{"title":"原发性前列腺素对离体犬肾动静脉的影响","authors":"Naresh Chand, Burton M. Altura","doi":"10.1016/0161-4630(81)90007-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sensitivity and contractility of isolated canine renal arteries (RA) and renal veins (RV) to primary prostaglandin compounds (PG) was studied. Studies were also undertaken to determine whether specific receptors for PGs exist in RA and RV.RA and RV exhibited potent concentration-dependent contractile responses to all the primary PGs studied, including PGA<sub>1</sub>, PGA<sub>2</sub>, PGB<sub>2</sub>, PGD<sub>2</sub>, PGE<sub>1</sub>, PGE<sub>2</sub>, PGF<sub>1∝</sub> and PGF<sub>2∝</sub>. The contractile sensitivity (based on EC50's) of canine RA to PGs was. PGB<sub>2</sub> > PGB<sub>1</sub> ⋟ PGE<sub>2</sub> > PGF<sub>2∝</sub> ⋟PGA<sub>2</sub> ⋟ PGD<sub>2</sub> ⋟ PGA<sub>1</sub> > PGF<sub>1∝</sub> > PGE<sub>1</sub>, whereas for RV it was:PGB<sub>2</sub> > PGB<sub>1</sub> ⋟ PGD2 = PGF<sub>2∝</sub> > PGA<sub>2</sub> = PGA<sub>1</sub> > PGE<sub>2</sub> >>> PGF<sub>1∝</sub> = PGE<sub>1</sub>.In terms of the ability to generate a maximum contractile response on RA, PGB<sub>2</sub> was the most potent and PGDthe least potent, whereas for RV PGF<sub>2∝</sub> and PGB<sub>2</sub> was the most potent and PGF<sub>1∝</sub> and PGE the least potent. Canine RA failed to elicit any consistent relaxant responses to PGE<sub>1</sub>, PGE<sub>2</sub>, PGA<sub>1</sub>, and PGA<sub>2</sub>. Renal veins, however, in which tone was induced by either PGs or serotonin responded with concentration-related relaxations to PGE<sub>1</sub>; other primary PGs did not induce relaxations on isolated RV. Use of specific pharmacologic antagonists (for catecholamines, serotonin, acetylcholine and histamine) failed to interfere with any of the PG responses. The data indicate that RA and RV: a) can exhibit differential responses to primary PGs; b) exhibit structure-activity relationships for the contractile action of PGs; and c) appear to have specific receptors for primary PGs which primarily subserve contraction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76381,"journal":{"name":"Prostaglandins and medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 49-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0161-4630(81)90007-0","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of primary prostaglandins on isolated canine renal arteries and veins\",\"authors\":\"Naresh Chand, Burton M. Altura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0161-4630(81)90007-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The sensitivity and contractility of isolated canine renal arteries (RA) and renal veins (RV) to primary prostaglandin compounds (PG) was studied. Studies were also undertaken to determine whether specific receptors for PGs exist in RA and RV.RA and RV exhibited potent concentration-dependent contractile responses to all the primary PGs studied, including PGA<sub>1</sub>, PGA<sub>2</sub>, PGB<sub>2</sub>, PGD<sub>2</sub>, PGE<sub>1</sub>, PGE<sub>2</sub>, PGF<sub>1∝</sub> and PGF<sub>2∝</sub>. The contractile sensitivity (based on EC50's) of canine RA to PGs was. PGB<sub>2</sub> > PGB<sub>1</sub> ⋟ PGE<sub>2</sub> > PGF<sub>2∝</sub> ⋟PGA<sub>2</sub> ⋟ PGD<sub>2</sub> ⋟ PGA<sub>1</sub> > PGF<sub>1∝</sub> > PGE<sub>1</sub>, whereas for RV it was:PGB<sub>2</sub> > PGB<sub>1</sub> ⋟ PGD2 = PGF<sub>2∝</sub> > PGA<sub>2</sub> = PGA<sub>1</sub> > PGE<sub>2</sub> >>> PGF<sub>1∝</sub> = PGE<sub>1</sub>.In terms of the ability to generate a maximum contractile response on RA, PGB<sub>2</sub> was the most potent and PGDthe least potent, whereas for RV PGF<sub>2∝</sub> and PGB<sub>2</sub> was the most potent and PGF<sub>1∝</sub> and PGE the least potent. Canine RA failed to elicit any consistent relaxant responses to PGE<sub>1</sub>, PGE<sub>2</sub>, PGA<sub>1</sub>, and PGA<sub>2</sub>. Renal veins, however, in which tone was induced by either PGs or serotonin responded with concentration-related relaxations to PGE<sub>1</sub>; other primary PGs did not induce relaxations on isolated RV. Use of specific pharmacologic antagonists (for catecholamines, serotonin, acetylcholine and histamine) failed to interfere with any of the PG responses. The data indicate that RA and RV: a) can exhibit differential responses to primary PGs; b) exhibit structure-activity relationships for the contractile action of PGs; and c) appear to have specific receptors for primary PGs which primarily subserve contraction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostaglandins and medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 49-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0161-4630(81)90007-0\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostaglandins and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0161463081900070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostaglandins and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0161463081900070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of primary prostaglandins on isolated canine renal arteries and veins
The sensitivity and contractility of isolated canine renal arteries (RA) and renal veins (RV) to primary prostaglandin compounds (PG) was studied. Studies were also undertaken to determine whether specific receptors for PGs exist in RA and RV.RA and RV exhibited potent concentration-dependent contractile responses to all the primary PGs studied, including PGA1, PGA2, PGB2, PGD2, PGE1, PGE2, PGF1∝ and PGF2∝. The contractile sensitivity (based on EC50's) of canine RA to PGs was. PGB2 > PGB1 ⋟ PGE2 > PGF2∝ ⋟PGA2 ⋟ PGD2 ⋟ PGA1 > PGF1∝ > PGE1, whereas for RV it was:PGB2 > PGB1 ⋟ PGD2 = PGF2∝ > PGA2 = PGA1 > PGE2 >>> PGF1∝ = PGE1.In terms of the ability to generate a maximum contractile response on RA, PGB2 was the most potent and PGDthe least potent, whereas for RV PGF2∝ and PGB2 was the most potent and PGF1∝ and PGE the least potent. Canine RA failed to elicit any consistent relaxant responses to PGE1, PGE2, PGA1, and PGA2. Renal veins, however, in which tone was induced by either PGs or serotonin responded with concentration-related relaxations to PGE1; other primary PGs did not induce relaxations on isolated RV. Use of specific pharmacologic antagonists (for catecholamines, serotonin, acetylcholine and histamine) failed to interfere with any of the PG responses. The data indicate that RA and RV: a) can exhibit differential responses to primary PGs; b) exhibit structure-activity relationships for the contractile action of PGs; and c) appear to have specific receptors for primary PGs which primarily subserve contraction.