某儿童医院Coulter MAXM的评价。

C Lacombe, F Picard, J P Lévy
{"title":"某儿童医院Coulter MAXM的评价。","authors":"C Lacombe,&nbsp;F Picard,&nbsp;J P Lévy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An evaluation of the WBC differential given by the analyzer Coulter MAXM was performed in a children's hospital, in order to establish optimal interpretation of the automated MAXM report in pediatrics. The patient group comprised 419 children of age up to 15 years. Assessment was carried out by comparison of the MAXM results with microscopic examination of blood smears, good correlation being observed between the two methods in non flagged samples and those flagged only with an isolated \"Imm Grans/Bands 1\" message indicating the presence of band cells. Comparison of the MAXM and optical differentials in normal and abnormal samples was performed according to a standard protocol taking into account both suspect flags and quantitative abnormalities defined in relation to age. In this group of 419 children, there were 20 (4.8%) false positive and 8 (1.9%) false negative reports, the 8 false negative results corresponding to either minor morphological (4) or borderline quantitative abnormalities (4). Overall, the instrument was capable of detecting significant abnormalities in blood samples with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 91.7%. Although the review rate was 45.3%, the high efficiency (93.3%) suggested that most blood smear reviews led to the discovery of a morphological and/or quantitative abnormality. Furthermore, the review rate was greater in neonates (< 7 days) and infants (7 days-1 year) but closer to those of adult populations in older children. The Coulter MAXM was thus shown to be appropriate for use in pediatrics, despite a higher frequency of blood smear review than in adults, particularly among patients less than one year old.</p>","PeriodicalId":19366,"journal":{"name":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","volume":"36 5","pages":"343-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Coulter MAXM in a children's hospital.\",\"authors\":\"C Lacombe,&nbsp;F Picard,&nbsp;J P Lévy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An evaluation of the WBC differential given by the analyzer Coulter MAXM was performed in a children's hospital, in order to establish optimal interpretation of the automated MAXM report in pediatrics. The patient group comprised 419 children of age up to 15 years. Assessment was carried out by comparison of the MAXM results with microscopic examination of blood smears, good correlation being observed between the two methods in non flagged samples and those flagged only with an isolated \\\"Imm Grans/Bands 1\\\" message indicating the presence of band cells. Comparison of the MAXM and optical differentials in normal and abnormal samples was performed according to a standard protocol taking into account both suspect flags and quantitative abnormalities defined in relation to age. In this group of 419 children, there were 20 (4.8%) false positive and 8 (1.9%) false negative reports, the 8 false negative results corresponding to either minor morphological (4) or borderline quantitative abnormalities (4). Overall, the instrument was capable of detecting significant abnormalities in blood samples with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 91.7%. Although the review rate was 45.3%, the high efficiency (93.3%) suggested that most blood smear reviews led to the discovery of a morphological and/or quantitative abnormality. Furthermore, the review rate was greater in neonates (< 7 days) and infants (7 days-1 year) but closer to those of adult populations in older children. The Coulter MAXM was thus shown to be appropriate for use in pediatrics, despite a higher frequency of blood smear review than in adults, particularly among patients less than one year old.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"343-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了建立儿科自动MAXM报告的最佳解释,在一家儿童医院对库尔特MAXM分析仪给出的白细胞差异进行了评估。患者组包括419名15岁以下的儿童。通过将MAXM结果与血片显微镜检查进行比较来进行评估,在未标记的样品和仅标记有孤立的“Imm Grans/Bands 1”信息的样品中,两种方法之间观察到良好的相关性,表明存在带状细胞。根据标准方案进行正常和异常样品的MAXM和光学差异的比较,同时考虑到可疑标志和与年龄相关的定量异常。在这组419名儿童中,有20例(4.8%)假阳性和8例(1.9%)假阴性报告,这8例假阴性结果对应于轻微的形态学异常(4)或边缘性定量异常(4)。总体而言,该仪器能够检测血液样本中的显着异常,灵敏度为95.5%,特异性为91.7%。虽然复查率为45.3%,但高效率(93.3%)表明大多数血液涂片复查导致发现形态和/或定量异常。此外,新生儿(< 7天)和婴儿(7天至1岁)的复查率更高,但更接近年龄较大儿童的成人人群。因此,Coulter MAXM适用于儿科,尽管血液涂片检查的频率高于成人,特别是一岁以下的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Coulter MAXM in a children's hospital.

An evaluation of the WBC differential given by the analyzer Coulter MAXM was performed in a children's hospital, in order to establish optimal interpretation of the automated MAXM report in pediatrics. The patient group comprised 419 children of age up to 15 years. Assessment was carried out by comparison of the MAXM results with microscopic examination of blood smears, good correlation being observed between the two methods in non flagged samples and those flagged only with an isolated "Imm Grans/Bands 1" message indicating the presence of band cells. Comparison of the MAXM and optical differentials in normal and abnormal samples was performed according to a standard protocol taking into account both suspect flags and quantitative abnormalities defined in relation to age. In this group of 419 children, there were 20 (4.8%) false positive and 8 (1.9%) false negative reports, the 8 false negative results corresponding to either minor morphological (4) or borderline quantitative abnormalities (4). Overall, the instrument was capable of detecting significant abnormalities in blood samples with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 91.7%. Although the review rate was 45.3%, the high efficiency (93.3%) suggested that most blood smear reviews led to the discovery of a morphological and/or quantitative abnormality. Furthermore, the review rate was greater in neonates (< 7 days) and infants (7 days-1 year) but closer to those of adult populations in older children. The Coulter MAXM was thus shown to be appropriate for use in pediatrics, despite a higher frequency of blood smear review than in adults, particularly among patients less than one year old.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信