敬虔的医学:1900-1945年坦桑尼亚东南部医疗使命的模糊性

Terence O. Ranger
{"title":"敬虔的医学:1900-1945年坦桑尼亚东南部医疗使命的模糊性","authors":"Terence O. Ranger","doi":"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90052-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent historical writing has cast medical missions in Africa as handmaidens of colonialism. The present paper offers a revisionist medical history of one medical mission effort—that of the Universities Mission to Central Africa (U.M.C.A.)—which was explicitly opposed to colonial capitalism and such policies of industrial medicine as the coercion of laborers, but which shared with other missions a paternalistic civilizing mission and Christian evangelization. This combination of scientific rationality and Christian evangelicalism provide the basis for a ‘theory’ of mission medicine, in terms of which it can be asked whether, and to what extent, missions—here the U.M.C.A.—succeeded in their goals. A series of tests confront the Masasi U.M.C.A. medical position, to illustrate mission medical history, including: (1) the early colonial epidemics (1880–1926) which largely overwhelm mission medicine, with the exception of success in treating Yaws; (2) the role of the <em>jamaa</em> lay kin therapy managing group's interference with the mission's self-defined role in diagnosis and treatment; (3) the practice of alternative therapies within the African Christian community; (4) medical modernization and the formation of a cadre of African medical people; (5) initiation rites and efforts of mission personnel to improve circumcision hygienic conditions without disrupting the rites; (6) the challenge of spiritual healing and the rise of African prophetic healing. Although the U.M.C.A. is considered to have failed to maintain its objectives in each of these tests, and ultimately to have abandoned its early ‘theories’, it survives in Tanzania as a government-sanctioned presence with a role in contemporary rural health care, utilizing very different goals from those originally espoused.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79261,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 261-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90052-1","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Godly medicine: The ambiguities of medical mission in Southeast Tanzania, 1900–1945\",\"authors\":\"Terence O. Ranger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90052-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recent historical writing has cast medical missions in Africa as handmaidens of colonialism. The present paper offers a revisionist medical history of one medical mission effort—that of the Universities Mission to Central Africa (U.M.C.A.)—which was explicitly opposed to colonial capitalism and such policies of industrial medicine as the coercion of laborers, but which shared with other missions a paternalistic civilizing mission and Christian evangelization. This combination of scientific rationality and Christian evangelicalism provide the basis for a ‘theory’ of mission medicine, in terms of which it can be asked whether, and to what extent, missions—here the U.M.C.A.—succeeded in their goals. A series of tests confront the Masasi U.M.C.A. medical position, to illustrate mission medical history, including: (1) the early colonial epidemics (1880–1926) which largely overwhelm mission medicine, with the exception of success in treating Yaws; (2) the role of the <em>jamaa</em> lay kin therapy managing group's interference with the mission's self-defined role in diagnosis and treatment; (3) the practice of alternative therapies within the African Christian community; (4) medical modernization and the formation of a cadre of African medical people; (5) initiation rites and efforts of mission personnel to improve circumcision hygienic conditions without disrupting the rites; (6) the challenge of spiritual healing and the rise of African prophetic healing. Although the U.M.C.A. is considered to have failed to maintain its objectives in each of these tests, and ultimately to have abandoned its early ‘theories’, it survives in Tanzania as a government-sanctioned presence with a role in contemporary rural health care, utilizing very different goals from those originally espoused.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 261-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90052-1\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

最近的历史著作把在非洲的医疗使团描绘成殖民主义的使女。本论文提供了一个医学宣教努力的修正主义医疗史——中非大学宣教团(u.m.c.a)——它明确反对殖民资本主义和工业医疗政策,如强迫劳工,但它与其他宣教团分享了家长式的文明使命和基督教福音传播。这种科学理性和基督教福音主义的结合为宣教医学的“理论”提供了基础,从这个角度来看,我们可以问宣教——这里是联合基督教会——是否成功了,以及在多大程度上成功了。Masasi umca的医学立场面临一系列测试,以说明教会的医疗历史,包括:(1)早期殖民地流行病(1880-1926),除了治疗雅司病的成功外,这些流行病在很大程度上压倒了教会的医学;(2) jama lay kin治疗管理小组对特派团自我定义的诊断和治疗角色的干扰作用;(3)非洲基督教社区内的替代疗法的实践;(4)医疗现代化,非洲医疗人才队伍的形成;(5)启动仪式和传教人员在不破坏仪式的情况下改善割礼卫生条件的努力;(6)属灵医治的挑战和非洲先知医治的兴起。尽管umca被认为未能在每一次测试中保持其目标,并最终放弃了其早期的“理论”,但它作为政府批准的存在存在于坦桑尼亚,在当代农村医疗保健中发挥作用,其目标与最初所支持的目标截然不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Godly medicine: The ambiguities of medical mission in Southeast Tanzania, 1900–1945

Recent historical writing has cast medical missions in Africa as handmaidens of colonialism. The present paper offers a revisionist medical history of one medical mission effort—that of the Universities Mission to Central Africa (U.M.C.A.)—which was explicitly opposed to colonial capitalism and such policies of industrial medicine as the coercion of laborers, but which shared with other missions a paternalistic civilizing mission and Christian evangelization. This combination of scientific rationality and Christian evangelicalism provide the basis for a ‘theory’ of mission medicine, in terms of which it can be asked whether, and to what extent, missions—here the U.M.C.A.—succeeded in their goals. A series of tests confront the Masasi U.M.C.A. medical position, to illustrate mission medical history, including: (1) the early colonial epidemics (1880–1926) which largely overwhelm mission medicine, with the exception of success in treating Yaws; (2) the role of the jamaa lay kin therapy managing group's interference with the mission's self-defined role in diagnosis and treatment; (3) the practice of alternative therapies within the African Christian community; (4) medical modernization and the formation of a cadre of African medical people; (5) initiation rites and efforts of mission personnel to improve circumcision hygienic conditions without disrupting the rites; (6) the challenge of spiritual healing and the rise of African prophetic healing. Although the U.M.C.A. is considered to have failed to maintain its objectives in each of these tests, and ultimately to have abandoned its early ‘theories’, it survives in Tanzania as a government-sanctioned presence with a role in contemporary rural health care, utilizing very different goals from those originally espoused.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信