患者与正畸-口腔手术联合治疗相关的动机和经验。一项考虑临床和社会心理因素的患者调查。

A Jäger, G Flechsig, H G Luhr
{"title":"患者与正畸-口腔手术联合治疗相关的动机和经验。一项考虑临床和社会心理因素的患者调查。","authors":"A Jäger,&nbsp;G Flechsig,&nbsp;H G Luhr","doi":"10.1007/BF02299667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a retrospective study 140 patients, 97 females and 43 males who had undergone combined orthodontic surgical therapy between 1984 and 1992, were interviewed using a questionnaire. The \"closed form\" questions were designed to provide insight into the patients' motivations for seeking treatment and into their perceptions of its course and outcome. Nine working hypotheses taken from the literature served as the study's starting point. The evaluation of the data gathered revealed that, contrary to other studies, the motivation for patients to seek treatment was not directly related to sex, i.e., was not sex specific, although this must be qualified. The unequal distribution of the sex of the patients who had sought treatment, and who were covered in the survey, points to differences between them in their decision making processes. When the results were evaluated, the data showed 92.2% patient satisfaction and even high satisfaction with treatment outcome. 86.4% of the patients stated that they would recommend the operation to others and 82.9% said that they would undergo the operation again. This high level of patient satisfaction was to a great degree directly attributable to, above all, the positive aesthetic result, the quality of the consultation and care, and to the absence of persisting postoperative complications. When the patients were divided into subgroups by means of using single criteria, significant varying degrees of satisfaction could be distinguished among segments of the subgroups. It was not possible, however, through the use of cluster analysis to separate out with precision the small group of patients who were not satisfied with the overall results of their treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":77135,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie","volume":"56 5","pages":"265-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02299667","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The motivation and experiences of patients in connection with orthodontic-oral surgery combined therapy. A patient survey with consideration of the clinical and psychosocial factors].\",\"authors\":\"A Jäger,&nbsp;G Flechsig,&nbsp;H G Luhr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02299667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a retrospective study 140 patients, 97 females and 43 males who had undergone combined orthodontic surgical therapy between 1984 and 1992, were interviewed using a questionnaire. The \\\"closed form\\\" questions were designed to provide insight into the patients' motivations for seeking treatment and into their perceptions of its course and outcome. Nine working hypotheses taken from the literature served as the study's starting point. The evaluation of the data gathered revealed that, contrary to other studies, the motivation for patients to seek treatment was not directly related to sex, i.e., was not sex specific, although this must be qualified. The unequal distribution of the sex of the patients who had sought treatment, and who were covered in the survey, points to differences between them in their decision making processes. When the results were evaluated, the data showed 92.2% patient satisfaction and even high satisfaction with treatment outcome. 86.4% of the patients stated that they would recommend the operation to others and 82.9% said that they would undergo the operation again. This high level of patient satisfaction was to a great degree directly attributable to, above all, the positive aesthetic result, the quality of the consultation and care, and to the absence of persisting postoperative complications. When the patients were divided into subgroups by means of using single criteria, significant varying degrees of satisfaction could be distinguished among segments of the subgroups. It was not possible, however, through the use of cluster analysis to separate out with precision the small group of patients who were not satisfied with the overall results of their treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"265-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02299667\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在回顾性研究中,采用问卷调查的方式对1984年至1992年间接受联合正畸手术治疗的140例患者进行了访谈,其中97例女性,43例男性。“封闭形式”的问题旨在深入了解患者寻求治疗的动机,以及他们对治疗过程和结果的看法。从文献中提取的九个有效假设作为研究的起点。对收集到的数据的评估显示,与其他研究相反,患者寻求治疗的动机与性别没有直接关系,即不是特定于性别的,尽管这必须是合格的。寻求治疗的患者和调查对象的性别分布不均,表明他们在决策过程中存在差异。结果评估时,数据显示92.2%的患者满意,甚至对治疗结果有较高的满意度。86.4%的患者表示会向他人推荐手术,82.9%的患者表示会再次接受手术。这种高水平的患者满意度在很大程度上直接归因于,首先,积极的美学效果,咨询和护理的质量,以及没有持续的术后并发症。当采用单一标准将患者划分为亚组时,不同亚组的患者满意度存在显著差异。然而,通过使用聚类分析,不可能精确地分离出对治疗总体结果不满意的一小部分患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The motivation and experiences of patients in connection with orthodontic-oral surgery combined therapy. A patient survey with consideration of the clinical and psychosocial factors].

In a retrospective study 140 patients, 97 females and 43 males who had undergone combined orthodontic surgical therapy between 1984 and 1992, were interviewed using a questionnaire. The "closed form" questions were designed to provide insight into the patients' motivations for seeking treatment and into their perceptions of its course and outcome. Nine working hypotheses taken from the literature served as the study's starting point. The evaluation of the data gathered revealed that, contrary to other studies, the motivation for patients to seek treatment was not directly related to sex, i.e., was not sex specific, although this must be qualified. The unequal distribution of the sex of the patients who had sought treatment, and who were covered in the survey, points to differences between them in their decision making processes. When the results were evaluated, the data showed 92.2% patient satisfaction and even high satisfaction with treatment outcome. 86.4% of the patients stated that they would recommend the operation to others and 82.9% said that they would undergo the operation again. This high level of patient satisfaction was to a great degree directly attributable to, above all, the positive aesthetic result, the quality of the consultation and care, and to the absence of persisting postoperative complications. When the patients were divided into subgroups by means of using single criteria, significant varying degrees of satisfaction could be distinguished among segments of the subgroups. It was not possible, however, through the use of cluster analysis to separate out with precision the small group of patients who were not satisfied with the overall results of their treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信