{"title":"神经心理学个案研究中的假定问题和纯粹进展。","authors":"J C Marshall, F Newcombe","doi":"10.1080/01688638408401197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We consider the logic of basing theories of normal and pathological cognitive functioning upon the selective deficits revealed by single-case studies. Objections to this strategy, concerned with the rarity of pertinent cases, the role of methodological artifacts, and the existence of normal variation in brain functions are refuted. We conclude that, in neuropsychology, a group has no significance over and above the individual members it contains.</p>","PeriodicalId":79225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","volume":"6 1","pages":"65-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638408401197","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putative problems and pure progress in neuropsychological single-case studies.\",\"authors\":\"J C Marshall, F Newcombe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01688638408401197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We consider the logic of basing theories of normal and pathological cognitive functioning upon the selective deficits revealed by single-case studies. Objections to this strategy, concerned with the rarity of pertinent cases, the role of methodological artifacts, and the existence of normal variation in brain functions are refuted. We conclude that, in neuropsychology, a group has no significance over and above the individual members it contains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"65-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638408401197\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638408401197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638408401197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Putative problems and pure progress in neuropsychological single-case studies.
We consider the logic of basing theories of normal and pathological cognitive functioning upon the selective deficits revealed by single-case studies. Objections to this strategy, concerned with the rarity of pertinent cases, the role of methodological artifacts, and the existence of normal variation in brain functions are refuted. We conclude that, in neuropsychology, a group has no significance over and above the individual members it contains.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
