严重自伤行为的非厌恶治疗:DRO和DRI的多重重复。

D Nolley, B Butterfield, A Fleming, P Muller
{"title":"严重自伤行为的非厌恶治疗:DRO和DRI的多重重复。","authors":"D Nolley,&nbsp;B Butterfield,&nbsp;A Fleming,&nbsp;P Muller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sixteen severely self-injurious residents of a state mental retardation facility were treated with conventional, non-aversive behavior modification techniques by the same staff over a four-year period. Although each resident had performed multiple self-injuries prior to treatment, including blindness, multiple permanent scars, punctured eardrums, etc., 12 of the 16 improved in terms of decreased frequency of self-injurious behavior (SIB) and decreased frequency of measurable physical injury; of these, seven ceased SIB altogether. Each resident's treatment was unique, which necessitated unique analyses of controlling antecedents and maintaining consequences. Two exclusive types of self-injurious residents became evident: a) those whose SIB was maintained by socially reinforcing consequences and b) those whose SIB was maintained by escape contingencies. The study suggests that in agencies where intensely aversive techniques cannot be used to treat SIB, occasional restraint control of behavior can be combined with intensive differential reinforcement of other (DRO) or incompatible (DRI) behavior to produce an extended but satisfactory probability of successful treatment. Similar to published results from intensely aversive treatment, mildly aversive treatment, which largely depended upon positive reinforcement of desirable alternative behaviors, did not completely suppress the most severe SIB.</p>","PeriodicalId":77876,"journal":{"name":"Monographs of the American Association on Mental Deficiency (1982)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonaversive treatment of severe self-injurious behavior: multiple replications with DRO and DRI.\",\"authors\":\"D Nolley,&nbsp;B Butterfield,&nbsp;A Fleming,&nbsp;P Muller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sixteen severely self-injurious residents of a state mental retardation facility were treated with conventional, non-aversive behavior modification techniques by the same staff over a four-year period. Although each resident had performed multiple self-injuries prior to treatment, including blindness, multiple permanent scars, punctured eardrums, etc., 12 of the 16 improved in terms of decreased frequency of self-injurious behavior (SIB) and decreased frequency of measurable physical injury; of these, seven ceased SIB altogether. Each resident's treatment was unique, which necessitated unique analyses of controlling antecedents and maintaining consequences. Two exclusive types of self-injurious residents became evident: a) those whose SIB was maintained by socially reinforcing consequences and b) those whose SIB was maintained by escape contingencies. The study suggests that in agencies where intensely aversive techniques cannot be used to treat SIB, occasional restraint control of behavior can be combined with intensive differential reinforcement of other (DRO) or incompatible (DRI) behavior to produce an extended but satisfactory probability of successful treatment. Similar to published results from intensely aversive treatment, mildly aversive treatment, which largely depended upon positive reinforcement of desirable alternative behaviors, did not completely suppress the most severe SIB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monographs of the American Association on Mental Deficiency (1982)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monographs of the American Association on Mental Deficiency (1982)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs of the American Association on Mental Deficiency (1982)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在四年的时间里,同一个工作人员用传统的、非厌恶的行为矫正技术对16名严重自残的精神病患者进行了治疗。虽然每个住院医师在治疗前都有多次自伤,包括失明、多处永久性疤痕、耳膜被刺破等,但16人中有12人在自伤行为(SIB)频率和可测量的身体伤害频率方面有所改善;其中七个国家完全停止了SIB。每个病人的治疗都是独特的,这就需要对控制前因和维持结果进行独特的分析。两种独特类型的自伤居民变得明显:a)通过社会强化后果维持自伤行为的居民和b)通过逃逸偶然性维持自伤行为的居民。研究表明,在无法使用强烈厌恶技术治疗SIB的机构中,偶尔的行为约束控制可以与其他(DRO)或不相容(DRI)行为的强化差异强化相结合,以产生更大但令人满意的成功治疗概率。与已发表的强烈厌恶治疗的结果相似,轻度厌恶治疗在很大程度上依赖于对理想替代行为的正强化,并没有完全抑制最严重的SIB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonaversive treatment of severe self-injurious behavior: multiple replications with DRO and DRI.

Sixteen severely self-injurious residents of a state mental retardation facility were treated with conventional, non-aversive behavior modification techniques by the same staff over a four-year period. Although each resident had performed multiple self-injuries prior to treatment, including blindness, multiple permanent scars, punctured eardrums, etc., 12 of the 16 improved in terms of decreased frequency of self-injurious behavior (SIB) and decreased frequency of measurable physical injury; of these, seven ceased SIB altogether. Each resident's treatment was unique, which necessitated unique analyses of controlling antecedents and maintaining consequences. Two exclusive types of self-injurious residents became evident: a) those whose SIB was maintained by socially reinforcing consequences and b) those whose SIB was maintained by escape contingencies. The study suggests that in agencies where intensely aversive techniques cannot be used to treat SIB, occasional restraint control of behavior can be combined with intensive differential reinforcement of other (DRO) or incompatible (DRI) behavior to produce an extended but satisfactory probability of successful treatment. Similar to published results from intensely aversive treatment, mildly aversive treatment, which largely depended upon positive reinforcement of desirable alternative behaviors, did not completely suppress the most severe SIB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信