儿童、青少年和成人的手偏好报告:选择任务的同质性和辨别能力。

M J Roszkowski, G E Snelbecker, R Sacks
{"title":"儿童、青少年和成人的手偏好报告:选择任务的同质性和辨别能力。","authors":"M J Roszkowski,&nbsp;G E Snelbecker,&nbsp;R Sacks","doi":"10.1080/01688638108403126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A factor analysis, measures of internal consistency, and item analyses were conducted on the self-reported hand preference for the 15 activities recommended by Raczkowski, Kalat, and Nebes (1974) as reliable and valid indices of hand preference. Data from 1952 subjects, ranging in age from 8 to 70 years, were analyzed in toto as well as by age and sex. The factor analysis revealed the presence of only a single dimension. The internal consistency was uniformly high for all age and sex cohorts (a greater than or equal to .91). The item analyses showed that, in the aggregate, preference for hammering, drawing, and writing were the activities most strongly correlated with hand dominance determined on the basis of an unweighted composite of all the tasks. However, at ages 9 and 10, the hand used for hammering was not as strong an indicator of overall hand preference as writing and drawing. In contrast, with adult subjects (19 years and older), writing and drawing were slightly less satisfactory measures of overall manual preference, while use of hammer retained its high predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":79225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","volume":"3 3","pages":"199-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638108403126","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children's, adolescents', and adults' reports of hand preference: homogeneity and discriminating power of selected tasks.\",\"authors\":\"M J Roszkowski,&nbsp;G E Snelbecker,&nbsp;R Sacks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01688638108403126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A factor analysis, measures of internal consistency, and item analyses were conducted on the self-reported hand preference for the 15 activities recommended by Raczkowski, Kalat, and Nebes (1974) as reliable and valid indices of hand preference. Data from 1952 subjects, ranging in age from 8 to 70 years, were analyzed in toto as well as by age and sex. The factor analysis revealed the presence of only a single dimension. The internal consistency was uniformly high for all age and sex cohorts (a greater than or equal to .91). The item analyses showed that, in the aggregate, preference for hammering, drawing, and writing were the activities most strongly correlated with hand dominance determined on the basis of an unweighted composite of all the tasks. However, at ages 9 and 10, the hand used for hammering was not as strong an indicator of overall hand preference as writing and drawing. In contrast, with adult subjects (19 years and older), writing and drawing were slightly less satisfactory measures of overall manual preference, while use of hammer retained its high predictive value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"199-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638108403126\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638108403126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638108403126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

对Raczkowski、Kalat和Nebes(1974)推荐的15种活动的自述手偏好进行了因子分析、内部一致性测量和项目分析,这些活动是手偏好的可靠和有效指标。研究人员对1952名年龄在8岁到70岁之间的受试者的数据进行了整体分析,并按年龄和性别进行了分析。因子分析显示只有一个维度的存在。所有年龄和性别队列的内部一致性一致高(大于等于0.91)。项目分析表明,总体而言,对锤击、绘画和写作的偏好是与手优势关系最密切的活动,这是在所有任务的未加权综合的基础上确定的。然而,在9岁和10岁的孩子中,用于锤击的手并不像写作和绘画那样是整体手偏好的重要指标。相比之下,对于成人受试者(19岁及以上),写作和绘画是略不令人满意的整体手工偏好措施,而使用锤子保持其高预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children's, adolescents', and adults' reports of hand preference: homogeneity and discriminating power of selected tasks.

A factor analysis, measures of internal consistency, and item analyses were conducted on the self-reported hand preference for the 15 activities recommended by Raczkowski, Kalat, and Nebes (1974) as reliable and valid indices of hand preference. Data from 1952 subjects, ranging in age from 8 to 70 years, were analyzed in toto as well as by age and sex. The factor analysis revealed the presence of only a single dimension. The internal consistency was uniformly high for all age and sex cohorts (a greater than or equal to .91). The item analyses showed that, in the aggregate, preference for hammering, drawing, and writing were the activities most strongly correlated with hand dominance determined on the basis of an unweighted composite of all the tasks. However, at ages 9 and 10, the hand used for hammering was not as strong an indicator of overall hand preference as writing and drawing. In contrast, with adult subjects (19 years and older), writing and drawing were slightly less satisfactory measures of overall manual preference, while use of hammer retained its high predictive value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信