{"title":"听觉优势在两个言语二分任务中的一致性。","authors":"P Eling","doi":"10.1080/01688638208401143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In two experiments, ear advantage was studied for two verbal dichotic tasks, rhyme and category monitoring. For the two tasks, the same tapes were used; only the instructions, specifying the class of stimuli to which the subjects had to respond, were different. Consistency of ear advantage within subjects was low, which is contrary to prevailing assumptions.","PeriodicalId":79225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","volume":"4 4","pages":"367-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638208401143","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency of ear advantage in two verbal dichotic tasks.\",\"authors\":\"P Eling\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01688638208401143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In two experiments, ear advantage was studied for two verbal dichotic tasks, rhyme and category monitoring. For the two tasks, the same tapes were used; only the instructions, specifying the class of stimuli to which the subjects had to respond, were different. Consistency of ear advantage within subjects was low, which is contrary to prevailing assumptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"367-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638208401143\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638208401143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638208401143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consistency of ear advantage in two verbal dichotic tasks.
Abstract In two experiments, ear advantage was studied for two verbal dichotic tasks, rhyme and category monitoring. For the two tasks, the same tapes were used; only the instructions, specifying the class of stimuli to which the subjects had to respond, were different. Consistency of ear advantage within subjects was low, which is contrary to prevailing assumptions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
