多重化学敏感性综合征:临床视角。1 .病例定义、发病机理理论及研究需求。

P J Sparks, W Daniell, D W Black, H M Kipen, L C Altman, G E Simon, A I Terr
{"title":"多重化学敏感性综合征:临床视角。1 .病例定义、发病机理理论及研究需求。","authors":"P J Sparks,&nbsp;W Daniell,&nbsp;D W Black,&nbsp;H M Kipen,&nbsp;L C Altman,&nbsp;G E Simon,&nbsp;A I Terr","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS) does not appear to fit established principles of toxicology. Yet social, political, and economic forces are demanding that MCS be defined medically, even though to date scientific studies have not identified pathogenic mechanisms for the condition or any objective diagnostic criteria. Consequently, a working definition of MCS can rely only on an individual's subjective symptoms of distress and attribution to environmental exposures rather than currently measurable objective evidence of disease. Nevertheless, patients labeled with MCS are clearly distressed and many are functionally disabled. In this review, four theories of causation are explored: (1) MCS is a purely biologic/physical or psychophysiologic reaction to low-level chemical exposures. (2) MCS symptoms may be elicited by low-level environmental chemical exposures, but the sensitivity is initiated by psychologic stress. (3) MCS is a misdiagnosis and chemical exposure is not the cause. The symptoms may be due to misdiagnosed physical or psychologic illness. (4) MCS is an illness belief system manifest by culturally shaped illness behavior. Areas for further research regarding the etiologies of MCS are suggested. Recognizing that the cause of the syndrome may be multifactorial, strategies are proposed for clinical evaluation and management in Part II of this manuscript using a biopsychosocial model of illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association","volume":"36 7","pages":"718-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. I. Case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs.\",\"authors\":\"P J Sparks,&nbsp;W Daniell,&nbsp;D W Black,&nbsp;H M Kipen,&nbsp;L C Altman,&nbsp;G E Simon,&nbsp;A I Terr\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS) does not appear to fit established principles of toxicology. Yet social, political, and economic forces are demanding that MCS be defined medically, even though to date scientific studies have not identified pathogenic mechanisms for the condition or any objective diagnostic criteria. Consequently, a working definition of MCS can rely only on an individual's subjective symptoms of distress and attribution to environmental exposures rather than currently measurable objective evidence of disease. Nevertheless, patients labeled with MCS are clearly distressed and many are functionally disabled. In this review, four theories of causation are explored: (1) MCS is a purely biologic/physical or psychophysiologic reaction to low-level chemical exposures. (2) MCS symptoms may be elicited by low-level environmental chemical exposures, but the sensitivity is initiated by psychologic stress. (3) MCS is a misdiagnosis and chemical exposure is not the cause. The symptoms may be due to misdiagnosed physical or psychologic illness. (4) MCS is an illness belief system manifest by culturally shaped illness behavior. Areas for further research regarding the etiologies of MCS are suggested. Recognizing that the cause of the syndrome may be multifactorial, strategies are proposed for clinical evaluation and management in Part II of this manuscript using a biopsychosocial model of illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"36 7\",\"pages\":\"718-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多重化学敏感综合征(MCS)似乎不符合既定的毒理学原则。然而,社会、政治和经济力量要求从医学上定义MCS,尽管迄今为止的科学研究尚未确定该病的致病机制或任何客观诊断标准。因此,MCS的工作定义只能依赖于个体的主观痛苦症状和环境暴露的归因,而不是目前可测量的疾病的客观证据。然而,被标记为MCS的患者显然是痛苦的,许多是功能残疾的。本文探讨了四种原因理论:(1)MCS是对低水平化学物质暴露的纯粹生物/生理或心理生理反应。(2) MCS症状可能由低水平环境化学物质暴露引起,但其敏感性是由心理应激引起的。(3) MCS是误诊,化学物质暴露不是病因。这些症状可能是由于误诊的生理或心理疾病。(4) MCS是一种以文化塑造的疾病行为为表现形式的疾病信念系统。提出了MCS病因学有待进一步研究的领域。认识到该综合征的原因可能是多因素的,本文第二部分使用疾病的生物心理社会模型提出了临床评估和管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. I. Case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs.

Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome (MCS) does not appear to fit established principles of toxicology. Yet social, political, and economic forces are demanding that MCS be defined medically, even though to date scientific studies have not identified pathogenic mechanisms for the condition or any objective diagnostic criteria. Consequently, a working definition of MCS can rely only on an individual's subjective symptoms of distress and attribution to environmental exposures rather than currently measurable objective evidence of disease. Nevertheless, patients labeled with MCS are clearly distressed and many are functionally disabled. In this review, four theories of causation are explored: (1) MCS is a purely biologic/physical or psychophysiologic reaction to low-level chemical exposures. (2) MCS symptoms may be elicited by low-level environmental chemical exposures, but the sensitivity is initiated by psychologic stress. (3) MCS is a misdiagnosis and chemical exposure is not the cause. The symptoms may be due to misdiagnosed physical or psychologic illness. (4) MCS is an illness belief system manifest by culturally shaped illness behavior. Areas for further research regarding the etiologies of MCS are suggested. Recognizing that the cause of the syndrome may be multifactorial, strategies are proposed for clinical evaluation and management in Part II of this manuscript using a biopsychosocial model of illness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信