抑郁障碍与焦虑状态关系的进一步研究。

M Roth, C Q Mountjoy, D Caetano
{"title":"抑郁障碍与焦虑状态关系的进一步研究。","authors":"M Roth,&nbsp;C Q Mountjoy,&nbsp;D Caetano","doi":"10.1055/s-2007-1019526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Results of two investigations into the relationship between anxiety states and depressive disorders are summarized. In the first study (117 patients), which was confined to neurotic forms of depressive and/or anxious affective disorder, analysis of the findings derived from systematic clinical examination and eight rating scales, seven of them supposedly unidimensional measures of the severity of emotional disturbance, made it possible to achieve clear separation of the patient population into two groups both in the full sample and in two randomly derived subsamples. A number of rating scales have been shown to be effective tools for diagnostic discrimination within the affective disorders. The second enquiry (152 patients) covered the entire range of disorders of affect. Multivariate analyses of data derived from Present State Examination (P.S.E.) differentiated the patient population into three main groups: 1) endogenous depression; 2) neurotic depression; and 3) anxiety neuroses. There was 84% agreement between the classification of patients into the groups \"anxiety state\" and \"depressive disorder\" and separation of the 152 patients also was achieved with the aid of ratings on the Maudsley Personality Inventory and the Cattell 16 PF Battery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19840,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatria","volume":"15 4","pages":"135-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-1019526","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further investigations into the relationship between depressive disorders and anxiety state.\",\"authors\":\"M Roth,&nbsp;C Q Mountjoy,&nbsp;D Caetano\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2007-1019526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Results of two investigations into the relationship between anxiety states and depressive disorders are summarized. In the first study (117 patients), which was confined to neurotic forms of depressive and/or anxious affective disorder, analysis of the findings derived from systematic clinical examination and eight rating scales, seven of them supposedly unidimensional measures of the severity of emotional disturbance, made it possible to achieve clear separation of the patient population into two groups both in the full sample and in two randomly derived subsamples. A number of rating scales have been shown to be effective tools for diagnostic discrimination within the affective disorders. The second enquiry (152 patients) covered the entire range of disorders of affect. Multivariate analyses of data derived from Present State Examination (P.S.E.) differentiated the patient population into three main groups: 1) endogenous depression; 2) neurotic depression; and 3) anxiety neuroses. There was 84% agreement between the classification of patients into the groups \\\"anxiety state\\\" and \\\"depressive disorder\\\" and separation of the 152 patients also was achieved with the aid of ratings on the Maudsley Personality Inventory and the Cattell 16 PF Battery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacopsychiatria\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"135-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-1019526\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacopsychiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1019526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1019526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文总结了两项关于焦虑状态与抑郁障碍关系的研究结果。第一项研究(117名患者)局限于抑郁和/或焦虑情感障碍的神经性形式,对系统临床检查和8个评定量表的结果进行分析,其中7个评定量表被认为是情绪障碍严重程度的一维测量,从而有可能将患者群体明确分为两组,包括完整样本和两个随机衍生的子样本。许多评定量表已被证明是情感性障碍中诊断歧视的有效工具。第二项调查(152名患者)涵盖了情感障碍的全部范围。来自现状检查(P.S.E.)数据的多变量分析将患者人群分为三大类:1)内源性抑郁症;2)神经性抑郁症;3)焦虑神经症。将患者分为“焦虑状态”组和“抑郁障碍”组的一致性为84%,并通过莫兹利人格量表和卡特尔16pf电池的评分对152例患者进行了分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Further investigations into the relationship between depressive disorders and anxiety state.

Results of two investigations into the relationship between anxiety states and depressive disorders are summarized. In the first study (117 patients), which was confined to neurotic forms of depressive and/or anxious affective disorder, analysis of the findings derived from systematic clinical examination and eight rating scales, seven of them supposedly unidimensional measures of the severity of emotional disturbance, made it possible to achieve clear separation of the patient population into two groups both in the full sample and in two randomly derived subsamples. A number of rating scales have been shown to be effective tools for diagnostic discrimination within the affective disorders. The second enquiry (152 patients) covered the entire range of disorders of affect. Multivariate analyses of data derived from Present State Examination (P.S.E.) differentiated the patient population into three main groups: 1) endogenous depression; 2) neurotic depression; and 3) anxiety neuroses. There was 84% agreement between the classification of patients into the groups "anxiety state" and "depressive disorder" and separation of the 152 patients also was achieved with the aid of ratings on the Maudsley Personality Inventory and the Cattell 16 PF Battery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信