药物研究:一种制度方法论。

R S Geter
{"title":"药物研究:一种制度方法论。","authors":"R S Geter","doi":"10.3109/10826089509048748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author raises the question of whether or not valid qualitative data on various aspects of drug use can be collected from recovering addicts in institutional settings. To address this issue the author explores the advantages of interviewing institutionalized, recovering addicts, and evaluates the following field practices: 1) using active street addicts as informants, 2) recruiting recovering addicts as \"tour guides\" (i.e., field escorts), and 3) employing \"ex-addicts\" as addict locators, data collectors, and data validators. The author concludes that collecting qualitative data about addicts in institutional settings is a legitimate, ethical alternative to finding and collecting data from street addicts and offers five recommendations to guide data collection and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":76639,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of the addictions","volume":"30 5","pages":"617-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10826089509048748","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Research: an institutional methodology.\",\"authors\":\"R S Geter\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10826089509048748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The author raises the question of whether or not valid qualitative data on various aspects of drug use can be collected from recovering addicts in institutional settings. To address this issue the author explores the advantages of interviewing institutionalized, recovering addicts, and evaluates the following field practices: 1) using active street addicts as informants, 2) recruiting recovering addicts as \\\"tour guides\\\" (i.e., field escorts), and 3) employing \\\"ex-addicts\\\" as addict locators, data collectors, and data validators. The author concludes that collecting qualitative data about addicts in institutional settings is a legitimate, ethical alternative to finding and collecting data from street addicts and offers five recommendations to guide data collection and reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of the addictions\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"617-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10826089509048748\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of the addictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089509048748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of the addictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089509048748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作者提出的问题是,能否从机构环境中康复的吸毒者那里收集到有关吸毒各个方面的有效定性数据。为了解决这个问题,作者探讨了采访制度化的康复成瘾者的优势,并评估了以下实地实践:1)使用活跃的街头成瘾者作为线人,2)招募康复成瘾者作为“导游”(即现场护送),以及3)雇用“前成瘾者”作为成瘾者定位者,数据收集者和数据验证者。作者的结论是,在机构环境中收集有关成瘾者的定性数据是一种合法的、合乎道德的选择,而不是从街头成瘾者那里寻找和收集数据,并提出了指导数据收集和报告的五条建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug Research: an institutional methodology.

The author raises the question of whether or not valid qualitative data on various aspects of drug use can be collected from recovering addicts in institutional settings. To address this issue the author explores the advantages of interviewing institutionalized, recovering addicts, and evaluates the following field practices: 1) using active street addicts as informants, 2) recruiting recovering addicts as "tour guides" (i.e., field escorts), and 3) employing "ex-addicts" as addict locators, data collectors, and data validators. The author concludes that collecting qualitative data about addicts in institutional settings is a legitimate, ethical alternative to finding and collecting data from street addicts and offers five recommendations to guide data collection and reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信