抗术后粘连——氧化再生纤维素与组织纤溶酶原激活剂结合的效果。

C Bothin
{"title":"抗术后粘连——氧化再生纤维素与组织纤溶酶原激活剂结合的效果。","authors":"C Bothin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE -- Postsurgical adhesion formation remains an unpredictable complication in operative surgery but is of special importance to the infertility surgeon. Recent reports on recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) have been promising. The present study set forth to verify these results and to explore possible synergistic effects of these two agents. METHODS -- Four groups of five rats each were subjected to a standardized caecal crush model and treated with ORC, tPA, a combination of these two or nothing. RESULTS -- The ORC group had significantly more postoperative adhesions than the other two groups (P < .05). This adhesion-promoting effect was mitigated when ORC was combined with tPA. The tPA group did not differ from the control group. CONCLUSIONS -- ORC and tPA were unable to decrease adhesion formation in rats with the current type of lesion. Nevertheless, tPA mitigated the adhesion-increasing effect of ORC. These findings underline the need for more research to establish the antiadhesion properties of ORC and tPA and lend support to the notion that all adhesions are not alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":79342,"journal":{"name":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","volume":"40 2","pages":"102-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counteracting postsurgical adhesions--the effect of combining oxidized regenerated cellulose and tissue plasminogen activator.\",\"authors\":\"C Bothin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>OBJECTIVE -- Postsurgical adhesion formation remains an unpredictable complication in operative surgery but is of special importance to the infertility surgeon. Recent reports on recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) have been promising. The present study set forth to verify these results and to explore possible synergistic effects of these two agents. METHODS -- Four groups of five rats each were subjected to a standardized caecal crush model and treated with ORC, tPA, a combination of these two or nothing. RESULTS -- The ORC group had significantly more postoperative adhesions than the other two groups (P < .05). This adhesion-promoting effect was mitigated when ORC was combined with tPA. The tPA group did not differ from the control group. CONCLUSIONS -- ORC and tPA were unable to decrease adhesion formation in rats with the current type of lesion. Nevertheless, tPA mitigated the adhesion-increasing effect of ORC. These findings underline the need for more research to establish the antiadhesion properties of ORC and tPA and lend support to the notion that all adhesions are not alike.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"102-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:术后粘连形成仍然是外科手术中不可预测的并发症,但对不孕症外科医生特别重要。近年来,重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)和氧化再生纤维素(ORC)的研究取得了可喜的进展。本研究旨在验证这些结果,并探讨这两种药物可能的协同作用。方法:四组每组5只大鼠接受标准化的盲肠挤压模型,并给予ORC、tPA、这两种药物的联合治疗或不治疗。结果:ORC组术后粘连发生率明显高于其他两组(P < 0.05)。当ORC与tPA联合使用时,这种促进粘附的作用减弱。tPA组与对照组没有差异。结论:ORC和tPA不能减少当前类型病变大鼠的粘连形成。然而,tPA减轻了ORC的粘连增加作用。这些发现强调需要更多的研究来确定ORC和tPA的抗粘连性能,并支持所有粘连都不一样的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Counteracting postsurgical adhesions--the effect of combining oxidized regenerated cellulose and tissue plasminogen activator.

OBJECTIVE -- Postsurgical adhesion formation remains an unpredictable complication in operative surgery but is of special importance to the infertility surgeon. Recent reports on recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) have been promising. The present study set forth to verify these results and to explore possible synergistic effects of these two agents. METHODS -- Four groups of five rats each were subjected to a standardized caecal crush model and treated with ORC, tPA, a combination of these two or nothing. RESULTS -- The ORC group had significantly more postoperative adhesions than the other two groups (P < .05). This adhesion-promoting effect was mitigated when ORC was combined with tPA. The tPA group did not differ from the control group. CONCLUSIONS -- ORC and tPA were unable to decrease adhesion formation in rats with the current type of lesion. Nevertheless, tPA mitigated the adhesion-increasing effect of ORC. These findings underline the need for more research to establish the antiadhesion properties of ORC and tPA and lend support to the notion that all adhesions are not alike.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信