间变性精原细胞瘤与典型精原细胞瘤的免疫组化比较。

T Suzuki, H Sasano, H Aoki, H Nagura, N Sasano, T Sano, M Saito, T Watanuki, H Kato, S Aizawa
{"title":"间变性精原细胞瘤与典型精原细胞瘤的免疫组化比较。","authors":"T Suzuki,&nbsp;H Sasano,&nbsp;H Aoki,&nbsp;H Nagura,&nbsp;N Sasano,&nbsp;T Sano,&nbsp;M Saito,&nbsp;T Watanuki,&nbsp;H Kato,&nbsp;S Aizawa","doi":"10.1111/j.1440-1827.1993.tb02562.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to study the possible biological differences between anaplastic and typical seminoma, the following factors were studied in 11 cases of anaplastic seminoma and 15 cases of typical seminoma: mitotic activity, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression, immunohistochemical analyses for cytokeratin, vimentin, placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and c-myc oncoprotein. Anaplastic seminoma was classified according to Mostofi's criteria, which is primarily based on the mitotic activity of the tumor. Mitotic activity was evaluated by both mitotic count and rate. Statistically significant correlations were observed between mitotic count and mitotic rate (R = 0.891), and between the mitotic count and PCNA labeling index (R = 0.792), in both typical and anaplastic seminomas. Immunostaining patterns for cytokeratin, vimentin, PLAP, beta-hCG, AFP and c-myc oncoprotein were not significantly different between typical and anaplastic seminoma. The present data indicated that no apparent clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical parameters discerning anaplastic seminoma from typical seminoma were present, when identifying anaplastic seminoma on the basis of high mitotic count. Anaplastic seminoma may therefore simply represent seminoma with high proliferative activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":75413,"journal":{"name":"Acta pathologica japonica","volume":"43 12","pages":"751-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1440-1827.1993.tb02562.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunohistochemical comparison between anaplastic seminoma and typical seminoma.\",\"authors\":\"T Suzuki,&nbsp;H Sasano,&nbsp;H Aoki,&nbsp;H Nagura,&nbsp;N Sasano,&nbsp;T Sano,&nbsp;M Saito,&nbsp;T Watanuki,&nbsp;H Kato,&nbsp;S Aizawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1440-1827.1993.tb02562.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to study the possible biological differences between anaplastic and typical seminoma, the following factors were studied in 11 cases of anaplastic seminoma and 15 cases of typical seminoma: mitotic activity, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression, immunohistochemical analyses for cytokeratin, vimentin, placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and c-myc oncoprotein. Anaplastic seminoma was classified according to Mostofi's criteria, which is primarily based on the mitotic activity of the tumor. Mitotic activity was evaluated by both mitotic count and rate. Statistically significant correlations were observed between mitotic count and mitotic rate (R = 0.891), and between the mitotic count and PCNA labeling index (R = 0.792), in both typical and anaplastic seminomas. Immunostaining patterns for cytokeratin, vimentin, PLAP, beta-hCG, AFP and c-myc oncoprotein were not significantly different between typical and anaplastic seminoma. The present data indicated that no apparent clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical parameters discerning anaplastic seminoma from typical seminoma were present, when identifying anaplastic seminoma on the basis of high mitotic count. Anaplastic seminoma may therefore simply represent seminoma with high proliferative activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta pathologica japonica\",\"volume\":\"43 12\",\"pages\":\"751-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1440-1827.1993.tb02562.x\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta pathologica japonica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.1993.tb02562.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pathologica japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.1993.tb02562.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

为了探讨间变性精原细胞瘤与典型精原细胞瘤可能存在的生物学差异,我们对11例间变性精原细胞瘤和15例典型精原细胞瘤进行了有丝分裂活性、增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)表达、细胞角蛋白、vimentin、胎盘碱性磷酸酶(PLAP)、β -人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β - hcg)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)和c-myc癌蛋白的免疫组化分析。间变性精原细胞瘤根据Mostofi的标准进行分类,该标准主要基于肿瘤的有丝分裂活性。用有丝分裂计数和有丝分裂率评价有丝分裂活性。在典型精原细胞瘤和间变性精原细胞瘤中,有丝分裂计数与有丝分裂率(R = 0.891)、有丝分裂计数与PCNA标记指数(R = 0.792)具有统计学意义的相关性。细胞角蛋白、波形蛋白、PLAP、β - hcg、AFP和c-myc癌蛋白的免疫染色模式在典型精原细胞瘤和间变性精原细胞瘤之间无显著差异。目前的数据表明,没有明显的临床病理和免疫组织化学参数来区分间变性精原细胞瘤和典型的精原细胞瘤,当根据高有丝分裂计数来识别间变性精原细胞瘤时。因此间变性精原细胞瘤可能仅仅代表具有高增殖活性的精原细胞瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immunohistochemical comparison between anaplastic seminoma and typical seminoma.

In order to study the possible biological differences between anaplastic and typical seminoma, the following factors were studied in 11 cases of anaplastic seminoma and 15 cases of typical seminoma: mitotic activity, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression, immunohistochemical analyses for cytokeratin, vimentin, placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and c-myc oncoprotein. Anaplastic seminoma was classified according to Mostofi's criteria, which is primarily based on the mitotic activity of the tumor. Mitotic activity was evaluated by both mitotic count and rate. Statistically significant correlations were observed between mitotic count and mitotic rate (R = 0.891), and between the mitotic count and PCNA labeling index (R = 0.792), in both typical and anaplastic seminomas. Immunostaining patterns for cytokeratin, vimentin, PLAP, beta-hCG, AFP and c-myc oncoprotein were not significantly different between typical and anaplastic seminoma. The present data indicated that no apparent clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical parameters discerning anaplastic seminoma from typical seminoma were present, when identifying anaplastic seminoma on the basis of high mitotic count. Anaplastic seminoma may therefore simply represent seminoma with high proliferative activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信