健康状态偏好:测量方法综述。

G W Torrance
{"title":"健康状态偏好:测量方法综述。","authors":"G W Torrance","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The preferences of patients and the public for program outcomes are an important component of program evaluation. This paper reviews methods of measuring such preferences. Topics discussed include the description of the relevant health states, the selection of appropriate subjects, the types of preference scales available and the various preference measurement methods which can be used. The three most common preference measurement techniques--rating scales, standard gamble and time trade-off--are described in detail. The application to both temporary and chronic states is presented, including the case of chronic states considered worse than death. Findings regarding the accuracy of the techniques are summarized.</p>","PeriodicalId":76126,"journal":{"name":"Mead Johnson Symposium on Perinatal and Developmental Medicine","volume":" 20","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for health states: a review of measurement methods.\",\"authors\":\"G W Torrance\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The preferences of patients and the public for program outcomes are an important component of program evaluation. This paper reviews methods of measuring such preferences. Topics discussed include the description of the relevant health states, the selection of appropriate subjects, the types of preference scales available and the various preference measurement methods which can be used. The three most common preference measurement techniques--rating scales, standard gamble and time trade-off--are described in detail. The application to both temporary and chronic states is presented, including the case of chronic states considered worse than death. Findings regarding the accuracy of the techniques are summarized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mead Johnson Symposium on Perinatal and Developmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" 20\",\"pages\":\"37-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mead Johnson Symposium on Perinatal and Developmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mead Johnson Symposium on Perinatal and Developmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者和公众对项目结果的偏好是项目评估的重要组成部分。本文回顾了测量这种偏好的方法。讨论的主题包括相关健康状态的描述、适当受试者的选择、可用偏好量表的类型以及可使用的各种偏好测量方法。详细描述了三种最常见的偏好测量技术——评级量表、标准赌博和时间权衡。该方法适用于暂时状态和慢性状态,包括被认为比死亡更糟糕的慢性状态。总结了有关该技术准确性的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferences for health states: a review of measurement methods.

The preferences of patients and the public for program outcomes are an important component of program evaluation. This paper reviews methods of measuring such preferences. Topics discussed include the description of the relevant health states, the selection of appropriate subjects, the types of preference scales available and the various preference measurement methods which can be used. The three most common preference measurement techniques--rating scales, standard gamble and time trade-off--are described in detail. The application to both temporary and chronic states is presented, including the case of chronic states considered worse than death. Findings regarding the accuracy of the techniques are summarized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信