1982 - 2020年干旱和气候因子对中亚植被动态的影响

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Liang Liu , Jian Peng , Gangyong Li , Jingyun Guan , Wanqiang Han , Xifeng Ju , Jianghua Zheng
{"title":"1982 - 2020年干旱和气候因子对中亚植被动态的影响","authors":"Liang Liu ,&nbsp;Jian Peng ,&nbsp;Gangyong Li ,&nbsp;Jingyun Guan ,&nbsp;Wanqiang Han ,&nbsp;Xifeng Ju ,&nbsp;Jianghua Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Ecological security and ecosystem stability in Central Asia<span> depend heavily on the local vegetation. Vegetation dynamics and the response and </span></span>hysteresis<span> relationships to climate factors and drought on multiple scales over long time series in the region still need to be further explored. Using the net primary productivity (NPP) values as the vegetation change index of interest, in this study, we analyzed vegetation dynamics in Central Asia from 1982 to 2020 and assessed the responses and time lags of vegetation to climate factors and drought. The results showed that NPP gradually decreased from north to south and from east to west. Vegetation was distributed along both sides of the mountains. The temperatures rose from northeast to southwest, while precipitation gradually increased from southwest to northeast. The proportion of dry and wet years was as follows: normal (56.41%) &gt; slightly dry (28.2%) &gt; slightly humid (15.39%). Precipitation and drought conditions were positively correlated with NPP during the growing season, while temperature was negatively correlated with NPP. Increased spring temperature, precipitation, and drought conditions positively affected vegetation, while sustained summer temperature resulted in suppressed vegetation growth. Autumn vegetation was positively affected by temperature and drought, and precipitation was negatively correlated with autumn vegetation. Increasing winter temperatures promoted vegetation growth. The time lag between NPP and temperature gradually increased from northeast to southwest, and the time lag between NPP and precipitation gradually increased from south to north. Spring temperatures had the greatest beneficial impact on forestlands; summer </span></span>climatic factors<span> and drought had little effect on shrublands; the autumn climate exhibited small differences in its influence of each plant type; and winter temperatures had the greatest positive effect on grasslands. No time lag effect was found between any of the four vegetation types and precipitation. A one-month lag was found between cultivated lands and temperature; a two-month lag was found between forestlands and temperature; and a one-month lag was found between forestlands and drought and between shrublands and drought. The results can provide a scientific foundation for the sustainable development and management of ecosystems.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 116997"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of drought and climate factors on vegetation dynamics in Central Asia from 1982 to 2020\",\"authors\":\"Liang Liu ,&nbsp;Jian Peng ,&nbsp;Gangyong Li ,&nbsp;Jingyun Guan ,&nbsp;Wanqiang Han ,&nbsp;Xifeng Ju ,&nbsp;Jianghua Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Ecological security and ecosystem stability in Central Asia<span> depend heavily on the local vegetation. Vegetation dynamics and the response and </span></span>hysteresis<span> relationships to climate factors and drought on multiple scales over long time series in the region still need to be further explored. Using the net primary productivity (NPP) values as the vegetation change index of interest, in this study, we analyzed vegetation dynamics in Central Asia from 1982 to 2020 and assessed the responses and time lags of vegetation to climate factors and drought. The results showed that NPP gradually decreased from north to south and from east to west. Vegetation was distributed along both sides of the mountains. The temperatures rose from northeast to southwest, while precipitation gradually increased from southwest to northeast. The proportion of dry and wet years was as follows: normal (56.41%) &gt; slightly dry (28.2%) &gt; slightly humid (15.39%). Precipitation and drought conditions were positively correlated with NPP during the growing season, while temperature was negatively correlated with NPP. Increased spring temperature, precipitation, and drought conditions positively affected vegetation, while sustained summer temperature resulted in suppressed vegetation growth. Autumn vegetation was positively affected by temperature and drought, and precipitation was negatively correlated with autumn vegetation. Increasing winter temperatures promoted vegetation growth. The time lag between NPP and temperature gradually increased from northeast to southwest, and the time lag between NPP and precipitation gradually increased from south to north. Spring temperatures had the greatest beneficial impact on forestlands; summer </span></span>climatic factors<span> and drought had little effect on shrublands; the autumn climate exhibited small differences in its influence of each plant type; and winter temperatures had the greatest positive effect on grasslands. No time lag effect was found between any of the four vegetation types and precipitation. A one-month lag was found between cultivated lands and temperature; a two-month lag was found between forestlands and temperature; and a one-month lag was found between forestlands and drought and between shrublands and drought. The results can provide a scientific foundation for the sustainable development and management of ecosystems.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"328 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722025701\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722025701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

中亚地区的生态安全和生态系统稳定在很大程度上依赖于当地的植被。该地区植被动态及其对气候因子和干旱多尺度、长时间序列的响应和滞后关系仍需进一步探索。本文以净初级生产力(NPP)值为研究对象,分析了1982 - 2020年中亚地区植被动态变化,评价了植被对气候因子和干旱的响应及其滞后性。结果表明:NPP自北向南、自东向西逐渐减小;植被分布在山的两侧。气温由东北向西南上升,降水由西南向东北逐渐增加。干湿年份占比为:正常(56.41%);稍干(28.2%)>略潮湿(15.39%)。生长季降水和干旱条件与NPP呈正相关,而温度与NPP呈负相关。春季温度、降水和干旱条件的增加对植被有积极影响,而夏季温度的持续升高则抑制了植被的生长。秋季植被受温度和干旱的正向影响,降水与秋季植被负相关。冬季气温的升高促进了植被的生长。NPP与气温的时间差从东北向西南逐渐增大,NPP与降水的时间差从南向北逐渐增大。春季气温对林地的有利影响最大;夏季气候因子和干旱对灌丛地影响不大;不同植物类型对秋季气候的影响差异不大;冬季气温对草原的积极影响最大。4种植被类型与降水均不存在时滞效应。耕地与温度之间存在一个月的滞后;森林面积和温度之间存在两个月的滞后;林地和干旱之间以及灌木地和干旱之间存在一个月的滞后。研究结果可为生态系统的可持续发展和管理提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of drought and climate factors on vegetation dynamics in Central Asia from 1982 to 2020

Ecological security and ecosystem stability in Central Asia depend heavily on the local vegetation. Vegetation dynamics and the response and hysteresis relationships to climate factors and drought on multiple scales over long time series in the region still need to be further explored. Using the net primary productivity (NPP) values as the vegetation change index of interest, in this study, we analyzed vegetation dynamics in Central Asia from 1982 to 2020 and assessed the responses and time lags of vegetation to climate factors and drought. The results showed that NPP gradually decreased from north to south and from east to west. Vegetation was distributed along both sides of the mountains. The temperatures rose from northeast to southwest, while precipitation gradually increased from southwest to northeast. The proportion of dry and wet years was as follows: normal (56.41%) > slightly dry (28.2%) > slightly humid (15.39%). Precipitation and drought conditions were positively correlated with NPP during the growing season, while temperature was negatively correlated with NPP. Increased spring temperature, precipitation, and drought conditions positively affected vegetation, while sustained summer temperature resulted in suppressed vegetation growth. Autumn vegetation was positively affected by temperature and drought, and precipitation was negatively correlated with autumn vegetation. Increasing winter temperatures promoted vegetation growth. The time lag between NPP and temperature gradually increased from northeast to southwest, and the time lag between NPP and precipitation gradually increased from south to north. Spring temperatures had the greatest beneficial impact on forestlands; summer climatic factors and drought had little effect on shrublands; the autumn climate exhibited small differences in its influence of each plant type; and winter temperatures had the greatest positive effect on grasslands. No time lag effect was found between any of the four vegetation types and precipitation. A one-month lag was found between cultivated lands and temperature; a two-month lag was found between forestlands and temperature; and a one-month lag was found between forestlands and drought and between shrublands and drought. The results can provide a scientific foundation for the sustainable development and management of ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信