二分词测验的心理测量特性。

C M Clark, O Spreen
{"title":"二分词测验的心理测量特性。","authors":"C M Clark,&nbsp;O Spreen","doi":"10.1080/01688638308401163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study examined the reliability of a measure of ear advantage and the total scores derived from the dichotic listening task. The scores for both measures were found: (1) not to differ from the normal distribution, and (2) to be reliable over items, tests, and time. However, the total scores were dependent upon stimulus materials and experience. In addition, a psychometric classification model was proposed and it was found that the majority, at least 51.6% of the subjects, did not exhibit a truly measureable ear advantage. Finally, it was argued that total scores as well as ear advantage should be considered in the analysis of dichotic listening studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":79225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","volume":"5 2","pages":"169-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638308401163","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of dichotic words tests.\",\"authors\":\"C M Clark,&nbsp;O Spreen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01688638308401163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study examined the reliability of a measure of ear advantage and the total scores derived from the dichotic listening task. The scores for both measures were found: (1) not to differ from the normal distribution, and (2) to be reliable over items, tests, and time. However, the total scores were dependent upon stimulus materials and experience. In addition, a psychometric classification model was proposed and it was found that the majority, at least 51.6% of the subjects, did not exhibit a truly measureable ear advantage. Finally, it was argued that total scores as well as ear advantage should be considered in the analysis of dichotic listening studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"169-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638308401163\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638308401163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638308401163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目前的研究检验了耳朵优势测量的可靠性,以及从二元听力任务中得出的总分。两种测量的分数被发现:(1)与正态分布没有差异,(2)在项目、测试和时间上是可靠的。然而,总得分取决于刺激材料和经验。此外,提出了一个心理测量分类模型,发现大多数,至少51.6%的受试者,没有表现出真正可测量的耳朵优势。最后,本文认为在分析二元听力研究时,应考虑总分和耳朵优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties of dichotic words tests.

The current study examined the reliability of a measure of ear advantage and the total scores derived from the dichotic listening task. The scores for both measures were found: (1) not to differ from the normal distribution, and (2) to be reliable over items, tests, and time. However, the total scores were dependent upon stimulus materials and experience. In addition, a psychometric classification model was proposed and it was found that the majority, at least 51.6% of the subjects, did not exhibit a truly measureable ear advantage. Finally, it was argued that total scores as well as ear advantage should be considered in the analysis of dichotic listening studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信