前列腺素E1、前列环素和托唑啉对新生猪肺血管阻力升高影响的比较研究

M.B. Starling , J.M. Neutze , R.L. Elliott , R.B. Elliott
{"title":"前列腺素E1、前列环素和托唑啉对新生猪肺血管阻力升高影响的比较研究","authors":"M.B. Starling ,&nbsp;J.M. Neutze ,&nbsp;R.L. Elliott ,&nbsp;R.B. Elliott","doi":"10.1016/0161-4630(81)90024-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forty-eight hour old anesthetised and ventilated neonatal piglets were cannulated in order to measure pressures, blood gases and cardiac outputs (CO) from which pulmonary (PVR) and systemic (SVR) vascular resistances were calculated. After baseline measurements had been made inspired gases were altered to produce hypoxemia and hypercapnia, to raise PVR. Animals then received Prostaglandin E<sub>1</sub> (PGE<sub>1</sub>), Tolazoline (TOL), and Prostacyclin (PGI<sub>2</sub>) in varying dosages until PVR was reduced or the dosage no longer tolerated.</p><p>With “hypoxia” CO, PVR and pulmonary artery (PA) pressures rose; aortic pressure also rose although SVR tended to fall. PGE<sub>1</sub> (5μg/kg/min) and PGI<sub>2</sub> (1.0 μg/kg/min) both produced a significant fall in PVR. The decrease in PVR with TOL (1 mg/kg/10 minutes and 2 mg/kg/l hour) was less consistent and in surviving animals did not achieve statistical significance by multivariate analysis. SVR fell with all drugs although the change with TOL was again non-significant. With both PGI<sub>2</sub> and TOL there was a trend for CO to rise and, although this did not reach significant levels, it restricted the drop in arterial pressure to approximately control levels. The fall in arterial pressure with PGE<sub>1</sub> was greater. The death rate with treatment with TOL was much higher than that seen with the other two drugs.</p><p>Circulatory changes in a group of animals with normal blood gases treated with PGI<sub>2</sub> (1 μg/kg/min) were similar to those seen with the hypoxic group.</p><p>In this preparation PGI<sub>2</sub> appeared the most satisfactory drug for the treatment of elevated PVR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76381,"journal":{"name":"Prostaglandins and medicine","volume":"7 5","pages":"Pages 349-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0161-4630(81)90024-0","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative studies on the hemodynamic effects of prostaglandin E1 prostacyclin, and tolazoline upon elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in neonatal swine\",\"authors\":\"M.B. Starling ,&nbsp;J.M. Neutze ,&nbsp;R.L. Elliott ,&nbsp;R.B. Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0161-4630(81)90024-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Forty-eight hour old anesthetised and ventilated neonatal piglets were cannulated in order to measure pressures, blood gases and cardiac outputs (CO) from which pulmonary (PVR) and systemic (SVR) vascular resistances were calculated. After baseline measurements had been made inspired gases were altered to produce hypoxemia and hypercapnia, to raise PVR. Animals then received Prostaglandin E<sub>1</sub> (PGE<sub>1</sub>), Tolazoline (TOL), and Prostacyclin (PGI<sub>2</sub>) in varying dosages until PVR was reduced or the dosage no longer tolerated.</p><p>With “hypoxia” CO, PVR and pulmonary artery (PA) pressures rose; aortic pressure also rose although SVR tended to fall. PGE<sub>1</sub> (5μg/kg/min) and PGI<sub>2</sub> (1.0 μg/kg/min) both produced a significant fall in PVR. The decrease in PVR with TOL (1 mg/kg/10 minutes and 2 mg/kg/l hour) was less consistent and in surviving animals did not achieve statistical significance by multivariate analysis. SVR fell with all drugs although the change with TOL was again non-significant. With both PGI<sub>2</sub> and TOL there was a trend for CO to rise and, although this did not reach significant levels, it restricted the drop in arterial pressure to approximately control levels. The fall in arterial pressure with PGE<sub>1</sub> was greater. The death rate with treatment with TOL was much higher than that seen with the other two drugs.</p><p>Circulatory changes in a group of animals with normal blood gases treated with PGI<sub>2</sub> (1 μg/kg/min) were similar to those seen with the hypoxic group.</p><p>In this preparation PGI<sub>2</sub> appeared the most satisfactory drug for the treatment of elevated PVR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostaglandins and medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 349-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0161-4630(81)90024-0\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostaglandins and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0161463081900240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostaglandins and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0161463081900240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

对48小时大的麻醉和通气新生仔猪插管,测量其血压、血气和心输出量(CO),并以此计算肺(PVR)和全身(SVR)血管阻力。在基线测量完成后,吸入气体被改变以产生低氧血症和高碳酸血症,以提高PVR。然后,动物接受不同剂量的前列腺素E1 (PGE1)、托唑啉(TOL)和前列环素(PGI2),直到PVR降低或剂量不再耐受。CO“缺氧”时,PVR和肺动脉压升高;主动脉压也升高,但SVR有下降的趋势。PGE1 (5μg/kg/min)和PGI2 (1.0 μg/kg/min)均显著降低PVR。TOL (1 mg/kg/10分钟和2 mg/kg/l小时)对PVR的降低不太一致,在存活动物中,多因素分析没有达到统计学意义。所有药物的SVR均下降,但TOL的变化同样无显著性。PGI2和TOL都有CO升高的趋势,虽然没有达到显著水平,但它限制了动脉压的下降到大约控制水平。PGE1组动脉压下降幅度更大。TOL治疗的死亡率远高于其他两种药物。用PGI2 (1 μg/kg/min)处理血气正常的动物,其循环变化与缺氧组相似。在该制剂中,PGI2是治疗PVR升高最满意的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative studies on the hemodynamic effects of prostaglandin E1 prostacyclin, and tolazoline upon elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in neonatal swine

Forty-eight hour old anesthetised and ventilated neonatal piglets were cannulated in order to measure pressures, blood gases and cardiac outputs (CO) from which pulmonary (PVR) and systemic (SVR) vascular resistances were calculated. After baseline measurements had been made inspired gases were altered to produce hypoxemia and hypercapnia, to raise PVR. Animals then received Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), Tolazoline (TOL), and Prostacyclin (PGI2) in varying dosages until PVR was reduced or the dosage no longer tolerated.

With “hypoxia” CO, PVR and pulmonary artery (PA) pressures rose; aortic pressure also rose although SVR tended to fall. PGE1 (5μg/kg/min) and PGI2 (1.0 μg/kg/min) both produced a significant fall in PVR. The decrease in PVR with TOL (1 mg/kg/10 minutes and 2 mg/kg/l hour) was less consistent and in surviving animals did not achieve statistical significance by multivariate analysis. SVR fell with all drugs although the change with TOL was again non-significant. With both PGI2 and TOL there was a trend for CO to rise and, although this did not reach significant levels, it restricted the drop in arterial pressure to approximately control levels. The fall in arterial pressure with PGE1 was greater. The death rate with treatment with TOL was much higher than that seen with the other two drugs.

Circulatory changes in a group of animals with normal blood gases treated with PGI2 (1 μg/kg/min) were similar to those seen with the hypoxic group.

In this preparation PGI2 appeared the most satisfactory drug for the treatment of elevated PVR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信