例出现4级中性粒细胞减少症(< 0.5 x 10(9)/L)和4级血小板减少症(< 25 x 10(9)/L)。与早期报道相比,本系列患者先前接受过相对较重的治疗,经历了更严重的血液学毒性,并表现出较低的总有效率。
2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine therapy in advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
The therapeutic potential of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (CdA) in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) remains controversial with response rates in clinical trials ranging from 44 to 67%. This report describes our experience with CdA in 22 CLL patients having already undergone previous treatment. CdA was given by continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 4 mg/m2/day for 7 days (4 patients) or as 2-h intravenous infusions at a dose of 5.6 mg/m2/day for 5 days (18 patients). Partial (n = 5) or complete (n = 2) response was obtained in 7 cases. As compared to unresponsive patients, responding subjects received CdA earlier in the course of their disease (mean interval between diagnosis and CdA therapy 58 vs 102 months), were less thrombocytopenic at initiation of CdA (mean platelet count 165 x 10(9)/L vs 81 x 10(9)/L) and experienced less severe neutropenia during the first course of therapy (mean minimal neutrophil count 1.55 x 10(9)/L vs 0.43 x 10(9)/L). None of 6 patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine responded to CdA. An evaluation of haematological toxicity during the first course of treatment showed grade 4 neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) in 7 cases and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (< 25 x 10(9)/L) in one of 19 cases where the platelet count was greater than 25 x 10(9)/L at initiation of CdA. In comparison with earlier reports, the present series of patients had received relatively heavy prior therapy, experienced more severe haematological toxicity and demonstrated a lower total response rate.