印度的医疗多元化和保健服务

Aneeta A. Minocha
{"title":"印度的医疗多元化和保健服务","authors":"Aneeta A. Minocha","doi":"10.1016/0160-7987(80)90047-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The problem of the equitable distribution of health services has gained universal recognition. In the developing countries, studies have indicated an uneven distribution of medical and health services, and various people have offered alternate approaches, strategies, and programmes to rectify this imbalance. Based on these reports, programmes have been launched in India, but unwarranted assumptions and biases underlie generalizations in this literature about the Indian medical situation. For example, the system of modern medicine has been characterized as elitist, urban-oriented, curative, hospital-based and so forth; and therefore, by implication, unsuited to Indian conditions. The result is a simplistic picture which has obfuscated clear thinking.</p><p>The problem has multiple dimensions, making it imperative for the sociologist to disentangle the issues. One has to clarify the meaning of medical pluralism in India, and separate its various components. There is need to separate the political from the economic dimensions of health and medical problems, and to isolate the purely medical from the non-medical interventions in health care. One has also to analyze the community's response to medical pluralism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79261,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 217-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(80)90047-2","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical pluralism and health services in India\",\"authors\":\"Aneeta A. Minocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0160-7987(80)90047-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The problem of the equitable distribution of health services has gained universal recognition. In the developing countries, studies have indicated an uneven distribution of medical and health services, and various people have offered alternate approaches, strategies, and programmes to rectify this imbalance. Based on these reports, programmes have been launched in India, but unwarranted assumptions and biases underlie generalizations in this literature about the Indian medical situation. For example, the system of modern medicine has been characterized as elitist, urban-oriented, curative, hospital-based and so forth; and therefore, by implication, unsuited to Indian conditions. The result is a simplistic picture which has obfuscated clear thinking.</p><p>The problem has multiple dimensions, making it imperative for the sociologist to disentangle the issues. One has to clarify the meaning of medical pluralism in India, and separate its various components. There is need to separate the political from the economic dimensions of health and medical problems, and to isolate the purely medical from the non-medical interventions in health care. One has also to analyze the community's response to medical pluralism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 217-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(80)90047-2\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798780900472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798780900472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

公平分配保健服务的问题已得到普遍承认。在发展中国家,研究表明医疗和保健服务的分布不平衡,不同的人提出了纠正这种不平衡的替代办法、战略和方案。在这些报告的基础上,印度启动了一些方案,但这些文献中对印度医疗状况的概括是毫无根据的假设和偏见。例如,现代医学体系具有精英化、城市化、治疗化、医院化等特点;因此,言下之意,不适合印度的情况。结果是一幅过于简单化的画面,混淆了清晰的思维。这个问题有多个方面,因此社会学家必须把这些问题弄清楚。人们必须澄清印度医疗多元化的含义,并将其各个组成部分分开。有必要将保健和医疗问题的政治层面与经济层面分开,并将保健中的纯医疗干预与非医疗干预分开。人们还必须分析社会对医疗多元化的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical pluralism and health services in India

The problem of the equitable distribution of health services has gained universal recognition. In the developing countries, studies have indicated an uneven distribution of medical and health services, and various people have offered alternate approaches, strategies, and programmes to rectify this imbalance. Based on these reports, programmes have been launched in India, but unwarranted assumptions and biases underlie generalizations in this literature about the Indian medical situation. For example, the system of modern medicine has been characterized as elitist, urban-oriented, curative, hospital-based and so forth; and therefore, by implication, unsuited to Indian conditions. The result is a simplistic picture which has obfuscated clear thinking.

The problem has multiple dimensions, making it imperative for the sociologist to disentangle the issues. One has to clarify the meaning of medical pluralism in India, and separate its various components. There is need to separate the political from the economic dimensions of health and medical problems, and to isolate the purely medical from the non-medical interventions in health care. One has also to analyze the community's response to medical pluralism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信