M Fournier, A Gireau, B Boniface, C Ghevaert, P Lepelley, M Zandecki, J Goudemand, A Cosson
{"title":"[雅培cd3500治疗严重白细胞减少症的疗效评价]。","authors":"M Fournier, A Gireau, B Boniface, C Ghevaert, P Lepelley, M Zandecki, J Goudemand, A Cosson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leucopenia patient follow-up remains, in terms of laboratory turnaround, a heavy workload due to the leucoconcentrations necessary for evaluating leucocytic formulas. We tested the CD 3500 with the objective of defining its' analytical performances and routine practice. 101 leucopenia samples (< 2.10(9)/l) procured from the onco-hematology department (adults and children) were studied during a 1 month period. The leucocytic formula obtained after leuconcentrations was our reference. The alarm sensitivity, as a whole, was of 97% for a 15.5% specificity. The correlation coefficients (Cell-Dyn/microscope) for polynuclears, lymphocytes and monocytes were respectively 0.889, 0.925 and 0.926. The correlation coefficients observed in both following subgroups: < or = 0.5.10(9)/l and > 0.5.10(9)/l were superposable. In 95% of the cases, the numeric value difference between the two methods attained a maximum of 21% for all neutrophils and lymphocytes and 13% for the monocytes. There was an excellent concordance between both methods for eosinophilia and basophils with confidence intervals of +/-8.8% and +/-2.2%. In practice, we feel that the use of a CD 3500 in post chemotherapy leucopenia, is perfectly adaptable and appreciated for leucocytic formulas, as well as a good exit for aplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19366,"journal":{"name":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","volume":"36 Suppl 2 ","pages":"S117-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of Abbott CD 3500 in severe leukopenia].\",\"authors\":\"M Fournier, A Gireau, B Boniface, C Ghevaert, P Lepelley, M Zandecki, J Goudemand, A Cosson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Leucopenia patient follow-up remains, in terms of laboratory turnaround, a heavy workload due to the leucoconcentrations necessary for evaluating leucocytic formulas. We tested the CD 3500 with the objective of defining its' analytical performances and routine practice. 101 leucopenia samples (< 2.10(9)/l) procured from the onco-hematology department (adults and children) were studied during a 1 month period. The leucocytic formula obtained after leuconcentrations was our reference. The alarm sensitivity, as a whole, was of 97% for a 15.5% specificity. The correlation coefficients (Cell-Dyn/microscope) for polynuclears, lymphocytes and monocytes were respectively 0.889, 0.925 and 0.926. The correlation coefficients observed in both following subgroups: < or = 0.5.10(9)/l and > 0.5.10(9)/l were superposable. In 95% of the cases, the numeric value difference between the two methods attained a maximum of 21% for all neutrophils and lymphocytes and 13% for the monocytes. There was an excellent concordance between both methods for eosinophilia and basophils with confidence intervals of +/-8.8% and +/-2.2%. In practice, we feel that the use of a CD 3500 in post chemotherapy leucopenia, is perfectly adaptable and appreciated for leucocytic formulas, as well as a good exit for aplasia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie\",\"volume\":\"36 Suppl 2 \",\"pages\":\"S117-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Evaluation of Abbott CD 3500 in severe leukopenia].
Leucopenia patient follow-up remains, in terms of laboratory turnaround, a heavy workload due to the leucoconcentrations necessary for evaluating leucocytic formulas. We tested the CD 3500 with the objective of defining its' analytical performances and routine practice. 101 leucopenia samples (< 2.10(9)/l) procured from the onco-hematology department (adults and children) were studied during a 1 month period. The leucocytic formula obtained after leuconcentrations was our reference. The alarm sensitivity, as a whole, was of 97% for a 15.5% specificity. The correlation coefficients (Cell-Dyn/microscope) for polynuclears, lymphocytes and monocytes were respectively 0.889, 0.925 and 0.926. The correlation coefficients observed in both following subgroups: < or = 0.5.10(9)/l and > 0.5.10(9)/l were superposable. In 95% of the cases, the numeric value difference between the two methods attained a maximum of 21% for all neutrophils and lymphocytes and 13% for the monocytes. There was an excellent concordance between both methods for eosinophilia and basophils with confidence intervals of +/-8.8% and +/-2.2%. In practice, we feel that the use of a CD 3500 in post chemotherapy leucopenia, is perfectly adaptable and appreciated for leucocytic formulas, as well as a good exit for aplasia.