[秘鲁医生的处方习惯及影响因素]。

E Zárate Cárdenas, L Llosa Isenrich
{"title":"[秘鲁医生的处方习惯及影响因素]。","authors":"E Zárate Cárdenas,&nbsp;L Llosa Isenrich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study to determine what sources of information influence the prescription habits of Peruvian physicians, how those habits are modified by experience, and how appropriate the prescribed drug treatment is for certain common ailments was carried out from September 1991 to December 1992. A questionnaire was administered to 800 physicians in two urban fringe areas of Lima and Chimbote. Of those doctors, 184 had established practices and 309 were recent graduates. The questionnaire asked what sources of information determined prescribing behavior, what medicines were and were not indispensable in outpatient clinical practice, and what drug treatments were appropriate for iron deficiency anemia and lower urinary tract infections in women. The answers showed that knowledge acquired in medical school had little influence on the prescribing habits of either group of doctors. More than two-thirds stated that their principal source of pharmacologic information was the scientific literature: 69.9% of the practicing physicians and 79.9% of the recent graduates, with the difference between the groups being statistically significant (P < 0.01). The drugs that were indispensable in ambulatory practice were correctly identified by 28.8% of the physicians, while 28.9% correctly answered the question on what groups of drugs should not be prescribed. The differences between the two groups were not significant. On the other hand, 60% of the established physicians and 52% of the recent graduates gave the right answers to the questions on treatment of iron deficiency anemia and urinary tract infection, and there was no significant difference between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":75611,"journal":{"name":"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau","volume":"118 6","pages":"479-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Prescription habits of Peruvian doctors and factors influencing them].\",\"authors\":\"E Zárate Cárdenas,&nbsp;L Llosa Isenrich\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A study to determine what sources of information influence the prescription habits of Peruvian physicians, how those habits are modified by experience, and how appropriate the prescribed drug treatment is for certain common ailments was carried out from September 1991 to December 1992. A questionnaire was administered to 800 physicians in two urban fringe areas of Lima and Chimbote. Of those doctors, 184 had established practices and 309 were recent graduates. The questionnaire asked what sources of information determined prescribing behavior, what medicines were and were not indispensable in outpatient clinical practice, and what drug treatments were appropriate for iron deficiency anemia and lower urinary tract infections in women. The answers showed that knowledge acquired in medical school had little influence on the prescribing habits of either group of doctors. More than two-thirds stated that their principal source of pharmacologic information was the scientific literature: 69.9% of the practicing physicians and 79.9% of the recent graduates, with the difference between the groups being statistically significant (P < 0.01). The drugs that were indispensable in ambulatory practice were correctly identified by 28.8% of the physicians, while 28.9% correctly answered the question on what groups of drugs should not be prescribed. The differences between the two groups were not significant. On the other hand, 60% of the established physicians and 52% of the recent graduates gave the right answers to the questions on treatment of iron deficiency anemia and urinary tract infection, and there was no significant difference between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau\",\"volume\":\"118 6\",\"pages\":\"479-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1991年9月至1992年12月进行了一项研究,以确定哪些信息来源影响秘鲁医生的处方习惯,经验如何改变这些习惯,以及处方药物治疗对某些常见病的适宜程度。对利马和钦博特两个城市边缘地区的800名医生进行了问卷调查。在这些医生中,184人已经开业,309人是刚毕业的。问卷询问了哪些信息来源决定了处方行为,哪些药物在门诊临床实践中是必不可少的,哪些药物不是必不可少的,哪些药物治疗适合女性缺铁性贫血和下尿路感染。答案显示,在医学院获得的知识对两组医生的处方习惯影响不大。超过三分之二的人表示他们的主要药理信息来源是科学文献,69.9%的执业医师和79.9%的应届毕业生,组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。28.8%的医生正确识别了门诊必备药物,28.9%的医生正确回答了不应开哪类药物的问题。两组之间的差异不显著。另一方面,60%的在职医师和52%的应届毕业生对缺铁性贫血和尿路感染治疗的问题给出了正确的答案,两组之间没有显著差异。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Prescription habits of Peruvian doctors and factors influencing them].

A study to determine what sources of information influence the prescription habits of Peruvian physicians, how those habits are modified by experience, and how appropriate the prescribed drug treatment is for certain common ailments was carried out from September 1991 to December 1992. A questionnaire was administered to 800 physicians in two urban fringe areas of Lima and Chimbote. Of those doctors, 184 had established practices and 309 were recent graduates. The questionnaire asked what sources of information determined prescribing behavior, what medicines were and were not indispensable in outpatient clinical practice, and what drug treatments were appropriate for iron deficiency anemia and lower urinary tract infections in women. The answers showed that knowledge acquired in medical school had little influence on the prescribing habits of either group of doctors. More than two-thirds stated that their principal source of pharmacologic information was the scientific literature: 69.9% of the practicing physicians and 79.9% of the recent graduates, with the difference between the groups being statistically significant (P < 0.01). The drugs that were indispensable in ambulatory practice were correctly identified by 28.8% of the physicians, while 28.9% correctly answered the question on what groups of drugs should not be prescribed. The differences between the two groups were not significant. On the other hand, 60% of the established physicians and 52% of the recent graduates gave the right answers to the questions on treatment of iron deficiency anemia and urinary tract infection, and there was no significant difference between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信